BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 2;13(11):e071253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071253.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The optimal puncture technique for neuraxial anaesthesia in different populations is unclear. We sought to obtain data from randomised controlled trials comparing the impact of ultrasound-guided technology and traditional positioning technology on the success rate of neuraxial anaesthesia.
DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis using study populations, interventions, intervention comparisons, outcome measures and study types.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science were searched until 31 September 2022.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing three types of neuraxial anaesthesia: ultrasound-assisted, ultrasound real-time guidance and conventional positioning to describe which neuraxial anaesthesia modality is best for patients and to recommend the appropriate one for different populations.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Five independent reviewers retrieved, screened and edited included studies using standardised methods. Assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA V.15 statistical software.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies containing three different interventions were included. The SUCRA values of first-pass success rates for the three neuraxial anaesthesia methods were real-time guidance (82.8%), ultrasound-assisted (67.1%) and traditional positioning (0.1%). Both ultrasound techniques improved first-pass success rates compared with traditional localization, but there was no significant difference between the two. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of real-time ultrasound guidance for neuraxial anaesthesia in pregnant and patients with obesity improved first-pass success rates. Ultrasound-assisted technology can improve first-attempt success rates in older patients with abnormal lumbar spine anatomy.
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional positioning, ultrasound guidance technology can improve the first-pass success rate of neuraxial anaesthesia, but there is no significant difference between ultrasound-assisted and real-time guidance technology. The results of subgroup analysis tell us that the most suitable neuraxial anaesthesia method is different for different groups of people.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO number: CRD42022376041.
PMID:37918920 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071253
