Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

A comparative study of the CT effective dose in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for arm-raised position and arm-lowered position

Radiography (Lond). 2024 Jan 4;30(1):416-421. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.012. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate and compare the effective dose (ED) delivered by computed tomography (CT) in whole-body positron emission tomography/CT (WB-PET/CT) scans between patients positioned with their arms-raised and those with their arms-lowered during the scan on a large population.

METHODS: The retrospective study involved 785 oncology patients who underwent WB-PET/CT scans with 18F-FDG between January and June 2019. Exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a final analysis of data from 732 adult patients. All of the patients were measured height and weight, and the ED from CT in WB-PET/CT was estimated using the dose length product value and a conversion factor. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore relationships between factors and the ED. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate connections between weight and ED, and height and ED. Multiple linear regression was used to predict ED based on sex, weight, and arm position.

RESULTS: The arm-lowered group had a higher ED than the arm-raised group, and the median dose was 1.1 times higher in the arm-lowered group. The difference in ED between the two groups was found to be greater with higher body weight. Arm-position (β = 0.460), sex (β = -0.190), and weight (β = 0.057) were significant predictors of ED.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that arm position, sex, and weight were significant factors influencing the ED from CT scans in WB-PET/CT.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The research underscores the importance of considering these factors when evaluating radiation exposure in clinical practice, particularly for patients undergoing WB-CT imaging. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the radiation dosimetry associated with different patient positions during WB-PET/CT scans.

PMID:38181465 | DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.012

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala