JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411656. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11656.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38771580 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11656
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411656. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11656.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38771580 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11656
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12383.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38771579 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12383
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12437.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38771578 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12437
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e247535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7535.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: While β-blockers are associated with decreased mortality in cardiovascular disease (CVD), exacerbation-prone patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who received metoprolol in the Beta-Blockers for the Prevention of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (BLOCK-COPD) trial experienced increased risk of exacerbations requiring hospitalization. However, the study excluded individuals with established indications for the drug, raising questions about the overall risk and benefit in patients with COPD following acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether β-blocker prescription at hospital discharge is associated with increased risk of mortality or adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes in patients with COPD and AMI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study with 6 months of follow-up enrolled patients aged 35 years or older with COPD who underwent cardiac catheterization for AMI at 18 BLOCK-COPD network hospitals in the US from June 2020 through May 2022.
EXPOSURE: Prescription for any β-blocker at hospital discharge.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to the composite outcome of death or all-cause hospitalization or revascularization. Secondary outcomes included death, hospitalization, or revascularization for CVD events, death or hospitalization for COPD or respiratory events, and treatment for COPD exacerbations.
RESULTS: Among 3531 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for AMI, prevalence of COPD was 17.1% (95% CI, 15.8%-18.4%). Of 579 total patients with COPD and AMI, 502 (86.7%) were prescribed a β-blocker at discharge. Among the 562 patients with COPD included in the final analysis, median age was 70.0 years (range, 38.0-94.0 years) and 329 (58.5%) were male; 553 of the 579 patients (95.5%) had follow-up information. Among those discharged with β-blockers, there was no increased risk of the primary end point of all-cause mortality, revascularization, or hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.66-1.54; P = .96) or of cardiovascular events (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.65-1.92; P = .69), COPD-related or respiratory events (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.66; P = .48), or treatment for COPD exacerbations (rate ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.53-1.91; P = .98).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, β-blocker prescription at hospital discharge was not associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD and AMI. These findings support use of β-blockers in patients with COPD and recent AMI.
PMID:38771577 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7535
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11707.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Plant-based diets are increasing in popularity due, in part, to their health benefits for selected cardiometabolic diseases as well as favorable environmental impact. Little is known about how such a diet is related to gout risk.
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between adherence to a plant-based diet (including healthy and unhealthy versions of this diet), as well as its 18 individual food groups, and incident gout.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study used data from population-based cohorts of US men and women enrolled in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2012) and Nurses’ Health Study (1984-2010). Participants were men and women free of gout at baseline. Statistical analyses were performed over March 2020 to August 2023.
EXPOSURES: An overall plant-based diet index (PDI), as well as healthy (hPDI) and unhealthy (uPDI) versions of this index that emphasize healthy and less healthy plant-based foods, respectively. These diet indices were comprised of 18 food groups, assessed using a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident cases of gout that were confirmed with a supplementary questionnaire to meet the preliminary American College of Rheumatology survey criteria for gout. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate multivariable-adjusted associations of all 3 PDIs with incident gout using quintiles (Q) of adherence.
RESULTS: Among a total of 122 679 participants (mean [SD] age, 53.8 [9.8] years among 43 703 men; mean [SD] age, 50.9 [7.2] years among 78 976 women) over 2 704 899 person-years of follow-up, 2709 participants experienced incident gout. The overall PDI was not significantly associated with gout in either cohort (Q5 vs Q1 pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.89-1.17]; P for trend = .63). In the pooled analysis, hPDI was significantly inversely associated with risk of gout (Q5 vs Q1 HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.91]; P for trend = .002), while the uPDI was positively associated with risk of gout (Q5 vs Q1 HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33]; P for trend = .02), particularly in women (Q5 vs Q1 HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.62]; P for trend = .01). In analysis of individual food groups, higher intakes of certain healthy plant foods, such as whole grains (pooled HR per 1 serving/d, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89-0.97]) and tea and coffee (pooled HR per 1 serving/d, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.97]), as well as dairy (pooled HR per 1 serving/d, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]), were independently associated with a lower risk of gout, while selected unhealthy plant foods, such as fruit juice (pooled HR per 1 serving/d, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00-1.13]) and sugar-sweetened beverages (pooled HR per 1 serving/d, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.26]) were associated with increased risk of gout.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this prospective cohort study of PDIs and gout support current dietary recommendations to increase consumption of healthy plant foods while lowering intake of unhealthy plant foods to mitigate gout risk.
PMID:38771576 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11707
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412192. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12192.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based weight management treatments (WMTs) are underused; strategies are needed to increase WMT use and patients’ weight loss.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of a primary care-based weight navigation program (WNP) with WMT use and weight loss.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study comprised a retrospective evaluation of a quality improvement program conducted from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Data analysis was performed from August 2, 2022, to March 7, 2024. Adults with obesity and 1 or more weight-related condition from intervention and control sites in a large academic health system in the Midwestern US were propensity matched on sociodemographic and clinical factors.
EXPOSURE: WNP, in which American Board of Obesity Medicine-certified primary care physicians offered weight-focused visits and guided patients’ selection of preference-sensitive WMTs.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were feasibility measures, including rates of referral to and engagement in the WNP. Secondary outcomes were mean weight loss, percentage of patients achieving 5% or more and 10% or more weight loss, referral to WMTs, and number of antiobesity medication prescriptions at 12 months.
RESULTS: Of 264 patients, 181 (68.6%) were female and mean (SD) age was 49.5 (13.0) years; there were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between WNP patients (n = 132) and matched controls (n = 132). Of 1159 WNP-eligible patients, 219 (18.9%) were referred to the WNP and 132 (11.4%) completed a visit. In a difference-in-differences analysis, WNP patients lost 4.9 kg more than matched controls (95% CI, 2.11-7.76; P < .001), had 4.4% greater weight loss (95% CI, 2.2%-6.4%; P < .001), and were more likely to achieve 5% or more weight loss (odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.54-5.58); average marginal effects, 21.2%; 95% CI, 8.8%-33.6%) and 10% or more weight loss (OR, 7.19; 95% CI, 2.55-25.9; average marginal effects, 17.4%; 95% CI, 8.7%-26.2%). Patients in the WNP group were referred at higher rates to WMTs, including bariatric surgery (18.9% vs 9.1%; P = .02), a low-calorie meal replacement program (16.7% vs 3.8%; P < .001), and a Mediterranean-style diet and activity program (10.6% vs 1.5%; P = .002). There were no between-group differences in antiobesity medication prescribing.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that WNP is feasible and associated with greater WMT use and weight loss than matched controls. The WNP warrants evaluation in a large-scale trial.
PMID:38771575 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12192
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412280. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12280.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: An increasing body of evidence suggests equivalent if not improved postpartum outcomes of in-person group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care. However, research is needed to evaluate outcomes of group multimodal prenatal care (GMPC), with groups delivered virtually in combination with individual in-person office appointments to collect vital signs and conduct other tests compared with individual multimodal prenatal care (IMPC) delivered through a combination of remotely delivered and in-person visits.
OBJECTIVE: To compare postpartum outcomes between GMPC and IMPC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A frequency-matched longitudinal cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health care delivery system. Participants included 424 individuals who were pregnant (212 GMPC and 212 frequency-matched IMPC controls (matched on gestational age, race and ethnicity, insurance status, and maternal age) receiving prenatal care between August 17, 2020, and April 1, 2021. Participants completed a baseline survey before 14 weeks’ gestation and a follow-up survey between 4 and 8 weeks post partum. Data analysis was performed from January 3, 2022, to March 4, 2024.
EXPOSURE: GMPC vs IMPC.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validated instruments were used to ascertain postpartum psychosocial outcomes (stress, depression, anxiety) and perceived quality of prenatal care. Self-reported outcomes included behavioral outcomes (breastfeeding initiation, use of long-acting reversible contraception), satisfaction with prenatal care, and preparation for self and baby care after delivery. Primary analyses included all study participants in the final cohort. Three secondary dose-stratified analyses included individuals who attended at least 1 visit, 5 visits, and 70% of visits. Log-binomial regression and linear regression analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: The final analytic cohort of 390 participants (95.6% follow-up rate of 408 singleton live births) was racially and ethnically diverse: 98 (25.1%) Asian/Pacific Islander, 88 (22.6%) Hispanic, 17 (4.4%) non-Hispanic Black, 161 (41.3%) non-Hispanic White, and 26 (6.7%) multiracial participants; median age was 32 (IQR, 30-35) years. In the primary analysis, after adjustment, GMPC was associated with a 21% decreased risk of perceived stress (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94) compared with IMPC. Findings were consistent in the dose-stratified analyses. There were no significant differences between GMPC and IMPC for other psychosocial outcomes. While in the primary analyses there was no significant group differences in perceived quality of prenatal care (mean difference [MD], 0.01; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.15) and feeling prepared to take care of baby at home (ARR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96-1.23), the dose-stratified analyses documented higher perceived quality of prenatal care (MD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.01-0.31) and preparation for taking care of baby at home (ARR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.43) for GMPC among those attending 70% of visits. No significant differences were noted in patient overall satisfaction with prenatal care and feeling prepared for taking care of themselves after delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, equivalent and, in some cases, better outcomes were observed for GMPC compared with IMPC. Health care systems implementing multimodal models of care may consider incorporating virtual group prenatal care as a prenatal care option for patients.
PMID:38771574 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12280
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 May 1;65(5):32. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.5.32.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate VEGF-C-induced lymphoproliferation in conjunction with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) antimetabolite treatment in a rabbit glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) model.
METHODS: Thirty-two rabbits underwent GFS and were assigned to four groups (n = 8 each) defined by subconjunctival drug treatment: (a) VEGF-C combined with 5-FU, (b) 5-FU, (c) VEGF-C, (d) and control. Bleb survival, bleb measurements, and IOP were evaluated over 30 days. At the end, histology and anterior segment OCT were performed on some eyes. mRNA was isolated from the remaining eyes for RT-PCR evaluation of vessel-specific markers (lymphatics, podoplanin and LYVE-1; and blood vessels, CD31).
RESULTS: Qualitatively and quantitatively, VEGF-C combined with 5-FU resulted in blebs which were posteriorly longer and wider than the other conditions: vs. 5-FU (P = 0.043 for longer, P = 0.046 for wider), vs. VEGF-C (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and vs. control (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). After 30 days, the VEGF-C combined with 5-FU condition resulted in longer bleb survival compared with 5-FU (P = 0.025), VEGF-C (P < 0.001), and control (P < 0.001). Only the VEGF-C combined with 5-FU condition showed a negative correlation between IOP and time that was statistically significant (r = -0.533; P = 0.034). Anterior segment OCT and histology demonstrated larger blebs for the VEGF-C combined with 5-FU condition. Only conditions including VEGF-C led to increased expression of lymphatic markers (LYVE-1, P < 0.001-0.008 and podoplanin, P = 0.002-0.011). Expression of CD31 was not different between the groups (P = 0.978).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding VEGF-C lymphoproliferation to standard antimetabolite treatment improved rabbit GFS success and may suggest a future strategy to improve human GFSs.
PMID:38771570 | DOI:10.1167/iovs.65.5.32
Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2024 May 21:1-9. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2024.2353185. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is a common metabolic bone disorder manifested by low bone mineral density and increased fracture risks in postmenopausal women. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to play an important role in bone formation. In this study, we investigated the potential association between the VEGF insertion/deletion (I/D) variant (rs35569394) and PMOP in a cohort of postmenopausal Turkish women.
METHODS: This study included 300 women, including 150 PMOP patients and 150 healthy postmenopausal women. A T score was used in the diagnosis of OP. DNA was extracted from all subjects. The VEGF I/D polymorphism was analyzed by the PCR method. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test and odds ratio (OR) were analyzed, considering CI 95% and p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients aged between 40 and 74 was 60.32 ± 8.65. The frequency of the I/I, I/D, and D/D genotypes was 7.34% versus 6.66%; 67.33% versus 65.34%; and 25.33% versus 28%, in patients and the control group, respectively. The allele frequencies were I: 41% (patients) and 39.4% (controls); D: 59% (patients) and 60.66% (controls). There was no statistically significant difference in the VEGF – 2549 I/D allele and genotype distribution between patients with PMOP and control subjects (p = 0.349, p = 0.864, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the VEGF I/D variant was not a significant factor in the development of PMOP in a Turkish population sample. These findings need confirmation in other ethnic populations.
PMID:38771564 | DOI:10.1080/15257770.2024.2353185
Qual Life Res. 2024 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03675-3. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Clinical benefits result from electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems that enable remote symptom monitoring. Although clinically useful, real-time alert notifications for severe or worsening symptoms can overburden nurses. Thus, we aimed to algorithmically identify likely non-urgent alerts that could be suppressed.
METHODS: We evaluated alerts from the PRO-TECT trial (Alliance AFT-39) in which oncology practices implemented remote symptom monitoring. Patients completed weekly at-home ePRO symptom surveys, and nurses received real-time alert notifications for severe or worsening symptoms. During parts of the trial, patients and nurses each indicated whether alerts were urgent or could wait until the next visit. We developed an algorithm for suppressing alerts based on patient assessment of urgency and model-based predictions of nurse assessment of urgency.
RESULTS: 593 patients participated (median age = 64 years, 61% female, 80% white, 10% reported never using computers/tablets/smartphones). Patients completed 91% of expected weekly surveys. 34% of surveys generated an alert, and 59% of alerts prompted immediate nurse actions. Patients considered 10% of alerts urgent. Of the remaining cases, nurses considered alerts urgent more often when patients reported any worsening symptom compared to the prior week (33% of alerts with versus 26% without any worsening symptom, p = 0.009). The algorithm identified 38% of alerts as likely non-urgent that could be suppressed with acceptable discrimination (sensitivity = 80%, 95% CI [76%, 84%]; specificity = 52%, 95% CI [49%, 55%]).
CONCLUSION: An algorithm can identify remote symptom monitoring alerts likely to be considered non-urgent by nurses, and may assist in fostering nurse acceptance and implementation feasibility of ePRO systems.
PMID:38771558 | DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03675-3