JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Dec 9;13:e63896. doi: 10.2196/63896.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) remain a leading health challenge worldwide, and reducing modifiable lifestyle risk factors is a key prevention strategy. Digital health interventions (DHIs) offer scalable, cost-effective tools to support healthy behaviors, but concerns persist about their equitable reach and uptake across population groups.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine how socioeconomic factors, health status, lifestyle behaviors, and attitudes and experiences related to the use of electronic services (e-services) are associated with the uptake of a DHI.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we invited (through mail or SMS) a subgroup of 6978 participants aged 20-74 years from the population-based Healthy Finland survey to take part in a DHI. The DHI, delivered via the web-based BitHabit app, aimed to support the adoption of healthy lifestyle habits. Uptake was defined as successful registration, agreeing to the terms of use, and accepting the invitation to participate. Predictor variables were drawn from national registry and self-reported survey data and included socioeconomic status, health indicators, lifestyle behaviors, and attitudes and experiences related to the use of e-services. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to identify significant predictors of DHI uptake.
RESULTS: Of the final sample of 6975 participants, 1287 (18.5%) started using the DHI. Uptake was significantly higher among women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.49-1.93), middle-aged individuals (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.21-1.79), and those with higher income (aORs 1.76-1.97, 95% CIs 1.37-2.59) and more years of education (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.12). Healthier lifestyle indicators, including better diet quality (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10), less frequent smoking or nonsmoking (aORs 1.59-2.29, 95% CIs 1.08-3.12), sleep (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.86), higher functional capacity (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11), and good overall current health (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.15-1.89), were associated with increased likelihood of DHI uptake. The strongest predictors were related to the use of e-services: Individuals who used e-services (aORs 2.48-6.08, 95% CIs 1.19-11.92) reported higher competence to use e-services (aORs 2.00-4.10, 95% CIs 1.44-5.92), had low concerns about data security (aORs 1.37-1.76, 95% CIs 1.03-2.33), believed in the benefits of digital services (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05), and had better internet connections had higher odds of uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that DHI uptake is associated with socioeconomic status, health and lifestyle factors, and, especially, individuals’ experience and attitudes toward e-services. Individuals with lower education levels, lower income, and poorer health and lifestyle habits are less likely to adopt DHIs, raising concerns about potential digital health inequities. These results underscore the need for targeted strategies to reduce barriers and ensure more equitable reach and engagement in future DHI implementations.
PMID:41364913 | DOI:10.2196/63896
