Category: Nevin Manimala

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e50749. doi: 10.2196/50749.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Telehealth abortion has taken on a vital role in maintaining abortion access since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. However, little remains known about the landscape of new telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion providers that have expanded since telehealth abortion first became widely available in the United States in 2021.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) document the landscape of telehealth-only virtual clinic abortion care in the United States, (2) describe changes in the presence of virtual clinic abortion services between September 2022, following the Dobbs decision, and June 2023, and (3) identify structural factors that may perpetuate inequities in access to virtual clinic abortion care.

METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study by reviewing web search results and abortion directories to identify virtual abortion clinics in September 2022 and June 2023 and described changes in the presence of virtual clinics between these 2 periods. In June 2023, we also described each virtual clinic’s policies, including states served, costs, patient age limits, insurance acceptance, financial assistance available, and gestational limits.

RESULTS: We documented 11 virtual clinics providing telehealth abortion care in 26 states and Washington DC in September 2022. By June 2023, 20 virtual clinics were providing services in 27 states and Washington DC. Most (n=16) offered care to minors, 8 provided care until 10 weeks of pregnancy, and median costs were US $259. In addition, 2 accepted private insurance and 1 accepted Medicaid, within a limited number of states. Most (n=16) had some form of financial assistance available.

CONCLUSIONS: Virtual clinic abortion providers have proliferated since the Dobbs decision. We documented inequities in the availability of telehealth abortion care from virtual clinics, including age restrictions that exclude minors, gestational limits for care, and limited insurance and Medicaid acceptance. Notably, virtual clinic abortion care was not permitted in 11 states where in-person abortion is available.

PMID:39102679 | DOI:10.2196/50749

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e57224. doi: 10.2196/57224.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSSs) offer potential for improving health care outcomes, but their adoption among health care practitioners remains limited.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis identified predictors influencing health care practitioners’ intention to use AI-CDSSs based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Additional predictors were examined based on existing empirical evidence.

METHODS: The literature search using electronic databases, forward searches, conference programs, and personal correspondence yielded 7731 results, of which 17 (0.22%) studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analysis, relative weight analyses, and meta-analytic moderation and mediation analyses were used to examine the relationships between relevant predictor variables and the intention to use AI-CDSSs.

RESULTS: The meta-analysis results supported the application of the UTAUT to the context of the intention to use AI-CDSSs. The results showed that performance expectancy (r=0.66), effort expectancy (r=0.55), social influence (r=0.66), and facilitating conditions (r=0.66) were positively associated with the intention to use AI-CDSSs, in line with the predictions of the UTAUT. The meta-analysis further identified positive attitude (r=0.63), trust (r=0.73), anxiety (r=-0.41), perceived risk (r=-0.21), and innovativeness (r=0.54) as additional relevant predictors. Trust emerged as the most influential predictor overall. The results of the moderation analyses show that the relationship between social influence and use intention becomes weaker with increasing age. In addition, the relationship between effort expectancy and use intention was stronger for diagnostic AI-CDSSs than for devices that combined diagnostic and treatment recommendations. Finally, the relationship between facilitating conditions and use intention was mediated through performance and effort expectancy.

CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis contributes to the understanding of the predictors of intention to use AI-CDSSs based on an extended UTAUT model. More research is needed to substantiate the identified relationships and explain the observed variations in effect sizes by identifying relevant moderating factors. The research findings bear important implications for the design and implementation of training programs for health care practitioners to ease the adoption of AI-CDSSs into their practice.

PMID:39102675 | DOI:10.2196/57224

Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6893. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6893.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Prognostic factors have been well described for osteosarcoma, but analyses evaluating the further course of long-term survivors are lacking. We used the large database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) to perform such an analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The COSS database 1980-04/2019 was searched for 5-year survivors of primary high-grade central osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk. Identified patients were analyzed for their further survival outcomes, assessing potentially prognostic and predictive factors already evident at initial disease presentation and treatment as well as their disease course during the first 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS: Two thousand and nine former eligible patients were identified (median age at initial diagnosis 15.1 (2.5-63.0) years; male vs. female 1149 (57.2%) vs. 860 (42.8%); extremities vs. trunk 1927 (95.9%) vs. 82 (4.1%); extremity primaries <1/3 vs. ≥1/3 of the involved bone 997 (67.8%) vs. 474 (32.2%) (456 unknown); localized vs. primary metastatic 1881 (93.6%) vs. 128 (6.4%); osteosarcoma as a secondary malignancy 41/2009 (2.0%)). Therapy starting by chemotherapy versus primary surgery 1860 (92.6%) versus 149 (7.4%); definitive tumor surgery by limb salvage versus ablative 1347 (67.0%) versus 659 (1 no surgery, 2 unknown); tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy documented for 1765 (94.9%) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, good (<10% viable tumor) versus poor 1130 (64.0%) versus 635 (36.0%), local radiotherapy documented for 19 (0.9%) tumors. Recurrence during preceding 5 years no versus yes 1681 (83.7%) versus 328 (16.3%). Median follow-up starting 5 years after initial diagnosis 6.1 (0.002-32.2) years; 1815 survivors and 194 deaths. Overall survival after another 5/10/15/20 years 91.7%/88.9%/85.8%/83.4% for all patients; 97.5%/95.2%/92.4%/89.9% if in remission years 1-5 versus 62.7%/57.3%/53.0%/51.2% if recurrence year 1-5 (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of survival for all patients age at diagnosis (p = 0.038), tumor site (p = 0.030), having experienced the osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p < 0.001), tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression testing possible for 1759 (87.6%) patients with complete dataset: Having had a recurrence in years 1-5 (p < 0.001), older age at diagnosis (p = 0.009), and osteosarcoma as secondary malignancy (p = 0.013) retained significance.

DISCUSSION: Highly important predictors of death such as the extent of tumor response to chemotherapy no longer remain valid after 5-year survival. The individual history of malignancies and their outcomes seems to gain pivotal importance.

CONCLUSION: This benchmark analysis clearly defined risk factors for the further course of 5-year survivors from osteosarcoma. It argues for large disease-oriented databases as well as for very long follow-up periods. Novel findings will most likely require innovative statistical models to analyze such cohorts.

PMID:39102672 | DOI:10.1002/cam4.6893

Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug 5:1-8. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2373257. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Previous disaster research exploring mental health consequences has been conducted after a single disaster. Community mental health nurses offer critical support in the aftermath of a disaster through complex assessments, psychosocial education and treatment. This research examines help-seeking behaviors in a Greater Houston community struggling with two simultaneous disasters, a historic winter freeze amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Three Mental Health Crisis clinics, staffed by an interdisciplinary team, offered walk-in crisis services. The study characterizes adults who accessed services and describes those who accepted follow-up, subsidized behavioral health therapy or case management, including populations experiencing health disparities. Statistical analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Those who recognized the need for behavioral health care and accessed episodic care differed from those who accepted follow-up care. The population that was more likely to accept follow up care largely consisted of females, individuals without a previously existing mental health condition, those who reported trauma exposure, and young adults of Hispanic/Latino origin. Nurses can leverage female support to inspire male adults to seek care and advocate for increased resources and training to support culturally relevant care. Nurses and the interdisciplinary team need to assess for trauma exposure, as it influences care decisions.

PMID:39102666 | DOI:10.1080/01612840.2024.2373257

Braz J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 5. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3623. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Sleep problems are common in patients with psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia. Although pharmacological methods are at the forefront of treatment, this method has some drawbacks. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an option for the treatment of individuals with insomnia. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in its use in patients with psychotic disorders. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CBT-I on sleep problems in patients with psychotic disorders.

METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO (MEDLINE) databases to identify relevant studies. The study included RCTs and uncontrolled studies that focused on participants diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorders not otherwise specified, bipolar disorders, or unipolar depression with psychotic features, who had sleep problems for at least one month, and who were receiving treatment. The initial search yielded 246 studies, and eight studies were selected for the meta-analysis after screening and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria.The statistical analysis was conducted using the R software.

RESULTS: CBT-I significantly ameliorates insomnia and sleep quality in patients with psychotic disorders during short and long-term periods. In addition to this, CBT-I leads to a significant improvement in psychotic symptoms in the short-term period and contributes significantly to the improvement in mental well-being in both short and long-term periods.

CONCLUSIONS: CBT-I is an effective and valuable method for sleep problems in patients with psychotic disorders and its use is recommended to be widespread.

PMID:39102660 | DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3623

Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13951. doi: 10.1111/hex.13951.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows that online interventions could prevent depression. However, to improve the effectiveness of preventive online interventions in individuals with subthreshold depression, it is worthwhile to study factors influencing intervention outcomes. Outcome expectancy has been shown to predict treatment outcomes in psychotherapy for depression. However, little is known about whether this also applies to depression prevention. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of participants’ outcome expectancy in an online depression prevention intervention.

METHODS: A secondary data analysis was conducted using data from two randomised-controlled trials (N = 304). Multilevel modelling was used to explore the effect of outcome expectancy on depressive symptoms and close-to-symptom-free status postintervention (6-7 weeks) and at follow-up (3-6 months). In a subsample (n = 102), Cox regression was applied to assess the effect on depression onset within 12 months. Explorative analyses included baseline characteristics as possible moderators. Outcome expectancy did not predict posttreatment outcomes or the onset of depression.

RESULTS: Small effects were observed at follow-up for depressive symptoms (β = -.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.75, -0.03], p = .032, p_adjusted = .130) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.06, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.11], p = .013, p_adjusted = 0.064), but statistical significance was not maintained when controlling for multiple testing. Moderator analyses indicated that expectancy could be more influential for females and individuals with higher initial symptom severity.

CONCLUSION: More thoroughly designed, predictive studies targeting outcome expectancy are necessary to assess the full impact of the construct for effective depression prevention.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This secondary analysis did not involve patients, service users, care-givers, people with lived experience or members of the public. However, the findings incorporate the expectations of participants using the preventive online intervention, and these exploratory findings may inform the future involvement of participants in the design of indicated depression prevention interventions for adults.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Original studies: DRKS00004709, DRKS00005973; secondary analysis: osf.io/9xj6a.

PMID:39102655 | DOI:10.1111/hex.13951

JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Aug;8:e2400167. doi: 10.1200/PO.24.00167.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Approximately 5%-10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have an inherited basis, yet uptake of genetic testing remains low and subject to disparities. This study compared two genetic testing pathways available to patients referred to a provincial cancer center, BC Cancer: a traditional hereditary cancer clinic-initiated testing (HCT) pathway and a new oncology clinic-initiated testing (OCT) pathway.

METHODS: Study subjects were patients with confirmed PDAC referred for genetic testing through the HCT or OCT pathway between June 1, 2020, and February 1, 2022. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics and testing outcomes.

RESULTS: The study population was 397 patients (HCT, n = 279 and OCT, n = 118). OCT patients were more likely to have non-European ethnicity compared with HCT patients (41.9% v 25.6%, P = .004), to have earlier-stage disease (P = .012), and to have better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status than the HCT group (P = .001). A total of 306 patients completed testing (77%). OCT patients had higher test completion rates than HCT patients (odds ratio, 3.74 [95% CI, 1.66 to 9.62]). Median time for results was shorter in OCT than in HCT (53 days [IQR, 44-76] v 107 days [IQR, 63.8-158.3]). Pancreatic cancer susceptibility pathogenic gene variants were identified in 8.5% (26/306).

CONCLUSION: The real-world observations in our study show that oncology clinic-initiated hereditary testing is more effective and faster than testing through hereditary cancer clinic referrals and reaches a more ethnically diverse population. This has important implications for publicly funded environments with limited resources for genetic counseling.

PMID:39102633 | DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00167

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 5:JCO2302420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02420. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with chemotherapy-responsive advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are usually observed after 6 months of gemcitabine-based therapy. There is limited prospective evidence for maintenance strategies after chemotherapy.

METHODS: This investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized, integrated phase II-III study enrolled adult patients with advanced BTC from two cancer centers in India. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma who had at least disease stabilization after 6 months of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to either active surveillance or switch maintenance, which was a combination of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenous once every 21 days plus erlotinib 100 mg once daily. Both arms were continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient decision to withdraw. The primary end point of the phase II component of the trial was investigator-evaluated progression-free survival. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/05/019323I).

RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 98 patients were randomly assigned to active surveillance (n = 49) or bevacizumab-erlotinib (n = 49). A majority of patients had gallbladder cancer (80%). The median follow-up was 13.4 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.47 to 3.64) in the active surveillance group versus 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.53 to 7.04) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0·74]; P = .0013). The most common grade 3 class-specific adverse events associated with bevacizumab-erlotinib were acneiform rash 1 (2%) and oral stomatitis 1 (2%) with erlotinib and bleeding 1 (2%) with bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib as switch maintenance improves progression-free survival with an acceptable safety profile compared with active surveillance in patients with advanced BTCs in this phase II study. The trial moves on to the phase III component to evaluate improvement in overall survival.

PMID:39102628 | DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.02420

Dementia (London). 2024 Aug 5:14713012241270805. doi: 10.1177/14713012241270805. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Group activities are commonly offered to residents of nursing homes, and increasingly with a person-centred care approach. The aim of this study is to compare the impacts of a Montessori-based reading activity with a more traditional reading activity.

METHOD: A multiple baseline design was used, with 3 groups of 5 older adults with moderate to severe dementia. All sessions were videorecorded and analysed by independent judges, blinded to our hypotheses and conditions. Impacts of the type of activity (storytelling or Montessori-based reading) on verbal interactions, engagement level, affect and behavioural aspects were estimated with both visual analyses and statistical analyses using the between-case standardised mean differences method.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found in favour of the Montessori-based activities with regard to the number of verbal interactions, constructive and passive engagement and positive affect expressed, with moderate to large effect size (from 0.46 to 1.66).

CONCLUSION: The Montessori-based reading group activity really seems to be preferable to a more traditional storytelling activity, with multiple benefits for residents. Depending on the preserved abilities and interests of the participants, it can also be aimed at people with severe dementia.

PMID:39102610 | DOI:10.1177/14713012241270805

Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Aug;43(8):1180-1189. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00933.

ABSTRACT

Trauma activation fees are intended to help trauma centers cover the costs of providing lifesaving care at all times, but they have fallen under greater scrutiny because of a lack of regulation and wide variability in charges. We leveraged the federal Hospital Price Transparency rule to systematically describe trauma activation fees as captured in the Turquoise Health database for all Level I-III trauma centers nationally and across payer types. As of April 18, 2023, a total of 38 percent of US trauma centers published trauma activation fees. These fees varied widely by payer type. The minimum fee charged was $40 (for a Medicaid contract); the maximum fees charged were $28,356 (self-pay) and $28,893 (commercial payers). Trauma centers that were larger, metropolitan, located in the West, and associated with proprietary (investor-owned, for-profit) hospitals had higher trauma activation fees. Proprietary hospitals posted fees that were 60 percent higher than those published by public, nonfederal hospitals. Unmerited variation in trauma activation fees may suggest that the current funding strategy is equitable neither for trauma centers nor for the severely injured patients who rely on them for lifesaving care.

PMID:39102607 | DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00933