Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Mar 18. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002809. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A large factor influencing a patient’s choice of aesthetic plastic surgeons is online patient reviews.
METHODS/TECHNIQUE: Plastic surgeons whose practices are located in counties within the New York metro area were included. Selected surgeons were divided into private and academic surgeons (defined as having a residency program). For each surgeon, the quantity and quality of their Google reviews were collected.
RESULTS/COMPLICATIONS: A total of 145 aesthetic surgeons from the New York area were included in the study, both private (n = 126) and academic (n = 19). Given the small size of the latter cohort, 19 private aesthetic surgeons were randomly selected, and compared with the academic surgeons, it was shown that private surgeons had both higher average quality and quantity of online patient Google reviews (confidence interval, 95%; P = 0.0223). Similar results were found when comparing all private American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) surgeons (n = 126) with all academic ASAPS surgeons (n = 19); private ASAPS surgeons had a higher average rating and number of reviews when compared with academic surgeons, again representing a statistically significant difference for the quality of online reviews between private and academic surgeons (confidence interval, 95%; P = 0.031975).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in both the quality and quantity of online ratings for private and academic aesthetic surgeons.
PMID:33833182 | DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002809
