Aust Endod J. 2021 Jun 7. doi: 10.1111/aej.12534. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of UAI with ESI, sonic activation with Eddy® and syringe irrigation in removing debris, and dentin removal during canal irrigation. Twenty-four mandibular molars containing isthmus type V and with a mean curvature of 32.5º were instrumented and divided into three groups for final irrigation: UAI with ESI, sonic activation with Eddy and syringe irrigation. The samples were scanned in a SkyScan 1172 micro-CT device for pre-, post-instrumentation and post-irrigation images and analysis of dentin removal. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. UAI and sonic activation significantly improved debris removal (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed regarding dentin removal between the groups (P > 0.05), although higher values were found for UAI. Sonic activation with Eddy® showed to be an effective and safe device since it was able to remove debris without causing damage to the canal walls.
PMID:34097337 | DOI:10.1111/aej.12534