Nevin Manimala

Cureus. 2022 Aug 8;14(8):e27764. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27764. eCollection 2022 Aug.

ABSTRACT

Introduction In endourology, ureteric stenting is a common procedure, and stent placement is not without adverse health consequences. A ureteric stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ) was devised to objectively evaluate the symptoms related to it. The original questionnaire is in English and translated into various languages worldwide. We translated the questionnaire into Urdu and validated it in an Urdu-speaking population with a stent in situ. Materials and methods The English version of USSQ was translated and back-translated by experts in both languages. Content validity was checked by sending Urdu version to five experts, and their scores were used to calculate the content validity index. The final version was filled by patients with stents on three different occasions, two with stents in situ at one and two weeks post stent placement, and a third time two weeks after stent removal. Discriminant validity was checked by filling of USSQ by 64 healthy individuals. Statistical analysis was done with mean and standard deviation, Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman’s coefficient, and paired sample t-test. Results A total of 64 patients filled the complete questionnaire at all times with mean age of 35.31 ± 8.853. All subdomains of USSQ have significant drop in scores with stent in situ in comparison to post stent removal. Reliability was checked by Cronbach’s alpha in all subdomains (71.5-91.1) and test-retest reliability by Spearman’s coefficient (80.5-94.7). Symptoms change in stent in situ with post stent removal checked with paired sample t-test with a p-value of <0.005 in all domains, except body pain. Discriminant validity was checked with healthy controls, and a p-value of <0.005 was found in all subdomains of USSQ, except pain. Conclusion The Urdu version of the USSQ is a reliable and valid instrument that can be used in clinical practice and future research in an Urdu-speaking population.

PMID:36106281 | PMC:PMC9449251 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.27764

Cureus. 2022 Aug 8;14(8):e27787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27787. eCollection 2022 Aug.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the short-term benefits and results of autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injection in osteochondral defects in the knee of young adults. The effectiveness of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections has been evaluated in osteoarthritis. However, few studies investigated its efficacy in knee osteochondral defects.

METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A matched cohort of 30 patients in each group was studied. Group 1 received three HA injections at weekly intervals, and group 2 received three ACP injections at two weekly intervals. We measured Kujala, Lysholm, Oxford, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at baseline, six, 12, and 36 months to assess function and pain.

RESULTS: Most lesions were in the medial femoral condyles in both groups, followed by lateral femoral condyle and patellofemoral regions. In group 1 (HA), the mean pre-injection scores for Kujala, Lysholm, and Oxford improved significantly at six and 12 months. The scores decreased at 36 months, however, they remained significantly better than the baselines (P < 0.05). The pre-injection VAS scores continued to improve significantly from 6.06±0.785 to 3.40±0.912 at 36 weeks. In group 2 (ACP), VAS and the outcome scores showed a consistent and statistically significant improvement from pre-injection to 36 months. Conclusions: Our study confirms the short-term clinical benefits of using ACP for symptomatic osteochondral defects of the knee. Further high-quality comparative studies with longer follow-ups are needed to ascertain whether ACP is beneficial in the long term.

PMID:36106279 | PMC:PMC9449309 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.27787

Cureus. 2022 Aug 8;14(8):e27796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27796. eCollection 2022 Aug.

ABSTRACT

Male hypogonadism is a condition in which the body does not produce enough testosterone, resulting in symptoms such as depressed mood, decreased sex drive, decreased skeletal muscle, and increased fat mass. Male hypogonadism can be readily treated with many available treatments when clinically indicated. The advent of readily available testosterone therapy has increased the importance of finding the most efficacious and cost-efficient treatment modality to approach these patients. Testosterone is typically administered through intramuscular or subcutaneous injections, topical gels, and oral tablets. The efficacy of testosterone therapy on hypogonadal men has been widely studied. However, there has been little research done comparing each modality against each other. This paper seeks to compare the various modalities of testosterone replacement therapy using various parameters such as the beneficial effects on bone mineral density, skeletal muscle mass, fat mass, and libido while simultaneously weighing the distinct undesirable side effects of each form of administration. Our investigation analyzes the methodology and results of the existing research within this field. It aims to draw a nuanced conclusion about the current standard of care for testosterone replacement therapy. According to our research and statistical analyses, we have concluded that oral administration has shown to be as advantageous as other modalities for male hypogonadism. Currently, injectables are the modality of choice, but with the right improvements, oral administration can potentially overtake injectables and transdermal testosterone as the treatment of choice.

PMID:36106278 | PMC:PMC9452423 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.27796

Cureus. 2022 Aug 10;14(8):e27843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27843. eCollection 2022 Aug.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly prescribed medications for pain management with high risks associated with chronic use. The inherent risk associated with opioids is worsened by variable prescribing practices used by prescribers. In the midst of the “opioid epidemic,” perceptions of opioid prescription among healthcare practitioners have not been widely investigated.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the opinions, experiences, and habits of prescribers as well as other healthcare personnel involved in the administration of opioids at an academic medical center.

METHODS: Questions were shared through an online survey format, answerable in Likert scale scores from 1 to 5, and categorized into three domains; prescribing habits/management, education, and risk stratification.

RESULTS: A total of 638 survey responses were collected comprising 130 physicians (21%), 44 residents and fellows (6.9%), 53 physician assistants and nurse practitioners (8.31%), 18 pharmacists (2.82%), 85 medical students (13.32%), and 308 nurses (48.28%). Collected responses revealed a weak consensus on prescribing practices and a lack of evidence-based opioid management such as low utilization of multidisciplinary clinics and unfamiliarity with the WHO analgesic ladder across all specialties. The survey also indicated a lack of education regarding the prescribing of opioids across all specialties although pharmacists reported obtaining the most. Lastly, the use of risk stratification tools such as prescription drug monitoring programs and urine drug testing were underutilized amongst practitioners.

CONCLUSION: Strengthening practitioners’ opioid management abilities with evidence-based interventions for each aforementioned domain may aid in the fight against the opioid epidemic.

PMID:36106268 | PMC:PMC9460958 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.27843

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, preferences for information to include in infographics, and barriers to reading full-text articles.

METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of consumers of infographics that summarise health or medical research. Demographic and outcome data were collected and summarised using descriptive statistics. A sensitivity analysis explored whether being a researcher/academic influenced the findings.

RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four participants completed the survey (88% completion rate). Participants included health professionals (66%), researchers (34%), academics (24%), and patients/the public (13%). Most used Twitter (67%) and smartphones (89%) to access and view infographics, and thought infographics were useful tools to communicate research (92%) and increase the attention research receives (95%). Although most participants were somewhat/extremely likely (76%) to read the full-text article after viewing an infographic, some used infographics as a substitute for the full text at least half of the time (41%), thought infographics should be detailed enough so they do not have to read the full text (55%), and viewed infographics as tools to reduce the time burden of reading the full text (64%). Researchers/academics were less likely to report behaviours/beliefs suggesting infographics can reduce the need to read the full-text article.

CONCLUSIONS: Given many people use infographics as a substitute for reading the full-text article and want infographics to be detailed enough so they don’t have to read the full text, a checklist to facilitate clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed infographics summarising some types of health and medical research may be useful.

PMID:36104815 | DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6

BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;22(1):1746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14144-2.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Farmworkers are at risk of heat-related illness (HRI). We sought to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of farmworker Spanish/English participatory heat education and a supervisor decision-support mobile application (HEAT intervention) on physiological heat strain; and 2) describe factors associated with HRI symptoms reporting.

METHODS: We conducted a parallel, comparison group intervention study from May-September of 2019 in Central/Eastern Washington State, USA. We used convenience sampling to recruit adult outdoor farmworkers and allocated participating crews to intervention (n = 37 participants) and alternative-training comparison (n = 38 participants) groups. We measured heat strain monthly using heart rate and estimated core body temperature to compute the maximum work-shift physiological strain index (PSI_max) and assessed self-reported HRI symptoms using a weekly survey. Multivariable linear mixed effects models were used to assess associations of the HEAT intervention with PSI_max, and bivariate mixed models were used to describe factors associated with HRI symptoms reported (0, 1, 2+ symptoms), with random effects for workers.

RESULTS: We observed larger decreases in PSI_max in the intervention versus comparison group for higher work exertion levels (categorized as low, low/medium-low, and high effort), after adjustment for maximum work-shift ambient Heat Index (HI_max), but this was not statistically significant (interaction – 0.91 for high versus low/medium-low effort, t = – 1.60, p = 0.11). We observed a higher PSI_max with high versus low/medium-low effort (main effect 1.96, t = 3.81, p < 0.001) and a lower PSI_max with older age (- 0.03, t = – 2.95, p = 0.004), after covariate adjustment. There was no clear relationship between PSI_max and the number of HRI symptoms reported. Reporting more symptoms was associated with older age, higher HI_max, 10+ years agricultural work, not being an H-2A guest worker, and walking > 3 min to get to the toilet at work.

CONCLUSIONS: Effort level should be addressed in heat management plans, for example through work/rest cycles, rotation, and pacing, in addition to education and other factors that influence heat stress. Both symptoms and indicators of physiological heat strain should be monitored, if possible, during periods of high heat stress to increase the sensitivity of early HRI detection and prevention. Structural barriers to HRI prevention must also be addressed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT04234802 , date first posted 21/01/2020.

PMID:36104813 | DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14144-2

Mol Med. 2022 Sep 14;28(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s10020-022-00542-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HNF1A-MODY is a monogenic form of diabetes caused by variants in the HNF1A gene. Different HNF1A variants are associated with differences in age of disease onset, but other factors are postulated to influence this trait. Here, we searched for genetic variants influencing age of HNF1A-MODY onset.

METHODS: Blood samples from 843 HNF1A-MODY patients from Czech Republic, France, Poland, Slovakia, the UK and the US were collected. A validation set consisted of 121 patients from the US. We conducted a genome-wide association study in 843 HNF1A-MODY patients. Samples were genotyped using Illumina Human Core arrays. The core analysis was performed using the GENESIS package in R statistical software. Kinship coefficients were estimated with the KING and PC-Relate algorithms. In the linear mixed model, we accounted for year of birth, sex, and location of the HNF1A causative variant.

RESULTS: A suggestive association with age of disease onset was observed for rs2305198 (p = 2.09E-07) and rs7079157 (p = 3.96E-06) in the HK1 gene, rs2637248 in the LRMDA gene (p = 2.44E-05), and intergenic variant rs2825115 (p = 2.04E-05). Variant rs2637248 reached nominal significance (p = 0.019), while rs7079157 (p = 0.058) and rs2825115 (p = 0.068) showed suggestive association with age at diabetes onset in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS: rs2637248 in the LRMDA gene is associated with age at diabetes onset in HNF1A-MODY patients.

PMID:36104811 | DOI:10.1186/s10020-022-00542-0

Clin Hypertens. 2022 Sep 15;28(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40885-022-00209-2.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) is associated with high-salt consumption especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Although the pressor effect of salt is viewed as a chronic effect, some studies suggest that a salty meal may increase BP immediately in some individuals, and that this effect may cause endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, the aim of our research was to study the immediate pressor response to oral salt (IPROS) and its determinants, with the expectation that a simple methodology may be devised to diagnose it in the clinic or in low-resource environments.

METHODS: We conducted a time series trial at Livingstone Central Hospital. We present data in 127 normotensive participants who ingested 2 g of sodium chloride; their BP was monitored for 120 minutes in intervals of 10 minutes. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analyses of data.

RESULTS: Median age was 30 years (interquartile range, 22-46 years) and 52% were female patients. An increase of ≥10 mmHg in mean arterial pressure (MAP), considered a clinically significant IPROS, was present in 62% of participants. Systolic BP 30 minutes after the salt load was a significant predictor of IPROS, avoiding the need to calculate MAP in the clinic setting.

CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the presence of an IPROS in a high proportion (62%) of otherwise normotensive participants. The average time course for this response was 30 minutes and its duration was sustained for the 120-minutes period of study in most of the participants. Prediction of IPROS by ∆SBP (change in systolic blood pressure) at 30 minutes allows for easy assessment of possible responder status in the clinic. Our data indicate that the IPROS to oral salt-loads in the range currently consumed by the Western world and African populations in single meals may increase the 24-hour BP load, which is a risk factor for hypertension and target organ damage. The relevance of our findings indicates the need to include dietary sodium assessment in the diagnosis, prevention, and management of high BP.

PMID:36104796 | DOI:10.1186/s40885-022-00209-2

Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Sep 14;11(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00280-1.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although surgery is the curative option of choice for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, morbidity, especially the rate of pulmonary complications, and consequently mortality of patients undergoing abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy remain unacceptably high. Causes for developing post-esophagectomy pulmonary complications are trauma to the lung and thoracic cavity as well as systemic inflammatory response. Statins are known to influence inflammatory pathways, but whether perioperative statin medication impacts on inflammatory response and pulmonary complication development after esophagectomy had not been investigated, yet.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis and propensity score matching of patients, who either received perioperative statin medication [statin( +)] or not [statin( -)], with regard to respiratory impairment (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 300 mmHg), pneumonia development, and inflammatory serum markers after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy.

RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients who underwent abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy for cancer were included into propensity score pair-matched analysis [statin( +): n = 26 and statin( -): n = 52]. Although no differences were seen in postoperative inflammatory serum markers, C-reactive protein values correlated significantly with the development of pneumonia beyond postoperative day 3 in statin( -) patients. This effect was attenuated under statin medication. No difference was seen in cumulative incidences of respiratory impairment; however, significantly higher rate (65.4% versus 38.5%, p = 0.0317, OR 3.022, 95% CI 1.165-7.892) and higher cumulative incidence (p = 0.0468) of postoperative pneumonia were seen in statin( +) patients, resulting in slightly longer postoperative stay on intensive care unit (p = 0.0612) as well as significantly prolonged postoperative in-hospital stay (p = 0.0185).

CONCLUSIONS: Development of pulmonary complications after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy is multifactorial but frequent. The establishment of preventive measures into the perioperative clinical routine is mandatory for an improved patient outcome. Perioperative medication with statins might influence pneumonia development in the highly vulnerable lung after abdomino-thoracic esophagectomy. Perioperative interruption of statin medication might be beneficial in appropriate patients; however, further clinical trials and translational studies are needed to prove this hypothesis.

PMID:36104793 | DOI:10.1186/s13741-022-00280-1

Trials. 2022 Sep 14;23(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06518-z.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) displaying some typical histological features. These include diffuse alveolar damage with extensive pulmonary coagulation activation. This results in fibrin deposition in the microvasculature, leading to the formation of hyaline membranes in the air sacs. Well-conducted clinical trials have found that nebulised heparin limits pulmonary fibrin deposition, attenuates progression of ARDS, hastens recovery and is safe in non-COVID ARDS. Unfractionated heparin also inactivates the SARS-CoV-2 virus and prevents entry into mammalian cells. Nebulisation of heparin may therefore limit fibrin-mediated lung injury and inhibit pulmonary infection by SARS-CoV-2. Based on these findings, we designed the CHARTER-Ireland Study, a phase 1b/2a randomised controlled study of nebulised heparin in patients requiring advanced respiratory support for COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS: This is a multi-centre, phase 1b/IIa, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study. The study will randomise 40 SARs-CoV-2-positive patients receiving advanced respiratory support in a critical care area. Randomisation will be via 1:1 allocation to usual care plus nebulised unfractionated heparin 6 hourly to day 10 while receiving advanced respiratory support or usual care only. The study aims to evaluate whether unfractionated heparin will decrease the procoagulant response associated with ARDS up to day 10. The study will also assess safety and tolerability of nebulised heparin as defined by number of severe adverse events; oxygen index and respiratory oxygenation index of intubated and unintubated, respectively; ventilatory ratio; and plasma concentration of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL6, IL-8, IL-10 and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, fibrinogen and lactate dehydrogenase as well as the ratios of IL-1β/IL-10 and IL-6/IL-10. These parameters will be assessed on days 1, 3, 5 and 10; time to separation from advanced respiratory support, time to discharge from the intensive care unit and number tracheostomised to day 28; and survival to days 28 and 60 and to hospital discharge, censored at day 60. Some clinical outcome data from our study will be included in the international meta-trials, CHARTER and INHALE-HEP.

DISCUSSION: This trial aims to provide evidence of potential therapeutic benefit while establishing safety of nebulised heparin in the management of ARDS associated with SARs-CoV-2 infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04511923 . Registered on 13 August 2020. Protocol version 8, 22/12/2021 Protocol identifier: NUIG-2020-003 EudraCT registration number: 2020-003349-12 9 October 2020.

PMID:36104785 | DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06518-z