J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Dec 29:S1058-2746(21)00865-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.017. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lateral Epicondylitis is common in workers who perform repetitive movements of the entire upper limb. Approximately 85% to 90% respond satisfactorily to conservative treatment, but in resistant patients, surgical treatment is considered. Classic open surgery is successful between 70% and 97%, similar to more modern techniques such as arthroscopy. We tried to demonstrate the superiority of the Wolf technique in clinical results. The goals of this study were to compare the functional and pain outcomes of arthroscopic surgery with open surgery using fasciotomy as the wolf technique in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 47 working-age patients with resistant lateral epicondylitis: 27 underwent surgery arthroscopically, and 20 underwent open surgery. Pre- and postsurgical VAS and function were assessed using DASH, MEPS and BMRS scales, as well as the return to their previous work and the surgical time.
RESULTS: The reduction in VAS showed no statistically significant differences between the groups (5.26 in arthroscopy versus 5.75 in fasciotomy, p = 0.5), QuickDash (19 versus 19.4 with p = 0.9), MEPS (82 versus 81.5 with p = 0.8) or BMRS (81.9 versus 82.6 with p = 0.9). The differences in terms of time off were also not statistically significant. The days of work leave in the arthroscopy group corresponded on average 83.78 days, and in the Wolff group, it corresponded to 89.95 days. The mean surgical time in the arthroscopic intervention group was 44.2 minutes and in the fasciotomy group was 27.5 minutes, showing statistically significant results (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic surgery and open surgery in lateral epicondylitis techniques provide similar functional results and pain reduction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.
PMID:34973424 | DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.017