J Med Internet Res. 2025 Nov 3;27:e79718. doi: 10.2196/79718.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Consistent wear is essential for valid and reliable actigraphy data. Adherence to actigraphy may be challenging in primary school children due to developmental and design considerations, yet no quantitative synthesis of adherence in this age group exists.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide the first pooled estimate of actigraphy adherence in primary school-aged children and examine the impact of individual, device, and study-specific factors on adherence.
METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases for studies reporting adherence to actigraphy in primary school-aged children. Searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice via OVID, Education Resources Information Center, British Education Index, and CINAHL via EBSCO using database-specific search strategies conducted between January 2018 and January 24, 2023. Forward and backward citation searches were completed on the Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. Gray literature searches were undertaken in PsycEXTRA and Healthcare Management Information Consortium. Empirical studies reporting quantitative data on adherence to community-based actigraphy in children aged 5-11 years (or if ≥50% of the average age fell within this range) were included. Eligible studies were written in English and could be published or unpublished. Risk of bias was assessed using an 8-item checklist adapted from Berger et al’s actigraphy reporting standards. All included studies were narratively synthesized, and adherence data were pooled in a proportional meta-analysis. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of children meeting wear-time criteria to be included in the analysis compared to the number of children invited to use the device at baseline. Meta-regression was used to examine the impact of individual, device, and study-specific factors on adherence. Prediction intervals were calculated to estimate the range of adherence expected across future studies.
RESULTS: Data were extracted from 235 studies (N=148,161); of these, 135 studies (n=64,541) provided adherence data for proportional meta-analysis. Pooled adherence, measured across 1-140 days, was 81.6% (95% CI 78.7%-84.4%; I2=98.8%). The prediction intervals (42.8%-100%) indicated substantial variability in adherence estimates across studies. Meta-regression suggested that individual characteristics contributed to observed heterogeneity as children with a physical health diagnosis (b=0.236, 95% CI 0.009-0.464; P=.04) and those with neurodevelopmental or mental health diagnosis (b=0.395, 95% CI 0.125-0.665; P=.004) demonstrated higher adherence than undiagnosed children, though these effects were of modest magnitude. No significant effects were found for age, placement, protocol length, protocol deviation, or incentivization. Reporting quality was poor, with only 3.4% of studies satisfying all criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates generally high actigraphy adherence in primary school-aged children, particularly those with health conditions. However, observed variability indicates that adherence was much lower in some contexts, underscoring that the reported pooled adherence cannot be assumed across future actigraphy applications within this age group. Future research should use standardized adherence reporting and should plan for adherence variability.
PMID:41183377 | DOI:10.2196/79718
