IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 Jul 4;PP. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3292062. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
A recent paper claims that a newly proposed method classifies EEG data recorded from subjects viewing ImageNet stimuli better than two prior methods. However, the analysis used to support that claim is based on confounded data. We repeat the analysis on a large new dataset that is free from that confound. Training and testing on aggregated supertrials derived by summing trials demonstrates that the two prior methods achieve statistically significant above-chance accuracy while the newly proposed method does not.
PMID:37402186 | DOI:10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3292062
