Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 13;105:1-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250209-00290. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the combined internal-external approach in establishing surgical portals for hip arthroscopy. Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy at the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army from March 2021 to May 2023. The patients were divided into a trial group (using the combined internal-external approach) and a control group (using the traditional puncture method) based on their voluntary choices of surgical plans. All patients underwent imaging examinations before surgery. During the operation, the time taken to establish the anterolateral approach (AL approach), the time taken to establish the mid-anterior auxiliary approach (MA approach), and the total surgical time were recorded. After surgery, a 1-year follow-up was carried out. Indicators such as the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) score, the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), and the Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SSS) were recorded and compared for the two groups. Results: A total of 77 patients were enrolled with a mean age of (37.9±12.6) years(48 males and 29 females). There were 37 cases in the trial group[ with a mean age of (38.0±11.8) years, 24 males and 13 females] and 40 patients in the control group[ with a mean age of (37.8±13.4) years, 24 males and 16 females]. All indicators in both groups demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively compared with the preoperative values (all P<0.001). No significant intergroup differences existed in the indicators preoperatively (all P>0.05). Postoperatively, there was no significant defferences in VAS of pain [(2.3±2.1) vs (2.4±1.9) points], mHHS [(83.3±7.4) vs (80.2±9.2) points], iHOT-12 [(72.8±15.5) vs (71.1±17.4) points], HOS-ADL [(81.4±16.9) vs (84.0±15.0) points] and HOS-SSS [(55.7±23.4) vs (56.1±19.1) points] or AL approach time [(5.3±0.5) vs (5.4±0.4) minutes] between the trial group and the control group(all P>0.05); however, the MA approach time [(9.0±0.6) vs (14.8±1.3) minutes] and total operative time [(105.2±8.8) vs (119.4±4.7) minutes] in the trial group were both shorter than those in the control group (both P<0.001). The trial group had a lower postoperative complication rate than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant [5.4% (2/37) vs 15.0% (6/40), P=0.263]. Conclusion: Portal establishment using the combined internal-external approach significantly reduces operative time and postoperative complication rate when compared to the traditional puncture technique, representing a safer and more efficient method for hip arthroscopy.
PMID:40511479 | DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250209-00290
