J Food Prot. 2021 Jul 15. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-028. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Based upon regulatory and food industry-driven food safety standards, there is a need for rapid, accurate methods for assessing sanitary conditions. A commonly utilized assay is based on the assessment of the biochemical molecule, adenosine triphosphate (ATP). A more recent assay (AXP) targets the cumulative presence of ATP and its dephosphorylated homologues, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). Yet, there is little information that compares the practical performance of these two assays. This work examined these two assay types with a comparative study in a Grade A dairy foods processing plant and a licensed and inspected meat processing facility. A total of 1,920 concomitant analyses were conducted with main variables of assay type, processing facility type and hygiene zone category. Statistical process control methodology was used to calculate 95% confidence control limits (CL); data beyond those limits were considered contamination events. Results demonstrated that, overall, the AXP assay detected contamination events approximately two times more often than the ATP-only based assay. This increase in the rate of contamination event detection was especially more prevalent in the meat processing facility where, across all hygienic zones, there were 38 vs. 85 contaminations events detected for the ATP and AXP assays, respectively. Across hygiene zones, the AXP data displayed either an equal or increased incidence of soil detection compared to data from the ATP assay. This study provides applied evidence that assays solely dependent on ATP concentrations are less able to detect soil contaminants under conditions that favor ATP dephosphorylation reactions.
PMID:34265064 | DOI:10.4315/JFP-21-028