eNeuro. 2026 Mar 19:ENEURO.0060-26.2026. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0060-26.2026. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
The retina encodes a broad range of stimuli, adapting its computations to features like brightness, contrast, and motion. However, it is unclear whether it also adapts when switching between natural scenes and white noise. To address this, we analyzed the neural activity of male marmoset retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in response to white noise and naturalistic movies. We trained linear-nonlinear models on both stimuli, evaluated their performance, and compared their receptive fields across stimulus domains. We found that models with spatial filters trained on one stimulus ensemble were less accurate when predicting neural activity on the other compared to models trained directly on the target stimulus. This suggests that spatial processing adapts to stimulus statistics. Different RGC types exhibited distinct changes: The OFF midget cells’ receptive fields became enlarged under natural movies, resulting in a lower cutoff frequency. Parasol cells and large OFF cells did not significantly change their receptive field sizes. All cell types exhibited stronger surrounds under natural movies, resembling the whitening filters predicted by efficient coding for stimulus decorrelation, prompting us to test whether these changes were related to the different spectral content of the two stimulus types. Quantifying the effects of the filters’ enhanced surrounds on the stimulus power spectrum showed a significant contribution towards whitening only in ON parasol cells, where a whitening effect emerged regardless of the training stimulus. These results suggest that while RGCs adapt to the differences between white noise and natural movie stimuli, efficient coding can only partially account for this adaptation.Significance statement Natural scenes differ from artificial stimuli in many properties, including spatial frequency structure. How the retina adapts to these differences remains unclear. To explore this, we studied responses of four primate retinal ganglion cell types to white noise and natural stimuli and compared their receptive field properties. We found that midget cells enlarge their receptive field centers and strengthen their surrounds under natural stimulation, whereas others show enhanced surrounds without center size changes. These modifications qualitatively match predictions of efficient coding based on differences in stimulus power spectra. However, in three of four cell types, stronger surrounds did not substantially whiten responses to natural movies, contrary to theoretical expectations. Thus, efficient coding alone cannot fully account for retinal adaptation mechanisms.
PMID:41856791 | DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0060-26.2026
