JMIR Form Res. 2025 Nov 5;9:e69103. doi: 10.2196/69103.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is vital for improving patient outcomes in medical emergencies. Both laypersons and health care professionals often seek guidance on performing CPR. In today’s digital age, many turn to easily accessible platforms such as YouTube for practical skills.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the didactic and content quality of CPR videos on YouTube using comprehensive checklists and investigates the association between the assigned quality scores and type of publisher, view count, and video rankings.
METHODS: Videos were included based on defined search terms and exclusion criteria. Two emergency physicians rated each video independently using validated checklists concerning content and didactic quality. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationships between video quality scores and view counts, as well as video rankings.
RESULTS: Of the 250 videos identified, 74 (29.6%) met the inclusion criteria. On the content checklist, videos scored an average of 56.5% (SD 19.2%), and on the didactic checklist, they scored 66.6% (SD 14.3%); none achieved the maximum score. Videos from official medical institutions scored significantly higher in content quality compared to nonofficial sources (P=.04). Video quality scores were not associated with video rankings or view counts.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights substantial variability in the didactic and content quality of CPR-related videos on YouTube. For medical educators, this underlines the need to curate and recommend reliable online resources or to develop new high-quality content aligned with established checklists. For the general public, the findings caution against relying on popularity metrics as indicators of accuracy and emphasize the importance of guidance from trusted institutions.
PMID:41191922 | DOI:10.2196/69103
