S D Med. 2023 May;76(5):198-207.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Data on long-term outcomes and subjective patient symptom improvement following primary native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair is limited. Our primary aim was to evaluate the long-term prolapse recurrence and retreatment rates of women who have undergone native tissue prolapse repair. Our secondary aim was to evaluate subjective patient improvement in pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life 7 to 10 years after surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone primary prolapse repair surgery including a hysterectomy and native tissue repair by a single surgeon at a tertiary pelvic floor center from 2009 to 2013. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory was distributed to subjects before and 7 to 10 years after surgery and preand post-operative survey results were compared. Subjects were asked if they had symptom recurrence and if they required retreatment.
RESULTS: One hundred twelve of the 204 distributed surveys were returned, yielding a 54.9% response rate. 8.6% of subjects reported prolapse symptom recurrence. 1.9% of subjects were retreated with a pessary. No subjects required additional prolapse repair surgery. 77.1% of subjects had improved PFDI-20 scores following surgery with an average improvement of 46.21 points. Statistically significant score improvements were also observed on PFDI-20 subsections.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary pelvic organ prolapse repair utilizing native tissue results in low recurrence and retreatment rates. Patients can expect long-term clinical improvement in pelvic floor disorders and quality of life following prolapse surgery. Definitions of surgical success should be based on subjective patient symptoms and quality of life measures.
PMID:37603869
