Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2026 Feb 14:1-13. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2026.2618243. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: There is limited research into the current practices and factors that may influence speech-language pathologists in the prescription and utilisation of assistive technology to support return to work goals for people with cognitive communication disorder post traumatic brain injury.
METHOD: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of speech-language pathologists in Australia and the UK who work with adults with traumatic brain injury was completed. Mixed method analysis identified the types of assistive technology used by clinicians, and highlighted barriers and facilitators to prescribing assistive technology. Descriptive statistics, reflexive thematic analysis, and content analysis were employed to analyse survey responses.
RESULT: Sixteen speech-language pathologists reported employing a range of assistive technology devices and applications to support communication and memory difficulties. Reflexive thematic analysis resulted in a central organising concept of ‘a nuanced approach’ with five themes. Content analysis highlighted barriers to assistive technology use that were consistent with previous research related to their design and function, service provision, and awareness and information.
CONCLUSION: Surveyed clinicians primarily prescribed familiar devices and inbuilt or downloadable applications. The prescription and use of assistive technology by surveyed clinicians is multifaceted, involving considerations of the individual and workplace barriers and facilitators to determine its utility.
PMID:41689428 | DOI:10.1080/17549507.2026.2618243
