Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Jan 30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003135. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the criterion validity of Activities Completed over Time (ACT24), an automated previous day recall tool designed for mobile devices for 1) estimating sedentary vs active time compared to an activPAL; and 2) estimating time spent in activity domains (e.g., work, household, leisure) compared to direct observation (DO).
METHODS: Over a 7-day study period, 53 participants were sent invitations to complete three automated ACT24 recalls and to wear an activPAL device. A subset (N = 24) consented to two, 3-hour video recorded DO sessions. activPAL and ACT24 data were matched by date, and agreement for sedentary versus active time was compared between methods using paired t-tests for mean differences and spearman correlations. We compared DO and ACT24 results by domain for overall time-use and separately for sedentary and active time using Kappa statistics and tested mean differences with linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Compared to the activPAL, the mean difference in ACT24 sedentary time was 1.9% (mean [95%CI] -0.17 [-0.75,0.40] hrs/day) and the mean difference for ACT24 active time was 2.2% (0.14 [-0.32,0.60] hrs/day). Correlations were R = 0.61 (95% CI: [0.39, 0.76]) and R = 0.65 (0.44, 0.78) for sedentary and active time, respectively. Domain-specific agreement was substantial for leisure-time, work, and shopping/errands (Kappa range: 0.63-0.79), moderate for transportation (Kappa = 0.49) and fair for personal care and household activities (Kappa: 0.24 and 0.33). ACT24 estimates of average time within each domain were not significantly different than DO.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that ACT24 is accurate for group-level estimation of active and sedentary time. Domain-specific agreement tended to be higher for more commonly reported activities and those that were of longer duration.
PMID:36719650 | DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003135