Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Dec 24;37(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02088-y.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses is essential for guiding optimal surgical management. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility of serum biomarkers (CA-125, CEA), the O-RADS MRI risk score, and Risk of Malignancy Indices (RMI-I-V) in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: This retrospective study included data from consecutive patients who underwent surgical management for ovarian masses at a rural tertiary care center in Southern India over 2 years. Preoperative ultrasonography, serum CA-125, CEA levels, and O-RADS MRI risk scores were recorded. RMI-I-V were calculated for each case. Statistical analyses included Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis to assess discrimination and clinical utility across decision thresholds (5-50%).
RESULTS: A total of 129 women were evaluated-98 (75.9%) had benign, 5 (3.9%) borderline, and 26 (20.2%) malignant ovarian masses. At recommended cut-offs, all RMI models and serum biomarkers significantly differentiated between benign, borderline, and malignant cases. RMI-IV and RMI-V demonstrated the best sensitivity (92.31%), specificity (90.82% and 92.86%), and negative predictive values (97.80% and 97.85%), whereas CEA showed the poorest sensitivity (23.08%). Calibration was most accurate for RMI-V, with RMI-II and RMI-IV also performing well. Decision curve analysis confirmed the highest net clinical benefit for RMI-II and RMI-IV across thresholds of 5-50%.
CONCLUSION: RMI-based models, especially RMI-IV, demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility, supporting their use as a reliable, cost-effective tool for adnexal mass evaluation.
PMID:41442084 | DOI:10.1007/s10552-025-02088-y