J Vasc Access. 2024 Oct 24:11297298241291695. doi: 10.1177/11297298241291695. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Optimizing vascular access for hemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease is crucial. While arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred for better patency and fewer complications, many patients require alternatives options like arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) due to anatomical constraints. This study compares outcomes between elbow and upper arm (UA) basilic veins for forearm loop AVGs, highlighting the potential benefits of the UA basilic vein to improve patency and feasibility in patients with poor elbow veins through retrospective analysis.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 59 limbs of patients who underwent forearm loop AVG formation from January 2018 to June 2022. Elbow veins (basilic, median cubital, brachial) and UA basilic veins were evaluated for suitability using duplex ultrasonography. AVG decisions were based on patient age, health, and vein diameter (⩾2.3 mm). Statistical analyses compared baseline characteristics and evaluated primary and secondary patency rates at 12 and 18 months using Pearson’s chi-square, Student’s t-test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the Log-rank test.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had elbow anastomosis, while 23 had UA anastomosis for forearm loop AVG. The elbow group had a higher male proportion (72.7% vs 34.7% in UA, p = 0.005) and larger elbow vein diameters (2.52 ± 0.19 mm vs 2.16 ± 0.21 mm in UA, p < 0.001). Primary patency rates at 12 months were 72.7% for elbow and 56.2% for UA; at 18 months, 59.4% and 25.5%, respectively (p = 0.376). Secondary patency rates at 12 months were 75.7% for elbow and 62.2% for UA; at 18 months, 67.8% and 33.9%, respectively (p = 0.238).
CONCLUSION: The primary and secondary patency rates of forearm loop AVG with UA basilic vein anastomosis were not inferior to those with elbow veins anastomosis. UA basilic vein can be a feasible alternative for creating forearm loop AVG when elbow veins are not suitable.
PMID:39446468 | DOI:10.1177/11297298241291695
