Otol Neurotol. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):e24-e27. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004052. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Reevaluating and expanding cochlear implantation’s (CI) indication while measuring the quality of life (QoL) outcomes regarding the parent’s point of view of prelingually deafened, late-implanted patients, which are widely known to showcases a limited improvement in speech recognition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive and analytic study to assess QoL outcomes from CI in 64 early deafened, late-implanted patients, according to their parent’s perspective, between January 2009 and December 2019, using the Nottingham Pediatric Cochlear Implant Program (Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom) “Children with cochlear implantation: parents perspective.”
RESULTS: The most represented age interval is the 5 and 7 interval and the mean age is 10.09 years. There was no sex predominance, with rural origin and high school academicals level preponderance. Fourteen children had experienced neonatal icterus, eight had meningitis, and seven were the result of related marriage. The age of the first consultation was typically over 2 years old, with only 45 schooled children. Age had a significantly statistic correlation between Self-reliance and Well-being and happiness subscales. History of receiving aid and speech therapy has a clear correlation with Self-reliance, Well-being and happiness, and Communication and Education. Schooling statuses, sex, age of appearance, and communication mode were not correlated to any subscale score, and with the exception of Effect of implantation, all the other “Children with cochlear implantation: parent’s perspective” subscales were intercorrelated.
CONCLUSION: Properly validated QoL assessments for CI are a must, as outcomes of CI expand beyond audiometric performances to include the improvement of QoL.
PMID:38085762 | DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004052
