Nevin Manimala

Risk Anal. 2023 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/risa.14210. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

As acute gastrointestinal (AGI) disease patients only sometimes seek medical care or submit stool samples for testing, and laboratories cannot detect or identify the pathogen, most cases of foodborne gastroenteritis still need to be identified through public health monitoring. We conducted a population survey and sentinel hospital surveillance to determine the burden of foodborne gastroenteritis caused by non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica (NTS) and Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection, from July 2018 to June 2019 in Zhejiang province, China, and a model for calculating disease burden established. Using the burden of illness pyramid model, we estimated that there were 140.3 cases of NTS infection and 136.2 cases of V. parahaemolyticus infection. We estimated annual incidence per 100,000 population in Zhejiang province as 236 (95% confidence interval [CI] 208-267) and 206 (95% CI 155-232) cases for foodborne NTS and V. parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis, respectively. The results show that AGI caused by these two pathogens constitutes a substantial burden in the Zhejiang population. The health burden of AGI estimations caused by NTS and V. parahaemolyticus in this study can serve as a strategic framework to direct policy and intervention.

PMID:37648395 | DOI:10.1111/risa.14210

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e072700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072700.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity during pregnancy is effective in preventing diseases and promoting the health outcomes of mothers and babies. However, the level of physical activity among them is not ideal. Especially in China, the proportion of pregnant women who meet the recommendation of physical activity in the guidelines is even lower. Thus, we aim to evaluate the prevalence of meeting physical activity recommendation and its influencing factors during pregnancy in China.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (Weipu) and WanFang Data will be comprehensively searched by two reviewers. Studies that report the prevalence of Chinese pregnant women meeting physical activity recommendation will be included. Two reviewers will independently assess eligibility, extract data and evaluate methodological quality. Data including authors, publication years, language, geographical region, tools, trimesters, prevalence and influence factors will be extracted. Data will be analysed by Stata V.11 statistical software.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal ethics approval is required for this protocol and no primary data are to be collected. Findings from this review may be useful to develop interventions for the physical activity of pregnant women in China. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and public events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022372722.

PMID:37648391 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072700

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e071705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071705.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Total elbow replacement (TER) has higher failure rates requiring revision surgery compared with the replacement of other joints. Understanding the factors associated with failure is essential for informed decision-making between patients and clinicians, and for reducing the failure rate. This review aims to identify, describe and appraise the literature examining prognostic factors for failure of TER.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will be conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Electronic literature searches will be conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane. The search strategy will be broad, including a combination of subject headings (MESH) and free text search. This search will be supplemented with a screening of reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen all search results in two stages (title and abstract, and full text) based on the Population, Index prognostic factor, Comparator prognostic factor, Outcome, Time and Setting criteria. The types of evidence included will be randomised trials, non-randomised trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, registry studies and case-control studies. If the literature lacks enough studies, then case series with 50 or more TERs will be considered for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment for included studies will be performed by two independent reviewers using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies for Prognostic Factors and Quality In Prognostic Studies tools.Meta-analyses of prognostic estimates for each factor will be undertaken for studies that are deemed to be sufficiently robust and comparable. Several challenges are likely to arise due to heterogeneity between studies, therefore, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to account for the differences between studies. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Q and I² statistics. If I²>40% then pooled estimates will not be reported. When quantitative synthesis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. The quality of the evidence for each prognostic factor will be assessed using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023384756.

PMID:37648384 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071705

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e063586. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063586.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the global DISCOVERing Treatment Reality of Type 2 Diabetes in Real World Settings (DISCOVER) Study was to provide a comprehensive real world assessment of the treatment pattern changes for patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this analysis was to assess the metabolic control and the annual incidence of hypoglycaemia, hospitalisation and complications among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line therapy.

DESIGN: This study is part of the observational, longitudinal, prospective multinational DISCOVER Study.

SETTING: Governmental and private health sectors from different regions within Saudi Arabia.

PARTICIPANTS: The study recruited 519 patients with type 2 diabetes aged ≥18 years who were switching to second-line therapy. Patients who were already using insulin/injectable agents, patients with type 1 diabetes, pregnant women, and patients undergoing dialysis or with a history of renal transplantation were excluded.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Metabolic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; fear of hypoglycaemia; quality of life; and the incidence of complications, hypoglycaemic events and/or hospitalisations. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS: A total of 519 patients were recruited with a mean age of 52.4±11 years. Of these participants, 54.7% were male and 45.3% were female. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was 56.72/1000 patient-years. The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II showed a significant increase in patient worry related to hypoglycaemia from 6.4±11.9 at baseline to (p=0.0446) at the 36-month follow-up. The incidence of hospitalisation was 30.81/1000 patient-years. There was a moderate improvement in glycaemic control, represented as an HbA1c reduction from 8.8% at baseline to 8.2% at the 36-month follow-up. The incidence of macroangiopathy was 24.51/1000 patient-years and the incidence of microvascular complications such as retinopathy and albuminuria was 47.00/1000 patient-years and 221.71/1000 patient-years, respectively. The mean score of fear of hypoglycaemia showed an increase with 13.0±21.5 at baseline to 16.1±22.2 at the 36-month follow-up. When assessing the patients’ quality of life, there was an improvement in the mental component score from 47.4±9.1 at baseline to 53.0±6.7 at the 36-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment intensification decisions should be made individually, weighing the benefit of good glycaemic control against the risk of hypoglycaemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02322762 and NCT02226822.

PMID:37648382 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063586

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e072546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072546.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Individuals under-recruited in diabetes research studies include those not seen at endocrinology centres and those from rural, low socioeconomic and/or under-represented racial/ethnic groups. The purpose of this descriptive analysis is to detail recruitment and retention efforts of Project ECHO Diabetes clinical sites affiliated with Stanford University and University of Florida.

DESIGN: Prospective collection of participant engagement and qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators of research engagement within Project ECHO Diabetes, a virtual tele-education programme for healthcare providers in the management of individuals with insulin-requiring diabetes.

SETTING: Data were collected at the patient level, provider level and clinic level between 1 May 2021 and 31 July 2022.

PARTICIPANTS: Participants and study personnel were recruited from 33 Project ECHO Diabetes sites in California and Florida.

OUTCOMES: We report study completion rates for participants recruited into 33 Project ECHO Diabetes sites. Using barrier analysis, a methodology designed for the real-time assessment of interventions and system processes to identify barriers and facilitators, study personnel identified significant barriers to recruitment and retention and mapped them to actionable solutions.

RESULTS: In total, 872 participants (California n=495, Florida n=377) were recruited with differing recruitment rates by site (California=52.7%, Florida=21.5%). Barrier analysis identified lack of trust, unreliable contact information, communication issues and institutional review board (IRB) requirements as key recruitment barriers. Culturally congruent staff, community health centre (CHC) support, adequate funding and consent process flexibility were solutions to address recruitment challenges. Barriers to retention were inconsistent postal access, haemoglobin A1c kit collection challenges, COVID-19 pandemic and broadband/connectivity issues. Additional funding supporting research staff and analogue communication methods were identified as solutions address barriers to retention.

CONCLUSIONS: Funded partnerships with CHCs, trusted by their local communities, were key in our recruitment and retention strategies. IRB consent process flexibility reduced barriers to recruitment. Recruiting historically under-represented populations is feasible with funding aimed to address structural barriers to research participation.

PMID:37648378 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072546

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug 28;16(16):1990-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.030.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are routinely performed before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to assess aortic root anatomy and screen for coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the efficacy of CTA as a screening tool for significant proximal CAD before TAVR.

METHODS: With proper ethical oversight, patients undergoing TAVR at Cleveland Clinic with a preprocedural CTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and no prior percutaneous intervention, were identified from 2015 to 2021. Blinded to ICA results, the authors reviewed the left main, proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex coronary artery, and proximal right coronary artery by CTA coronary reconstruction to assess for nonsignificant stenosis (0% to 49%), moderate stenosis (50% to 69%), and severe stenosis (≥70%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen Kappa statistic were analyzed.

RESULTS: 2,217 patients (53.4% male, age 79.2 ± 8.5 years) met inclusion criteria. CTA evaluation revealed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 74%, and NPV of 97% for detecting ≥50% stenosis. Using a ≥70% stenosis cutoff, evaluation revealed a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 97%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 99%. Assessment of bypass graft patency revealed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 97%, PPV of 84%, and NPV of 98%. Cohen Kappa analysis indicated substantial to near perfect agreement between pre-TAVR CTA and ICA.

CONCLUSIONS: Pre-TAVR CTA has a high NPV for high-grade proximal stenosis of each coronary artery. As a result, CTA can be used as a screening tool to rule out significant proximal CAD in patients undergoing TAVR.

PMID:37648347 | DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.030

Anticancer Res. 2023 Sep;43(9):3881-3889. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16575.

ABSTRACT

Otorhinolaryngology tradition is that tonsillectomy (TE) is conducted among children and adolescents for obstructive sleep apnea secondary to adenotonsillar hypertrophy and in adults for chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids (recurrent tonsillitis). Nevertheless, over the last 50 years, we have observed a decline in TE worldwide. As a result, there is an emerging concern of a correlated possible increased risk of tonsil cancer (TC) and other subtypes of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Since the available data on such topics are limited and controversial, our aim was to elucidate the impact of TE on the incidence mainly of TC through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of the studies. After a thorough search, 7 retrospective studies were considered eligible for review and meta-analysis (MA). At MA, patients with a history of TE seem to show a reduced risk of TC but a higher predisposition for base of tongue (BOT) cancer (p<0.001): however, the elevated heterogeneity of the studies hampers drawing firm and convincing conclusions (statistical inconsistency >95%). In future, randomized control trials will be welcome to elucidate the prophylactic role of TE against TC and its real impact on BOT cancer.

PMID:37648322 | DOI:10.21873/anticanres.16575

Anticancer Res. 2023 Sep;43(9):4031-4036. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16591.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative [ER(-)] invasive breast cancers (IBCs) are known to be more aggressive than their ER(+) counterparts. This is less well defined for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study investigated the outcomes following the treatment of ER(-) DCIS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 ER(-) DCIS patients diagnosed between 2004-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Median follow-up was 63.9 months. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, T-test, logistic regression. The outcomes were compared to a group of 102 ER(+) DCIS patients from our institution.

RESULTS: Any breast event (BE) occurred in 10 (9.7%) patients at a median of 3.2 (1.7-7.2) years. The incidence of ipsilateral breast events (IBEs) was 5.8% (6/103). All IBE cases were ER(-) DCIS. All (n=4) contralateral breast events (CBEs) were ER(+) including 3 IBCs. Cumulative incidence of any BEs at 1, 2, and 5 years was 0%, 1.1%, and 9.1%, respectively. Among patients with ER(-) DCIS who developed BE, breast conserving surgery (BCS) had been performed for the initial DCIS in 90% of cases. In those without any BE, the BCS rate (vs. mastectomy) was 58.1% (p=0.08). Adjuvant radiotherapy after BCS was used less often among patients with vs. without subsequent BE (55.5% vs. 77.4%) (p=0.22). Predictors for BE occurrence were not identified. The incidence of any BE among patients with ER(+) DCIS was 6.9% and was not significantly different compared to ER(-) DCIS group (p=0.46).

CONCLUSION: ER(-) DCIS outcomes were similar to our institutional ER-positive DCIS group and the previously reported ones for predominantly ER-positive DCIS cohorts.

PMID:37648296 | DOI:10.21873/anticanres.16591

BMJ. 2023 Aug 30;382:e072348. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DESIGN: Umbrella review.

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS: 101 meta-analyses were included (observational=50, RCTs=51) (AMSTAR 2 high 33, moderate 31, low 32, or critically low 5). From RCTs supported by high to moderate certainty, cannabis based medicines increased adverse events related to the central nervous system (equivalent odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 3.73)), psychological effects (3.07 (1.79 to 5.26)), and vision (3.00 (1.79 to 5.03)) in people with mixed conditions (GRADE=high), improved nausea/vomit, pain, spasticity, but increased psychiatric, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence among others (GRADE=moderate). Cannabidiol improved 50% reduction of seizures (0.59 (0.38 to 0.92)) and seizure events (0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)) (GRADE=high), but increased pneumonia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For chronic pain, cannabis based medicines or cannabinoids reduced pain by 30% (0.59 (0.37 to 0.93), GRADE=high), across different conditions (n=7), but increased psychological distress. For epilepsy, cannabidiol increased risk of diarrhoea (2.25 (1.33 to 3.81)), had no effect on sleep disruption (GRADE=high), reduced seizures across different populations and measures (n=7), improved global impression (n=2), quality of life, and increased risk of somnolence (GRADE=moderate). In the general population, cannabis worsened positive psychotic symptoms (5.21 (3.36 to 8.01)) and total psychiatric symptoms (7.49 (5.31 to 10.42)) (GRADE=high), negative psychotic symptoms, and cognition (n=11) (GRADE=moderate). In healthy people, cannabinoids improved pain threshold (0.74 (0.59 to 0.91)), unpleasantness (0.60 (0.41 to 0.88)) (GRADE=high). For inflammatory bowel disease, cannabinoids improved quality of life (0.34 (0.22 to 0.53) (GRADE=high). For multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids improved spasticity, pain, but increased risk of dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For cancer, cannabinoids improved sleep disruption, but had gastrointestinal adverse events (n=2) (GRADE=moderate). Cannabis based medicines, cannabis, and cannabinoids resulted in poor tolerability across various conditions (GRADE=moderate). Evidence was convincing from observational studies (main and sensitivity analyses) in pregnant women, small for gestational age (1.61 (1.41 to 1.83)), low birth weight (1.43 (1.27 to 1.62)); in drivers, car crash (1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)); and in the general population, psychosis (1.71 (1.47 to 2.00)). Harmful effects were noted for additional neonatal outcomes, outcomes related to car crash, outcomes in the general population including psychotic symptoms, suicide attempt, depression, and mania, and impaired cognition in healthy cannabis users (all suggestive to highly suggestive).

CONCLUSIONS: Convincing or converging evidence supports avoidance of cannabis during adolescence and early adulthood, in people prone to or with mental health disorders, in pregnancy and before and while driving. Cannabidiol is effective in people with epilepsy. Cannabis based medicines are effective in people with multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, inflammatory bowel disease, and in palliative medicine but not without adverse events.

STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018093045.

FUNDING: None.

PMID:37648266 | DOI:10.1136/bmj-2022-072348

J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Aug;11(8):e007118. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007118.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in the USA for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and in the European Union for patients ≥26 years with R/R B-ALL. After 2 years of follow-up in ZUMA-3, the overall complete remission (CR) rate (CR+CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi)) was 73%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.4 months in 78 Phase 1 and 2 patients with R/R B-ALL who received the pivotal dose of brexu-cel. Outcomes by prior therapies and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) are reported.

METHODS: Eligible adults had R/R B-ALL and received one infusion of brexu-cel (1×10⁶ CAR T cells/kg) following conditioning chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the CR/CRi rate per central review. Post hoc subgroup analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics provided.

RESULTS: Phase 1 and 2 patients (N=78) were included with median follow-up of 29.7 months (range, 20.7-58.3). High CR/CRi rates were observed across all prior therapy subgroups examined: 1 prior line of therapy (87%, n=15) and ≥2 prior lines (70%, n=63); prior blinatumomab (63%, n=38) and no prior blinatumomab (83%, n=40); prior inotuzumab (59%, n=17) and no prior inotuzumab (77%, n=61); and prior alloSCT (76%, n=29) and no prior alloSCT (71%, n=49). The frequency of Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome, neurological events, and treatment-related Grade 5 adverse events were largely similar among prior therapy subgroups.Median duration of remission (DOR) in responders with (n=14) and without (n=43) subsequent alloSCT was 44.2 (95% CI, 8.1 to not estimable (NE)) and 18.6 months (95% CI, 9.4 to NE); median OS was 47.0 months (95% CI, 10.2 to NE) and not reached (95% CI, 23.2 to NE), respectively. Median DOR and OS were not reached in responders without prior or subsequent alloSCT (n=22).

CONCLUSIONS: In ZUMA-3, adults with R/R B-ALL benefited from brexu-cel, regardless of prior therapies and subsequent alloSCT status, though survival appeared better in patients without certain prior therapies and in earlier lines of therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the impact prior therapies and subsequent alloSCT have on outcomes of patients who receive brexu-cel.

PMID:37648261 | DOI:10.1136/jitc-2023-007118