Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Effect of Slice Thickness Variations on Knee Cartilage Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation Sequence

Curr Med Imaging. 2026 Feb 2. doi: 10.2174/0115734056427749260108092529. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying slice thickness on quantitative values using the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) sequence.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, 23 healthy subjects underwent the MAGiC sequence (at 3.0 T) with three slice thicknesses: 3 mm (TH3), 4 mm (TH4), and 5 mm (TH5). The T1, T2, and PD values were measured in various knee joint cartilage regions by two experienced radiologists, including the lateral femoral condyle (LFC), lateral tibial plateau (LTP), medial femoral condyle (MFC), medial tibial plateau (MTP), patella (PAT), and trochlea (TRO). The effects of varying slice thicknesses (TH4 vs. TH3 and TH5 vs. TH3) were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.025. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were also assessed.

RESULTS: Measurements of T1, T2, and PD values demonstrated high intra- and inter-rater reliability. Minimal differences were observed across slice thicknesses for T1WI, T2WI, and PDWI images. T2 and PD values showed little variation, while T1 mapping revealed significant differences. T2 values were consistent across regions, except for the LFC.

DISCUSSION: TH4 and TH5 can replace TH3 for knee joint scanning while reducing scan time, with minimal differences in anatomical depiction across sequences. MAGiC technology significantly improves efficiency by acquiring quantitative data in a single scan, demonstrating stable T2 values unaffected by slice thickness, though T1 and PD values are thickness-dependent. This technique holds clinical value for cartilage injury assessment but requires further research on the applicability of multiplanar imaging.

CONCLUSION: T2 values obtained with the MAGiC sequence are stable across TH3, TH4, and TH5, allowing for reliable cartilage T2 quantification using TH5 to reduce patient scan time.

PMID:41691665 | DOI:10.2174/0115734056427749260108092529

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala