Nevin Manimala

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):228-241. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230211R2.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical scribes have been utilized to reduce electronic health record (EHR) associated documentation burden. Although evidence suggests benefits to scribes, no large-scale studies have quantitatively evaluated scribe impact on physician documentation across clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician EHR documentation behaviors and performance.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used EHR audit log data from a large academic health system to evaluate clinical documentation for all ambulatory encounters between January 2014 and December 2019 to evaluate the effect of scribes on physician documentation behaviors. Scribe services were provided on a first-come, first-served basis on physician request. Based on a physician’s scribe use, encounters were grouped into 3 categories: never using a scribe, prescribe (before scribe use), or using a scribe. Outcomes included chart closure time, the proportion of delinquent charts, and charts closed after-hours.

RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five physicians (23% scribe users) across 29 medical subspecialties, encompassing 1,132,487 encounters, were included in the analysis. At baseline, scribe users had higher chart closure time, delinquent charts, and after-hours documentation than physicians who never used scribes. Among scribe users, the difference in outcome measures postscribe compared with baseline varied, and using a scribe rarely resulted in outcome measures approaching a range similar to the performance levels of nonusing physicians. In addition, there was variability in outcome measures across medical specialties and within similar subspecialties.

CONCLUSION: Although scribes may improve documentation efficiency among some physicians, not all will improve EHR-related documentation practices. Different strategies may help to optimize documentation behaviors of physician-scribe dyads and maximize outcomes of scribe implementation.

PMID:38740487 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230211R2

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):196-205. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230319R1.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Food insecurity (FI) is a hidden epidemic associated with worsening health outcomes affecting 33.8 million people in the US in 2021. Although studies demonstrate the importance of health care clinician assessment of a patient’s food insecurity, little is known about whether Family Medicine clinicians (FMC) discuss FI with patients and what barriers influence their ability to communicate about FI. This study evaluated FM clinicians’ food insecurity screening practices to evaluate screening disparities and identify barriers that influence the decision to communicate about FI.

METHODS: Data were gathered and analyzed as part of the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine’s Educational Research Alliance survey of Family Medicine general membership.

RESULTS: The majority of respondents reported (66.9%) that their practice has a screening system for food insecurity, and most practices used a verbal screen with staff other than the clinician (41%) at specific visits (63.8%). Clinicians reported “rarely or never asking about FI” 40% of the time and only asking “always or frequently” 6.7% of the time. Inadequate time during appointments (44.5%) and other medical issues taking priority (29.4%) were identified as the most common barriers. The lack of resources available in the community was a significant barrier for clinicians who worked in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides insight into food insecurity screening disparities and identifies obstacles to FMC screening, such as time constraints, lack of resources, and knowledge of available resources. Understanding current communication practices could create opportunities for interventions to identify food insecurity and impact “Food as Medicine.”

PMID:38740486 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230319R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):349-350. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230326R1.

ABSTRACT

The singular label of “Asian” obscures socioeconomic differences between Asian ethnic groups that affect matriculation into the field of medicine. Using data from American Board of Family Medicine Examination candidates in 2023, we found that compared to the US population, among Asian-American family physicians, Indians were present at higher rates, while Chinese and Filipinos were underrepresented, suggesting the importance of continued disaggregation of Asian ethnicities in medicine.

PMID:38740485 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230326R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):270-278. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230218R1.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have documented salary differences between male and female physicians. For many specialties, this wage gap has been explored by controlling for measurable factors that influence pay such as productivity, work-life balance, and practice patterns. In family medicine where practice activities differ widely between physicians, it is important to understand what measurable factors may be contributing to the gender wage gap, so that employers and policymakers and can address unjust disparities.

METHODS: We used data from the 2017 to 2020 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) National Graduate Survey (NGS) which is administered to family physicians 3 years after residency (n = 8608; response rate = 63.9%, 56.2% female). The survey collects clinical income and practice patterns. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed, which included variables on hours worked, degree type, principal professional activity, rural/urban, and region.

RESULTS: Although early-career family physician incomes averaged $225,278, female respondents reported incomes that were $43,566 (17%) lower than those of male respondents (P = .001). Generally, female respondents tended toward lower-earning principal professional activities and US regions; worked fewer hours (2.9 per week); and tended to work more frequently in urban settings. However, in adjusted models, this gap in income only fell to $31,804 (13% lower than male respondents, P = .001).

CONCLUSION: Even after controlling for measurable factors such as hours worked, degree type, principal professional activity, population density, and region, a significant wage gap persists. Interventions should be taken to eliminate gender bias in wage determinations for family physicians.

PMID:38740481 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230218R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):242-250. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230165R2.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Filipinos have unique social determinants of health, cultural values, and beliefs that contribute to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. We aimed to identify Filipino values, practices, and belief systems that influenced health care access and utilization.

METHODS: We conducted 1-on-1 semistructured interviews with self-identified Filipino patients. Our qualitative study utilized a constant-comparative approach for data collection, thematic coding, and interpretive analysis.

RESULTS: We interviewed 20 Filipinos in a remote rural community to assess structural and social challenges experienced when interacting with the health care system. Our results suggest that Filipinos regard culture and language as pillars of health access. Filipinos trust clinicians who exhibited positive tone and body language as well as relatable and understandable communication. These traits are features of Pakikisama, a Filipino trait/value of “comfortableness and getting along with others.” Relatability and intercultural values familiarity increased Filipino trust in a health care clinician. Filipinos may lack understanding about how to navigate the US Health care system, which can dissuade access to care.

CONCLUSIONS: For the Filipino community, culture and language are fundamental components of health access. Health care systems have the opportunity to both improve intercultural clinical training and increase representation among clinicians and support staff to improve care delivery and navigation of health services. Participants reported not routinely relying on health care navigators.

PMID:38740480 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230165R2

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):321-323. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230347R1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care clinicians do not adhere to national and international guidelines recommending pulmonary function testing (PFTs) in patients with suspected asthma. Little is known about why that occurs. Our objective was to assess clinician focused barriers to ordering PFTs.

METHODS: An internet-based 11-item survey of primary care clinicians at a large safety-net institution was conducted between August 2021 and November 2021. This survey assessed barriers and possible electronic health record (EHR) solutions to ordering PFTs. One of the survey questions contained an open-ended question about barriers which was analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS: The survey response rate was 59% (117/200). The top 3 reported barriers included beliefs that testing will not change management, distance to testing site, and the physical effort it takes to complete testing. Clinicians were in favor of an EHR intervention to prompt them to order PFTs. Responses to the open-ended question also conveyed that objective testing does not change management.

DISCUSSION: PFTs improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce inappropriate therapies. Of the barriers we identified, the most modifiable is to educate clinicians about how PFTs can change management. That in conjunction with an EHR prompt, which clinicians approved of, may lead to guideline congruent and improved quality in asthma care.

PMID:38740479 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230347R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):309-315. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230222R1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Time to meet privately with a health care provider can support optimal adolescent health, but numerous barriers exist to implementing this practice routinely.

METHODS: We examined parent reports on their children aged 12 to 17 from a nationally generalizable sample to quantify the presence of time alone with health care providers at the state and national level, as well as socio-contextual correlates using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: We estimated that only 1 in 2 adolescents had a confidential discussion at their last medical visit. Certain child, family, and health care factors were associated with lower likelihood for having had confidential discussions. Specifically, adolescents who were Asian; did not have mental, emotional, or behavioral problems; were uninsured; or lived in households with parents who were immigrants, less educated, or did not speak English had significantly lower odds for having had time alone compared with referent groups.

DISCUSSION: Clinical and structural efforts to rectify these gaps may assist a broader share of youth in benefiting from private health care discussions with providers.

PMID:38740477 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230222R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):251-260. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230221R1.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multimorbidity rates are both increasing in prevalence across age ranges, and also increasing in diagnostic importance within and outside the family medicine clinic. Here we aim to describe the course of multimorbidity across the lifespan.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study across 211,953 patients from a large northeastern health care system. Past medical histories were collected in the form of ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Rates of multimorbidity were calculated from comorbid diagnoses defined from the ICD10 codes identified in the past medical histories.

RESULTS: We identify 4 main age groups of diagnosis and multimorbidity. Ages 0 to 10 contain diagnoses which are infectious or respiratory, whereas ages 10 to 40 are related to mental health. From ages 40 to 70 there is an emergence of alcohol use disorders and cardiometabolic disorders. And ages 70 to 90 are predominantly long-term sequelae of the most common cardiometabolic disorders. The mortality of the whole population over the study period was 5.7%, whereas the multimorbidity with the highest mortality across the study period was Circulatory Disorders-Circulatory Disorders at 23.1%.

CONCLUSION: The results from this study provide a comparison for the presence of multimorbidity within age cohorts longitudinally across the population. These patterns of comorbidity can assist in the allocation to practice resources that will best support the common conditions that patients need assistance with, especially as the patients transition between pediatric, adult, and geriatric care. Future work examining and comparing multimorbidity indices is warranted.

PMID:38740476 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230221R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):279-289. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230369R1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The potential for machine learning (ML) to enhance the efficiency of medical specialty boards has not been explored. We applied unsupervised ML to identify archetypes among American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Diplomates regarding their practice characteristics and motivations for participating in continuing certification, then examined associations between motivation patterns and key recertification outcomes.

METHODS: Diplomates responding to the 2017 to 2021 ABFM Family Medicine continuing certification examination surveys selected motivations for choosing to continue certification. We used Chi-squared tests to examine difference proportions of Diplomates failing their first recertification examination attempt who endorsed different motivations for maintaining certification. Unsupervised ML techniques were applied to generate clusters of physicians with similar practice characteristics and motivations for recertifying. Controlling for physician demographic variables, we used logistic regression to examine the effect of motivation clusters on recertification examination success and validated the ML clusters by comparison with a previously created classification schema developed by experts.

RESULTS: ML clusters largely recapitulated the intrinsic/extrinsic framework devised by experts previously. However, the identified clusters achieved a more equal partitioning of Diplomates into homogenous groups. In both ML and human clusters, physicians with mainly extrinsic or mixed motivations had lower rates of examination failure than those who were intrinsically motivated.

DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using ML to supplement and enhance human interpretation of board certification data. We discuss implications of this demonstration study for the interaction between specialty boards and physician Diplomates.

PMID:38740475 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230369R1

J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):346-348. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.240102R0.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38740473 | DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.240102R0