Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 3;104(1):e41220. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041220.
ABSTRACT
This study compares the efficacy of the TiRobot with traditional external aiming frames in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails. A cohort of 44 patients, who underwent intramedullary nailing treatment for femoral fractures between October 2020 and October 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. Participants were allocated into 2 groups. The observation group (n = 22) received TiRobot assistance for distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails, and the control group (n = 22) was managed using conventional external aiming frames. Key variables included the first-attempt success rate of distal locking, number of fluoroscopic exposures, time to achieve locking, and volume of intraoperative blood loss. The observation group, assisted by TiRobot, achieved a significantly higher first-attempt success rate of 90.9%, as compared to 54.5% in the control group. All initial failures were subsequently managed manually, with a statistically significant difference noted between the groups (P < .05). Furthermore, the observation group required fewer fluoroscopic exposures (11.00 ± 2.93) than the control group (19.68 ± 16.28) (P < .05). The time to achieve locking was significantly shorter in the observation group (14.05 ± 3.37 min) compared to the control group (24.41 ± 14.93 min) (P < .05). The volume of intraoperative blood loss was reduced in the observation group (54.55 ± 5.54 mL) versus the control group (60.45 ± 11.01 mL) (P < .05). The incorporation of TiRobot in the distal locking of femoral intramedullary nailing prominently enhances the first-attempt success rate, reduces the procedural time and intraoperative blood loss, and diminishes the radiation exposure for both healthcare providers and patients.
PMID:40184090 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000041220