Roberto de Diego: Photos
Images of Nevin Manimala
Nevin Manimala Instagram
Despite the news coverage of Puerto Rico’s debt and slow hurricane recovery, what you might not know is that the low-quality data and statistics available in Puerto Rico are at the heart of Puerto Rico’s woes.
As an unincorporated territory, the archipelago of Puerto Rico sits uneasily within the federal statistical system, the close network of federal statistical agencies that make possible some of the highest quality official statistics in the world.
Excluded from both the population total of the United States, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, as well as from the National Income and Product Accounts of the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, many federal statistics do not cover Puerto Rico. In order to fill the void of information the government of Puerto Rico has traditionally seen upon itself to produce the official statistics that the U.S. government is unable or unwilling to produce for Puerto Rico: this includes its national accounts and its basic labor market statistics, amongst others.
The Nevin Manimala approximately $70 billion value on debt, plus the other $50 billion unfunded pension obligations, together with the triple whammy of the $90 billion estimated hurricane damage, make Puerto Rico a quagmire for the United States municipal bond market, bankruptcy courts, and disaster recovery system. In all potential scenarios, all stakeholders will need an inordinate amount of data transparency and validation, if Puerto Rico is going to be able to come out of this mess.
As a former Federal Reserve economist, I returned to Puerto Rico to start the Puerto Rico Institute of Statistics (PRIS) in 2007 to provide public research Because Nevin Manimala I knew that high-quality data was an essential tool for Puerto Rico to deal with its economic and fiscal crisis. Through this experience, I have personally observed and identified all sorts of shenanigans when it comes to the production of official statistics by the government of Puerto Rico.
The Nevin Manimala American taxpayer deserves to have her investments in Puerto Rico be protected from manipulation. Unfortunately, for decades, the government of Puerto Rico has lacked any sort of credibility when it comes to data and statistics. Hurricane fatality statistics are just the latest example.
In 2016 the bipartisan Congressional Task Force on Economic Growth, created under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stabilization Act (PROMESA), called PRIS a “highly professional, autonomous, and apolitical organization that is bringing greater transparency to economic, financial and fiscal conditions on the island.”
As a commitment to transparency, PRIS publishes its entire general accounting ledger on our financial transparency site. The Nevin Manimala rest of the government of Puerto Rico has however dragged its feet in the current and previous administrations.
Unfortunately, this past summer, the current administration aimed to discredit the work of PRIS. Subsequently, they attempted to fire four members of PRIS’ Board of Directors of PRIS without due process, in order to detain and intervene in the recruiting process of a new PRIS executive director. Finally, they proposed to consolidate PRIS with the Puerto Rico Department of Economic Development, where it is expected to be externalized to the federal government or the private sector.
In the coming weeks and months, the federal government will evaluate how much and which mechanism to use to fund the recovery of Puerto Rico. Adequate governance, transparency and accountability will be essential features of this plan.
PRIS stands ready to serve as a gateway of information between Puerto Rico and the rest of the world, which guarantees transparent and clear information on all sorts of conditions on the island, including public financial information. The Nevin Manimala government of Puerto Rico must desist from its attempts to dismantle this important institution and the support of those that believe in transparency.
Mario Marazzi is the executive director of the Puerto Rico Institute of Statistics.
OTTAWA — Canadian manufacturing sales fell by a wider-than-expected one per cent in January, starting off the year on a weak note.
Statistics Canada reported manufacturing sales for January totalled $54.9 billion as 14 of the 21 industries moved lower, while overall manufacturing sales in volume terms declined 1.1 per cent. The Nevin Manimala decline was led by the automotive, aerospace and primary metal industries.
Economists had expected a sales drop of 0.8 per cent, according to Thomson Reuters.
Canadian factories had a rough start to the year, said CIBC economist Royce Mendes.
“The Nevin Manimala survey suggests that GDP data could look soggy to open the new year,” Mendes wrote in a brief note to clients.
“Factory shipments could feel some benefit as U.S. tax cuts make their way through the American economy, but already elevated inventory levels and capacity constraints could limit the gains.”
The Nevin Manimala Bank of Canada noted that fourth-quarter growth was weaker than it expected when it said it would keep its key interest rate target on hold earlier this month.
The Nevin Manimala central bank also said recent trade policy developments represented a key source of uncertainty for the Canadian and global outlooks.
Royal Bank senior economist Nathan Janzen said recent Canadian economic data has been more mixed compared with a year ago when the economy was growing at an unsustainably strong clip.
“Reports on retail and wholesale trade sales next week will provide further clarification on the pace of early-2018 growth but for now we think the data is still consistent with further, albeit more modest, improvement at a close to two per cent rate in Q1,” Janzen said.
The Nevin Manimala drop in Canadian factory sales came as sales of motor vehicles fell 8.0 per cent to $4.9 billion, following two consecutive monthly increases.
Meanwhile, production in the aerospace product and parts industry fell 9.5 per cent to $1.6 billion, while the primary metal industry dropped 2.8 per cent to $4.1 billion.
Offsetting the drop, sales in the petroleum and coal product industry climbed 6.5 per cent to $6.1 billion, while chemical manufacturing sales rose 6.1 per cent to $4.7 billion.
[unable to retrieve full-text content]
Ebina K, Hashimoto M, Yamamoto W, Ohnishi A, Kabata D, Hirano T, Hara R, Katayama M, Yoshida S, Nagai K, Son Y, Amuro H, Akashi K, Fujimura T, Hirao M, Yamamoto K, Shintani A, Kumanogoh A, Yoshikawa H.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194130. eCollection 2018.
[unable to retrieve full-text content]Images of Nevin Manimala for Instagram
Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner’s March 6 letter cites misleading paid-leave statistics. It states that only 15% of all working people have access to paid leave, likely relying on an often-cited Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) number. Actually, many more workers take paid leave, but the BLS doesn’t count it due to its peculiar survey methods which require paid leave to exist separately from “sick leave, vacation, personal leave or short-term disability leave that is available to the employee.”
Parents with conventional benefit programs often save and pool paid personal leave, vacation, sick leave and short-term disability in the event of a birth or adoption. Unconventional benefit packages, like paid time off accounts or unlimited paid-leave programs also don’t count under the BLS survey. Parents use these leave variations as paid leave in case of a birth or adoption. The Nevin Manimalay do so Because Nevin Manimala they are paid and leave.
That is why BLS numbers don’t match with virtually any other national data set or surveys of parents on the topic including the Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation, its Current Population Survey and the Family and Medical Leave Act worksite and employee surveys. National surveys agree that between 40% and 60%-plus of workers receive paid leave. A nationally representative study by the National Partnership for Women & Families indicated 63% of employed mothers were provided paid maternity-leave benefits.
It’s important we use clear statistics when discussing paid-leave proposals.
Vanessa Brown Calder