Orthop Surg. 2026 Mar 13. doi: 10.1111/os.70277. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the multiple ligament injury of the knee joint, apart from the anterior cruciate ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament, the Posterolateral Corner and the Posteromedial Corner are two structures that are easily overlooked. If not properly identified and repaired in one stage, the knee joint may be unstable, even failure of cruciate ligament reconstruction. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the effect of knee joint recovery after PLC (Posterolateral Corner) with or without PMC (Posteromedial Corner) injury.
METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, we screened a total of 2564 patients, of which 292 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, a total of 44 people completed the study. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. We used pain visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score. Opti-knee (a portable motion analysis system) was used to evaluate the stability of the knee joint at 1 year. In our prospective cohort study, we used the unpaired Student’s t-test for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The knee joint function of PLC group and PLC combined PMC group was better than that before operation at 3 or 6 months after operation. Except for IKDC at 9-month follow-up and Tegner score at 9-month and 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: PLC and PLC combined with PMC injury showed similar prognostic effects, although the PLC group was numerically superior to the other group. We recommend primary repair and reconstruction in patients with confirmed PLC and PMC injuries to achieve the best postoperative recovery.
PMID:41826073 | DOI:10.1111/os.70277
