Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Understanding the relationship between type-2 diabetes, MRI markers of neurodegeneration and small vessel disease, and dementia risk: a mediation analysis

Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01080-7. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

To explore to which extent neurodegeneration and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) could mediate the association between type-2 diabetes and higher dementia risk. The analytical sample consisted in 2228 participants, out of the Three-City study, aged 65 and older, free of dementia at baseline who underwent brain MRI. Diabetes was defined by medication intake or fasting or non-fasting elevated glucose levels. Dementia status was assessed every 2 to 3 years, during up to 12 years of follow-up. Brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and white matter hyperintensities volume (WMHV) were selected as markers of neurodegeneration and cerebral SVD respectively. We performed a mediation analysis of the effect of baseline BPF and WMHV (mediators) on the association between diabetes and dementia risk using linear and Cox models adjusted for age, sex, education level, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, BMI, smoking and alcohol drinking status, APOE-ε4 status, and study site. At baseline, 8.8% of the participants had diabetes. Diabetes (yes vs. no) was associated with higher WMHV (βdiab = 0.193, 95% CI 0.040; 0.346) and lower BPF (βdiab = -0.342, 95% CI -0.474; -0.210), as well as with an increased risk of dementia over 12 years of follow-up (HRdiab = 1.65, 95% CI 1.04; 2.60). The association between diabetes status and dementia risk was statistically mediated by higher WMHV (HRdiab=1.05, 95% CI 1.01; 1.11, mediated part = 10.8%) and lower BPF (HRdiab = 1.12, 95% CI 1.05; 1.20, mediated part = 22.9%). This study showed that both neurodegeneration and cerebral SVD statistically explained almost 30% of the association between diabetes and dementia.

PMID:38190014 | DOI:10.1007/s10654-023-01080-7

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Interaction of Biomechanical, Anthropometric, and Demographic Factors Associated with Patellofemoral Pain in Rearfoot Strike Runners: A Classification and Regression Tree Approach

Sports Med Open. 2024 Jan 8;10(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00671-8.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is among the most common injuries in runners. While multiple risk factors for patellofemoral pain have been investigated, the interactions of variables contributing to this condition have not been explored. This study aimed to classify runners with patellofemoral pain using a combination of factors including biomechanical, anthropometric, and demographic factors through a Classification and Regression Tree analysis.

RESULTS: Thirty-eight runners with PFP and 38 healthy controls (CON) were selected with mean (standard deviation) age 33 (16) years old and body mass index 22.3 (2.6) kg/m2. Each ran at self-selected speed, but no between-group difference was identified (PFP = 2.54 (0.2) m/s x CON = 2.55 (0.1) m/s, P = .660). Runners with patellofemoral pain had different patterns of interactions involving braking ground reaction force impulse, contact time, vertical average loading rate, and age. The classification and regression tree model classified 84.2% of runners with patellofemoral pain, and 78.9% of healthy controls. The prevalence ratios ranged from 0.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.23) to 9.86 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-83.34). The strongest model identified runners with patellofemoral pain as having higher braking ground reaction force impulse, lower contact times, higher vertical average loading rate, and older age. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated high accuracy at 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.93; standard error: 0.04; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: The classification and regression tree model identified an influence of multiple factors associated with patellofemoral pain in runners. Future studies may clarify whether addressing modifiable biomechanical factors may address this form of injury.

PMID:38190013 | DOI:10.1186/s40798-023-00671-8

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Erector spinae plane block for radiofrequency ablation of hepatic focal lesions: Randomized controlled trial

J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):533-541. doi: 10.5055/jom.0838.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the opioid sparing and pain relief effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic focal lesions under conscious sedation.

DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Tanta University Hospitals.

PATIENTS: Fifty patients aged 30-60 years old and eligible for RFA of hepatic focal lesions were included.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomized to receive either local anesthetic infiltration (group I) or ESPB (group II). Both groups received sedation by propofol infusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was total fentanyl consumption. Secondary outcomes were nonverbal pain score (NVPS), time to first analgesic request post-procedure, radiologist’s satisfaction, and complications.

RESULTS: In group I, NVPS was significantly increased at 10, 15, 25, and 30 minutes during RFA compared to group II (p = 0.008, <0.001, 0.018, and 0.001, respectively) with no significant differences on arrival to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and after 1 hour. Total fentanyl consumption during the procedure was significantly increased in group I compared to group II (160.9 ± 38.2 and 76 ± 21 µg, respectively; p < 0.001) with prolonged time to first analgesia request post-procedure in group II compared to group I (392.7 ± 38.8 and 101.1 ± 13.6 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). The level of radiologist’s satisfaction was significantly increased in the group II (p = 0.010). Three patients in group I and one patient in group II needed general anesthesia. Lower incidence of complications in group II occurred with statistical insignificance.

CONCLUSIONS: The ESPB provided adequate analgesia and reduced opioids consumption during the hepatic RFA, with high radiologist’s satisfaction.

PMID:38189195 | DOI:10.5055/jom.0838

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Patterns of opioid use among Texas dental practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic

J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):523-532. doi: 10.5055/jom.0837.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to assess factors that influence opioid prescribing by dentists and the role of these factors in the practice of dental pain control.

DESIGN: A 25-question survey instrument was distributed to the study population for anonymous responses, covering dentist and practice demographics and opioid prescribing characteristics.

SETTING: Private solo and group practice settings, including general practitioners and dental specialists.

PARTICIPANTS: Potential participants included all active members of a large state dental professional association.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: They were practitioner and practice demographic traits, types of opioids prescribed, and statistical correlations. Outcome variables included practice type, practitioner gender, practice location, practice model, and years in practice. Categorical covariates were summarized statistically by frequencies and percentages, and continuous covariates were summarized by means, medians, ranges, and standard deviations.

RESULTS: Strongest correlations with opioid prescribing included general practitioner (vs specialist) and male gender. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was confirmed as having exerted a significant impact on opioid prescribing among the survey respondents.

CONCLUSIONS: Further research is warranted to assess post-pandemic opioid prescribing patterns, and additional educational strategies regarding limitations of opioid prescriptions should be applied to general, rather than specialty, dental practitioners.

PMID:38189194 | DOI:10.5055/jom.0837

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Provider attitudes and current practice regarding the prescription of opioid-containing pain medication for vaginal delivery

J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):515-521. doi: 10.5055/jom.0836.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The epidemic of opioid misuse and abuse is rampant in the United States. A large percentage of patients who go on to misuse or abuse opioids were initially legally prescribed an opioid medication by their physician. One of the most common reasons patients of reproductive age seek medical care is for pregnancy and delivery. These patients are frequently prescribed opioids. Greater than one in 10 Medicaid-enrolled women fill an opioid prescription after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the opioid prescribing patterns of obstetric providers following vaginal deliveries.

STUDY DESIGN: Obstetric physicians and certified nurse midwives (CNMs) from different practice backgrounds were administered a questionnaire regarding opioid prescribing practices for patients who undergo vaginal delivery. Providers were contacted via email and completed survey via REDCap.

RESULTS: Ninety-nine providers completed the survey between October 2018 and January 2019. Eight percent of all providers reported prescribing opioids at discharge after vaginal deliveries. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of physicians who provided opioid prescriptions at discharge compared to CNMs (16.7 percent vs 1.8 percent, respectively, p < .05). Common reasons for prescribing opioids at discharge included post-partum tubal ligation (56.4 percent), third- and fourth-degree lacerations (59.6 and 73.4 percent, respectively), and operative deliveries (26.6 percent). Physicians were significantly more likely to prescribe an opioid after a second-degree laceration than CNMs (19.1 percent vs 5.3 percent, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns for opioid prescription vary by provider type as well as by delivery characteristics. Further study is necessary to delineate the optimal care while minimizing unnecessary opioid prescriptions.

PMID:38189193 | DOI:10.5055/jom.0836

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Opioid use disorder and motivational interviewing: Training physician assistants for the epidemic

J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):507-513. doi: 10.5055/jom.0835.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum on physician assistant (PA) students’ knowledge about opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and management and (2) present student satisfaction with the curriculum.

METHODS: Three cohorts of PA students completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires about their knowledge of motivational interviewing (MI) for OUD. One cohort of students completed the 11-item questionnaire without exposure to the intervention (control group). Students’ satisfaction with the curriculum was assessed as was their pre- and post-intervention knowledge about using MI for OUD. Bivariate statistical tests were used to analyze the quantitative data.

RESULTS: Three hundred complete and usable responses were obtained from the four cohorts of PA students (n = 300, 87.7 percent response rate). The intervention groups answered a higher number of items correctly (median = 7) than the control group (median = 6, Wilcoxon sign test M = 31, p < 0.0001). Among the intervention group, there was not a statistically significant between cohort difference on: (1) the number of identical pre- and post-intervention questionnaire items answered correctly (Chi-square = 3.77, DF = 2, p = 0.15), and (2) the total number of items answered correctly on the post-intervention questionnaire (Chi-square = 0.32, DF = 2, p = 0.85). Student comments suggest students were supportive of the curriculum, with improvements noted on how to deliver the material.

CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention using MI for PA students was found to be valuable, and students who completed the intervention had greater knowledge about using MI with OUD patients than those who did not complete the training. The size of the effect was small, and more research on the curriculum is necessary prior to widespread adoption.

PMID:38189192 | DOI:10.5055/jom.0835

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Opioid prescription patterns in a children’s hospital from 2012 to 2016

J Opioid Manag. 2023 Nov-Dec;19(6):489-494. doi: 10.5055/jom.0833.

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Pain management is a widely discussed topic, especially in the setting of the current opioid epidemic. Previous studies have shown that the use of opioids increased in the adult population. We aimed to look at the use of narcotic and non-narcotic pain medications at a large pediatric hospital to discern if patterns of pediatric pain management changed over time.

METHODS: 58,402 analgesic prescriptions of patients 0-21 years of age were analyzed from May 2012 to November 2016. A logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of age, sex, primary diagnosis, and the length of hospital stay with probability of opioid prescription.

RESULTS: 36,560 patients aged 0-21 years (mean: 10.5, median: 11.0, and standard deviation (SD): 7.42) received analgesic pain medications. 21,847 (59.8 percent) patients were prescribed more than one analgesic. There was a male predominance in patients <15 years of age; however, in adolescents >16 years, females constituted 57.1 percent of patients. Data also showed a statistically significant reduction of opioid prescriptions from 2012 to 2016 (p < 0.001). Age and length of hospital stay were directly associated with opioid prescription (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Data show that there is a decrease in overall opioid prescriptions among pediatric patients, which may be secondary to new Food and Drug Administration regulations and increased awareness of morbidity associated with opioid use. Not surprisingly, increased hospital stay and increase in age lead to more analgesic prescriptions. Further investigation is needed to determine the differences within opioid prescription patterns.

PMID:38189190 | DOI:10.5055/jom.0833

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Chest in Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Study for Assessment of Added Diagnostic Value

J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/jum.16395. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric chest abnormalities by comparing interpretation of CEUS studies and confidence level to conventional US studies.

METHODS: CEUS studies in patients with a variety of clinically suspected chest abnormalities performed between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed and compared to same-day conventional US studies. Examinations were independently interpreted by 4 radiologists blinded to clinical and other imaging data. Rater confidence was classified as low, moderate, or high. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing image interpretation to patient outcome as the ground truth. Interobserver agreement was also assessed.

RESULTS: Sixteen patients (10 male) with 18 CEUS studies were included. Median rater agreement with ground truth was significantly higher for CEUS (100%) than conventional US (50%; P = .004). Median rater confidence was high (3.0) for CEUS, and low-moderate (1.5) for conventional US (P < .001). CEUS sensitivity (54.6-81.8%) and specificity (63.4-100.0%) were greater than conventional US (45.5-72.7% and 12.5-63.5%, respectively). CEUS false positives (0-4) and false negatives (2-5) were fewer than conventional US (4-7 and 3-6, respectively). Except for one rater pair where agreement was substantial (κ = .78, P < .01), inter-rater agreement for CEUS for all other rater pairs was nonsignificant (κ = .25-0.51, P ≥ .07). Agreement for conventional US was moderate and statistically significant for 3 rater pairs (κ = .55-0.78) and nonsignificant for the remaining 3 rater pairs (P ≥ .06).

CONCLUSIONS: CEUS adds diagnostic value to the assessment of a variety of chest abnormalities. The data support further evaluation of the role of CEUS as a non-invasive, problem-solving technique in children.

PMID:38189176 | DOI:10.1002/jum.16395

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Successful multidisciplinary team management of placenta accreta spectrum disorder: A referral center model in a middle-income country

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15339. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder managed by a multidisciplinary care team (MCT) compared with a conventional care team (CCT) in a PAS referral center in Thailand.

METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study analyzed PAS management outcomes in the PSU PAS Center between January 2010 and December 2022. The incidence of hemorrhage ≥3500 mL and the composite maternal and neonatal outcomes of PAS were compared before and after the introduction of an MCT in 2016.

RESULTS: Of 227 PAS cases, 219 (96.5%) had pathological confirmation. There were 52 (22.9%) cases of placenta accreta, 119 (52.4%) cases of placenta increta, and 56 (24.7%) cases of placenta percreta. The incidence of estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥3500 mL decreased from 61.8% to 34.3% (P < 0.001) after the establishment of the MCT. The median EBL decreased from 4000 (IQR: 2600,7250) mL to 2250 (1300, 4750) mL (P < 0.001). EBL reduction was statistically significant in the accreta and increta groups (P < 0.001). Red blood cell transfusions decreased from five (3, 9) to two (1, 6) units (P < 0.001) per patient. The length of maternal hospital stays and ICU admissions were statistically shorter when PAS was managed by an MCT (P < 0.001). The length of newborn hospital and ICU stays decreased significantly (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The incidence of massive postpartum hemorrhage and a composite of maternal and neonatal morbidities in pregnant women with PAS disorder improved significantly after the establishment of an MCT to manage PAS in a middle-income country setting.

PMID:38189162 | DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15339

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Frontline nurses’ experiences of managing visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Danish university hospital – Lessons learned

Scand J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 8. doi: 10.1111/scs.13232. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Worldwide visitor restrictions forced nurses to separate patients from their relatives. However, the experience of implementing shifting restrictions from the frontline nurses’ perspectives in a Danish context has yet to be assessed.

AIM: The aim of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore frontline nurses’ experiences of managing shifting visitor restrictions in a Danish somatic university hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS: An online questionnaire, including open-ended questions, was developed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

FINDINGS: 116 nurses from 29 departments participated; they were informed about restrictions primarily by their charge nurses and hospital intranet. Shifting visitor restrictions compelled the nurses to constantly adjust and negotiate their practices. When deciding to suggest deviating from the restrictions, they shared their decision-making with colleagues. Visitor restrictions left the hospital environment quieter, but they also created a lack of overview and predictability, an emotional burden, and a negative impact on the quality of care.

CONCLUSION: Restricting relatives’ access challenged the nurses’ professional values, and it seems to have affirmed their appreciation of relatives’ role as important partners in contemporary hospital-based health care.

PMID:38189138 | DOI:10.1111/scs.13232