Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 17;30(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02563-x.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While previous studies have indicated comparable outcomes for redo surgical valve replacement (SVR) and primary SVR, there is limited information regarding the long-term follow-up of these patients. Providing prognostic data on redo SVR is crucial for enhancing decision-making and medical care, as well as for identifying low-risk subsets of patients eligible for redo SVR. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent their first and second redo SVR of a previously replaced valve.
METHODS: We included 118 consecutive patients with a history of first or second redo SVR. The participants had a mean age of 57.5 ± 14.4 years, with 71 (60%) being female. The median follow-up period was 69 months. Clinical, intraoperative, and laboratory data were analyzed to assess all-cause mortality, major adverse events (MAE), and a composite of prosthetic valve thrombosis, embolic events, and major hemorrhage (TEH), along with their predictors. Bayesian model averaging was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 11 patients (9.3%). Chronic kidney disease was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. The overall survival rates at one and five years were 86% (95% CI 80% to 93%) and 76% (95% CI 68% to 85%), respectively. Dyslipidemia, a history of major bleeding, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and transvalvular leakage in biological prostheses were all associated with all-cause mortality as independent predictors. The TEH-free survival rates at one and five years were 91% (95% CI 86% to 97%) and 79% (95% CI 71% to 88%), respectively. Diabetes, sex, a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, and baseline functional capacity were identified as independent predictors for the occurrence of TEH. The MAE-free survival rates at one and five years were 82% (95% CI 73% to 92%) and 61% (95% CI 49% to 75%), respectively. Hypertension and baseline functional class were independent predictors of MAE occurrence. The type and anatomical position of the valve were not predictors of mortality, THE, and MAE.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes for redo SVR, especially in patients without significant risk factors. Several potential predictors of adverse outcomes were identified.
PMID:40247382 | DOI:10.1186/s40001-025-02563-x
