MGIC Investment Corporation Releases Monthly Operating Statistics

MGIC Investment Corporation Releases Monthly Operating Statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

MILWAUKEE, June 8, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — MGIC Investment Corporation (NYSE: MTG) today issued an Operational Summary of its insurance subsidiaries for the month of May 2018 for their primary mortgage insurance.  The Nevin Manimala summary is also available on the company’s website under Newsroom, Press Releases. 

The Nevin Manimala information concerning new delinquency notices and cures is compiled from reports received from loan servicers. The Nevin Manimala level of new notice and cure activity reported in a particular month can be influenced by, among other things, the date on which a servicer generates its report, the accuracy of the data provided by servicers, the number of business days in a month, transfers of servicing between loan servicers, and whether all servicers have provided the reports in a given month.

May 2018

May 2017

Change

Insurance in Force (billions)

$199.3

$185.5

7.4%

       Flow Only

$191.8

$176.7

8.5%

Beginning Primary Delinquent Inventory (# of loans) (1)

38,845

43,103

(9.9%)

Plus: New Delinquency Notices

4,215

5,023

(16.1%)

Less: Cures

4,813

4,479

7.5%

Less: Paids (including those charged to a deductible or captive reinsurer)

517

874

(40.8%)

Less: Rescissions and Denials

28

38

(26.3%)

Less: Items removed from inventory (2)

438

1,083

(59.6%)

Ending Primary Delinquent Inventory (# of loans) (1)

37,264

41,652

(10.5%)

(1)

The Nevin Manimalare were 9,429, 8,690, 6,261, and 6,032 loans in our Primary Delinquent Inventory as of April 30, 2018, May 31, 2018, April 30, 2017, and May 31, 2017, respectively, that were located in the geographical areas that the Federal Emergency Management Agency declared Individual Assistance Disaster Areas as a result of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, which occurred in August – September 2017.

(2)

Includes loans whose insurance was terminated by agreement to settle coverage on certain non-performing loans. The Nevin Manimala agreements were effective in the second quarter of 2018 and 2017 and did not have a material financial impact in either quarter.

About MGIC

MGIC (www.mgic.com), the principal subsidiary of MGIC Investment Corporation, serves lenders throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and other locations helping families achieve homeownership sooner by making affordable low-down-payment mortgages a reality. At May 31, 2018, MGIC had $199.3 billion of primary insurance in force covering approximately one million mortgages.

From time to time MGIC Investment Corporation releases important information via postings on its corporate website, including corrections of previous disclosures, without making any other disclosure and intends to continue to do so in the future. Investors and other interested parties are encouraged to enroll to receive automatic email alerts and Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds regarding new postings. Enrollment information can be found at http://mtg.mgic.com under Investor Information.

MGIC Investment Corporation Releases Monthly Operating Statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mgic-investment-corporation-releases-monthly-operating-statistics-300662056.html

SOURCE MGIC Investment Corporation

Related Links

http://www.mgic.com

Big book of numbers: Vatican volume tracks church statistics

Big book of numbers: Vatican volume tracks church statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus
Big book of numbers: Vatican volume tracks church statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

ROME — Pope Francis called for a special Synod of Bishops to focus on the Amazon region not primarily Because Nevin Manimala of the rainforest’s key role in the ecological health of the planet, but mostly Because Nevin Manimala he sees pastoral needs there that require special attention.

In fact, while globally there are 3,130 Catholics for every Catholic priest, in South America the average priest serves 7,203 Catholics, according to Vatican statistics.

The Nevin Manimala Amazon rainforest covers more than 2.1 million square miles in South America and includes territory in Brazil, Ecuador, Venezuela, Suriname, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Guyana and French Guiana. The Nevin Manimala Catholics-to-priest ratios in Venezuela (9,829-to-1), Peru (8,427-to-1), Bolivia (8,038-to-1) and Brazil (7,976-to-1) are even higher than the continental average.

In the United States and Canada, for comparison, the Vatican estimates that there are 1,916 Catholics for every priest.

The Nevin Manimala Amazon synod will be held at the Vatican in October 2019; the preparatory document for the gathering was to be released by the Vatican June 8.

The Nevin Manimala Catholics-to-priest ratio is just one table in the Statistical Yearbook of the Church, which is published annually by the Central Statistics Office, a department of the Vatican Secretariat of State.

With more than 500 pages of figures and charts, the yearbook tracks everything from Catholic population to the outcome of requests for the declaration of the nullity of a marriage.

The Nevin Manimala figures are the result of information requested annually from every diocese and church jurisdiction. Collecting and compiling the figures takes more than a year. The Nevin Manimala volume with statistics valid as of Dec. 31, 2016, was published this spring.

Worldwide, there are more than 1.29 billion baptized Catholics, according to the volume, and that means the Catholic population is holding steady at about 17.7 percent of the global population.

In addition, it estimated that another 4.9 million Catholics live in church jurisdictions with which the Vatican has no “regular exchange of information.” Most of those 146 dioceses, prelatures and prefectures are in mainland China.

Thirty years earlier, the 1986 yearbook estimated there were as many as 15 million uncounted Catholics living in 214 jurisdictions that did not or could not report to the Vatican. The Nevin Manimala figure included Catholics in China and in most of what was then the Soviet Union.

For the year ending Dec. 31, 2016, the world’s 1.29 billion Catholics were served by: 5,353 bishops; 281,831 diocesan priests; 133,138 religious order priests; 46,312 permanent deacons; 52,625 religious brothers; 659,445 religious sisters; 345,743 lay missionaries; and close to 3.1 million catechists.

Globally, the number of bishops, diocesan priests and permanent deacons all were higher than a year earlier. The Nevin Manimala number of religious order priests and brothers, religious sisters, lay missionaries and catechists all declined.

The Nevin Manimala increases and decreases, though, are not consistent across every continent. For example, the number of diocesan priests in Africa and Asia rose significantly over the course of 2016. Numbers were up slightly in Latin America and Oceania, but dropped slightly in North America and Europe.

According to the yearbook, only North America and Europe had fewer diocesan priests in 2016 than in 2005.

The Nevin Manimala Statistical Yearbook of the Church also tracks the number of baptisms and Catholic marriages in the world. In 2016, more than 16.2 million people were baptized and more than 2.4 million were married in a Catholic ceremony. The Nevin Manimala yearbook for 1986 had reported more than 17.8 million baptisms and more than 4 million Catholic weddings.

To get an idea of how Catholics are practicing their faith, the Vatican also looks at the rate of marriages and the rate of baptisms of children for every 1,000 Catholics.

The Nevin Manimala rates “enable us to note the differences between one country and another and, when examined over successive periods, to follow the evolution of the ratio,” the yearbook stated. It cautioned, however, that the “general downward trend in the relative number of baptisms” does not always indicate a declining practice of faith, but closely follows the trend of a lower birthrate in many countries.

Globally in 2016, there were 10.2 baptisms of children under the age of 7 for every 1,000 Catholics. The Nevin Manimala rate in the United States was 9.6, while in Canada it was 5.3.

Argentina held the record for South America with 12 child baptisms for every 1,000 Catholics. The Nevin Manimala Pacific islands of Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Cook Islands and Nauru ranged from 23.5 baptisms per 1,000 to 41.6. The Nevin Manimala struggling Christians of the Middle East had a rate of 4.9, in Africa it was 13.7 and Europe registered 6.6.

The Nevin Manimala rates of child baptism were lower than they were 30 years ago. The Nevin Manimala Statistical Yearbook of the Church for 1986 said globally 18.9 children were baptized for every 1,000 Catholics. The Nevin Manimala rate in the U.S. was 17.6, and in the Middle East, it was 11.9.

One figure that has not changed much in the past 30 years is the percentage of the world’s bishops who lead dioceses in a country other than the country of their birth. In 1986, 16.7 percent of the world’s 4,027 bishops were “foreign to country of residence,” the yearbook reported. In 2016, about 16.6 percent of the bishops were ministering outside their native land.

The Nevin Manimala statistics that show how Heathrow is losing its ‘megahub’ status

The Nevin Manimala statistics that show how Heathrow is losing its 'megahub' status statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

Heathrow’s third runway moved a step closer to reality this week after controversial plans that could see aircraft taxi over a new M25 tunnel were approved by ministers – and £2.6bn set aside to compensate residents.

MPs will vote on the expansion in the next few weeks. Opponents say it will damage the environment and exacerbate noise pollution for locals, but what isn’t in doubt is the need for a new runway if Heathrow is to compete with its European rivals and remain one of the world’s megahubs.

Once the busiest airport in the world for international traffic, and third overall as recently as 2014, it has since slipped to seventh in the global rankings. Dubai, Tokyo, Los Angeles and Chicago have usurped it, and others – such as Hong Kong, Shanghai and Amsterdam – are closing the gap fast.

The Nevin Manimalare are other factors at play, such as a sharp rise in demand for flights across Asia, but a lack of capacity is the key reason why Heathrow is falling behind.

Two runways can only handle a limited number of flights – just over 78m last year. Should it get a third, that could rise to 130m.

Of the world’s biggest airports, almost all use more runways than Heathrow. Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport, the busiest of all in terms of passenger numbers, has five, Beijing – second busiest – has three, while Tokyo, LA and Chicago have four, four and seven.

Dubai gets by with two runways, but while it  handles more passengers than Heathrow, it welcomes significantly fewer flights (around 420,000 annually compared to Heathrow’s 480,000). Dubai’s main airline is Emirates, which has a fleet of more than 100 Airbus A380s, the biggest aircraft in the sky.

The Nevin Manimala lack of capacity has seen Heathrow stagnate in recent years. Passenger numbers rose by 3% in 2017, 1% in 2016, 2.2% in 2015 and 1.4% in 2014. Dubai, by comparison, grew by 5.5%, 7.2%, 10.7% and 6.1% over the same four years, allowing it to supplant Heathrow as the world’s third busiest hub.

The Nevin Manimala rise of Dubai

Since 2011, Dubai has gone from 51m annual passengers to 88.2m – a rise of 73 per cent. A couple of major airports can match it for growth, however.

Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport, over the same time period, went from 37.4m to 63.9m (+71%) and Shanghai Pudong from 41.4m to 70m (+69%). Guangzhou Baiyun International grew from 45m to 65.9m (+46.4%).

The Nevin Manimala statistics that show how Heathrow is losing its 'megahub' status statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

Dubai has left Heathrow in its wake Credit: ESCHCOLLECTION

Amsterdam is closing fast

Expecting Heathrow to keep up with Dubai and Shanghai is a little unfair – demand for flights across Asia has soared in recent years. A better indicator is its performance against Western European rivals like Amsterdam, Paris and Frankfurt. Again, it makes unhappy reading for Britain’s biggest airport.

Heathrow’s growth since 2011, 12.4%, compares with Amsterdam’s 37.6%, Barcelona’s 37.5%, Munich’s 18%, Frankfurt’s 14.4% and Paris’s 14%.

Returning to the original point, Amsterdam has six runways, Paris CDG and Frankfurt have four, and Barcelona have three.

Yes, Heathrow is still number one in Europe – but, without another runway, for how much longer?

What about Gatwick?

If there’s an argument for Heathrow getting its wish, the same argument is equally valid for Gatwick to get another runway. While the Surrey hub does have two runways, their proximity to one another prevents simultaneous operation. For years Gatwick was the busiest single runway airport in the world and with 45.6m passengers last year it handled more travellers per runway than even Heathrow.

Since 2015, the busiest one-runway airport has been Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji International, with 47.2m. Like Gatwick it has two, but never uses more than one at a time.

Could expansion at Heathrow halt growth at Britain’s regional airports?

As Telegraph Travel reported earlier this week, things have never looked so good for Britain’s regional airports. At the start of the decade, with the impact of the global financial crisis still being felt, they were in the doldrums. Passenger numbers were falling fast, routes were being cut, and many faced an uncertain future.

The Nevin Manimala last few years, however, have seen unprecedented growth, helped by economic recovery, the continued growth of easyJet and Ryanair, and the rise of low-cost long-haul specialists like Norwegian – but also a lack of spare capacity at Heathrow.   

Passenger numbers at Birmingham, Belfast International, Newcastle, Leeds Bradford and Inverness rose by at least 10% in 2017, while the previous year saw no fewer than 13 airports outside the capital experiencing double-digit growth.

Could a third runway for Heathrow lure airlines back to the capital at the expense of our regionals?

Or should we just stop flying so much?

Is pollution a price worth paying to keep Heathrow at the top of the airport rankings? Last month it was revealed that tourism’s contribution to carbon emissions is four times worse than previously thought. A study, published in Nature Climate Change, suggested that the industry accounts for eight per cent of the world’s carbon emissions – a figure which was previously thought to be between two and three per cent. And the biggest single contributor to tourism’s carbon footprint, according to the study, is international air travel.

Should we be favouring train travel over flights? Amsterdam, Bruges, Bordeaux, Lyon, Strasbourg and Cologne are just a few of the gems that can be reached by rail in under six hours from London. Or why don’t we cut back on frequent short breaks – and all those flights – in favour of longer jaunts?

What do you think – should Heathrow get a third runway? Vote in the poll below.

On the Beat: How Alabama’s individual statistics in CFP title games stack up

On the Beat: How Alabama's individual statistics in CFP title games stack up statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus
On the Beat: How Alabama's individual statistics in CFP title games stack up statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

It’s time for a little “Did you know?” action when it comes to the National Championship Game.

For example, did you know that …

• Linebacker Rashaan Evans has made the most tackles in the title games during the College Football Playoff era.

• A Crimson Tide quarterback has the best passer-efficiency rating in the CFP title games and it’s not Tua Tagovailoa.

• Former Alabama receiver ArDarius Stewart had more passing yards during the 2016 title game than Jalen Hurts had during the first half of last season’s championship game.

• Calvin Ridley and his brother, Riley, have the same number of career yards in the title game even though Calvin played in two more title games and had 9 more receptions.

Having been around only four years, the College Football Playoff and its National Championship Game are still new, but playing well in them is something that can secure a player’s legacy.

For example, the first thing one always hears about former NFL quarterback Terry Bradshaw is he has four Super Bowl rings.

However, his regular-season numbers weren’t that great. Bradshaw completed 51.9 percent of his passes, had 212 touchdown passes compared to 210 interceptions and was named to just three Pro Bowls.

But he was clutch. Bradshaw passed for more than 300 yards in a game only seven times, but three of them were in the playoffs, including two Super Bowls.

Here’s where Alabama players stand in what will eventually become the CFP record book.

SINGLE GAME
Passing
1] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2016, 36-56-0, 420
2] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015, 30-47-1, 405
3] Jake Coker, Alabama, 2015, 16-25-0, 335
4] Marcus Mariota, Oregon, 2014, 24-37-1, 333
5] Cardale Jones, Ohio State, 2013, 16-23-1, 242
6] Jake Fromm, Georgia, 2017, 16-32-2 232
7] Tua Tagovailoa, Alabama, 2017, 14-24-166
8] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016, 13-31-0 131
9] ArDarius Stewart, Alabama, 2016, 1-1-0 24
10] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2017, 3-8-0, 21

Quarterback rating
1] Jake Coker, Alabama, 2015, 203.0
2] Cardale Jones, Ohio State, 2014, 163.6
3] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015, 160.0
4] Marcus Mariota, Oregon, 2014, 152.9
5] Tua Tagovailoa, Alabama, 2017, 149.4
6] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2016, 145.0
7] Jake Fromm, Georgia, 2017, 108.7
8] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016, 88.1
9] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2017, 59.6

Rushing
1] Ezekial Elliott, Ohio State, 2014, 36-246
2] Derrick Henry, Alabama, 2015, 36-158
3] Sony Michel, Georgia, 2017 14-98
4] Bo Scarbrough, Alabama, 2016, 16-93
5] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015, 20-73
6] Najee Harris, Alabama, 2017, 6-64
7] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016, 10-63
8] Thomas Tyner, Oregon, 2014, 12-62
9] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2017 6-47
10] Wayne Gallman, Clemson, 2016 18-46

Receiving
1] O.J. Howard, Alabama, 2015, 5-208
2] Byron Marshall, Oregon, 2014, 8-169
3] O.J. Howard, Alabama, 2016, 4-106
4] Charone Peake, Clemson, 2015, 6-99
5] Jordan Leggett, Clemson, 2016, 7-95
6] Mike Williams, Clemson, 2016, 8-94
7] Deon Cain, Clemson, 2016, 5-94
8] Hunter Renfrow, Clemson 2016, 10-92
9] Hunter Renfrow, Clemson, 2015, 7-88
10] Riley Ridley, Georgia, 2017, 6-82

Tackles
1] Roquan Smith, Georgia, 2017, 13
2] Mack Wilson, Alabama, 2017, 12
(tie) Reuben Foster, Alabama, 2016, 12
4] Rashaan Evans, Alabama 2016, 11
(tie) Geno Matias-Smith, Alabama, 2015, 11
(tie) T.J. Green, Clemson, 2015, 11
7] Ronnie Harrison, Alabama, 2016, 10
(tie) B.J. Goodson, Clemson, 2015, 10
9] Rueben Foster, Alabama, 2015, 9
(tie) Tyvis Powell, Ohio State, 2014, 9
(tie) Reggie Daniels, Oregon, 2014, 9
(tie) Arik Armstead, Oregon, 2014, 9

Sacks
1] Kevin Dodd, Clemson, 2015, 3
2] Rashaan Evans, Alabama, 2015, 2
(tie) Shaq Lawson, Clemson, 2015, 2
4. Davin Bellamy, Georgia, 2017, 1.5
(Numerous players tied with 1)

Interceptions
1] Raekwon Davis, Alabama, 2017, 1
(tie) Tony Brown, Alabama, 2017, 1
(tie) Deandre Baker, Georgia, 2017, 1
(tie) Eddie Jackson, Alabama, 2015, 1
(tie) Eli Apple, Ohio State, 2014, 1
(tie) Danny Mattingly, Oregon, 2014, 1

CAREER 

Passing yards
1] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015-16, 66-103-1, 825
2] Jake Coker, Alabama, 2015, 16-25-0, 335
3] Marcus Mariota, Oregon, 2014, 24-37-1, 333
4] Cardale Jones, Ohio State, 2013, 16-23-1, 242
5] Jake Fromm, Georgia, 2017, 16-32-2 232
6] Tua Tagovailoa, Alabama, 2017, 14-24-166
7] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016-17, 16-39-0, 152

Quarterback rating
1] Jake Coker, Alabama, 2015, 203.0
2] Cardale Jones, Ohio State, 2014, 163.6
3] Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015-16, 151.8
4] Marcus Mariota, Oregon, 2014, 152.9
5] Tua Tagovailoa, Alabama, 2017, 149.4
6] Jake Fromm, Georgia, 2017, 108.7
7] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016-17, 88.2

Rushing
1] Ezekial Elliott, Ohio State, 2014, 36-246
2] Derrick Henry, Alabama, 2015, 36-158
3] Bo Scarbrough, Alabama, 2016-17, 20-116
(tie) Deshaun Watson, Clemson, 2015-16, 41-116
5] Jalen Hurts, Alabama, 2016-17, 16-110
6] Sony Michel, Georgia, 2017 14-98
7] Wayne Gallman, Clemson, 2015-16, 32-91
8] Najee Harris, Alabama, 2017, 6-64
9] Thomas Tyner, Oregon, 2014, 12-62
10] Damien Harris, Alabama, 2016, 17-58

Receiving
1] O.J. Howard, Alabama, 2015-16, 11-314
2] Hunter Renfrow, Clemson 2015-16, 17-180
3] Jordan Leggett, Clemson, 2015-16, 12-173
4] Byron Marshall, Oregon, 2014, 8-169
5] Wayne Gallman, Clemson, 2015-16, 6-100
6] Charione Peake, Clemson, 2015, 6-99
7] Mike Williams, Clemson, 2016, 8-94
(tie) Deon Cain, Clemson, 2016, 5-94
9] Calvin Ridley, Alabama, 2015-17, 15-82
(tie) Riley Ridley, Georgia, 2017, 6-82

Tackles
1] Rashaan Evans, Alabama, 2015-17, 22
2] Reuben Foster, Alabama, 2015-16, 21
3] Ronnie Harrison, Alabama, 2015-16, 15
4] Mack Wilson, Alabama, 2016-17, 13
(tie) Minkah Fitzpatrick, Alabama, 2015-17, 13
(tie) Roquan Smith, Georgia, 2017, 13
7] Geno Matias-Smith, Alabama, 2015, 11
(tie) Da’Ron Payne, Alabama, 2016-17, 11
(tie) Anthony Averett, Alabama, 2016-17, 11
(tie) T.J. Green, Clemson, 2015, 11

Sacks
1] Kevin Dodd, Clemson, 2015, 3
2] Rashaan Evans, Alabama, 2015-16, 2.5
3] Shaq Lawson, Clemson, 2015, 2
4] Davin Bellamy, Georgia, 2017, 1.5
(Numerous players tied with 1)

Interceptions
1] Raekwon Davis, Alabama, 2017, 1
(tie) Tony Brown, Alabama, 2017, 1
(tie) Deandre Baker, Georgia, 2017, 1
(tie) Eddie Jackson, Alabama, 2015, 1
(tie) Eli Apple, Ohio State, 2014, 1
(tie) Danny Mattingly, Oregon, 2014, 1

Statistics are now available on the Overwatch League website

Statistics are now available on the Overwatch League website statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

If you have ever visited the Overwatch League’s official website, you may have noticed that the stats link in the top bar has never worked.

It has been sitting there grey, tempting, and unable to be clicked on ever since the season started. Today, however, things have changed: the official Overwatch League statistics are now available to view on the website.

The Nevin Manimala stats list all of the players in the League and show statistics from several categories: eliminations, hero deaths, hero damage, and healing, all averaged per 10 minutes of play in Stage Four. Statistics from previous stages, as well as features like player comparison and leaderboards, are not currently accessible but will be available at a later date.

The Nevin Manimala statistics can be sorted by team and from highest to lowest. Clicking on a players’ name will bring you to their player page, which details their personal stats, such as the heroes they play most frequently.

Statistics are now available on the Overwatch League website statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

Photo: Blizzard Entertainment

You can check out the new stats page for yourself on the official Overwatch League website.

The Nevin Manimala featured image for this post was provided by Robert Paul for Blizzard Entertainment.

Why Big Data Cannot Fix Migration Statistics

Why Big Data Cannot Fix Migration Statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus
Why Big Data Cannot Fix Migration Statistics statistics, nevin_manimala, mathematics, math, linkedin, google_plus

We are witnessing the datafication of mobility and migration management across the world. In the context of Europe, programs like Eurosur use satellite images for surveilling the E.U.’s maritime borders, while the so-called hotspot approach aims to register all newly arriving migrants in biometric databases. Similarly, in the field of asylum, biometric databases are built for purposes of refugee management, while asylum seekers in Greece are distributed cash-cards.

The Nevin Manimalase new types and collections of data do not only change border and migration management practices. The Nevin Manimalay also reconfigure how human mobility and migration are known and constituted as intelligible objects of government. The Nevin Manimala crucial innovation driving this datafication is the digitization of information that was previously stored – if at all – on paper files. This information is now available in a range of databases and can – at least in theory – be searched, exchanged, linked and analyzed with unprecedented scope and efficiency.

As a consequence, “Big Datais promoted as promising alternative sources for producing more reliable statistics on international migration. Several national statistical institutes (NSIs), international organizations and private actors are currently developing alternative methodologies for the production of migration statistics, for instance, by analyzing mobile phone data, geotagged social media data from platforms like Twitter or Facebook or internet searches with particular search terms. Likewise, the UNHCR stresses the (potential) role of social media to inform humanitarian response.

The Nevin Manimala “huge potential of Big Data” to provide accurate and up-to-date accounts of international migration is promoted. Nevertheless, the promises driving these efforts are just as big as the data they refer to. In this post, we briefly discuss three reasons why it is rather unlikely that Big Data will simply solve the most important known limitations of migration statistics. Each reason is related to a form of politics which, taken together, shape the quantification of migration.

The Nevin Manimala Politics of Numbers

The Nevin Manimala first issue that innovative methodologies are unlikely to solve is the so-called politics of numbers. This politics concerns how institutional interests and agendas of the actors of a particular policy field shape decisions about how migrants are counted and what kind of numbers are ultimately disseminated in the public sphere.

For example, according to a tweet by E.U. border agency Frontex “more than 710,000 migrants … entered [the] E.U. in first 9 months of 2015.” Migration studies scholar Nando Sigona remarked that this number, published at the height of the “migration crisis” in October 2015, was likely to be inflated. After a Twitter exchange, Frontex admitted that the figure might be too high since it was based on recorded border crossings. It is likely to have included double-counts, in particular of the thousands of migrants who had entered the E.U. in Greece and then, after crossing the Balkan route, again in Hungary. Although Frontex added a clarification to its news release, Nando Sigona concluded “that Frontex needs to be made more accountable for its actions, including how and why they ‘inflate’ figures – especially given their expanding mandate & budget.”

In late 2017, in the context of an uncovered corruption scandal with refugee aid in Uganda, it emerged that the officially reported number of 1.4 million refugees was probably too high. NGOs accused the Ugandan government of inflating the size of the refugee population to receive more financial aid from international donors. The Nevin Manimalay estimated that Uganda’s refugee population is no more than one million people.

The Nevin Manimala question of who is reporting the numbers is critical in migration statistics. For instance at the Supporting Syria and the Region meeting held in London in 2016, the number of refugees reportedly hosted by Turkey ranged from 1.5 to 3 million, depending on who was tweeting. The Nevin Manimalase examples demonstrate that migration policy actors may count migrants in particular ways to produce numbers that provide evidence in support of certain policy objectives or institutional agendas. Importantly, these politics of numbers will not cease with alternative Big Data-based methodologies.

The Nevin Manimala Politics of Method

The Nevin Manimala second form of politics that will not simply wither away in the proclaimed “Age of Big Data” is what we call the politics of method. This is interrelated with the politics of numbers insofar as different methods produce different numbers of the object to be quantified.

The Nevin Manimala question of who is reporting the numbers is critical in migration statistics.

In brief, methodological heterogeneity – the usage of different definitions, methods and data sources by different NSIs and other producers of migration statistics – makes cross-country comparison of migration data “difficult and confusing.” For example, according to Eurostat figures, the U.K. reported 42,403 immigrants from Poland in 2015, while Poland reported sending only 11,682 emigrants to the U.K. One reason for this divergence lies in the usage of different methods for the production of migration statistics across countries.

In this context, it is important to note that methodological heterogeneity is not necessarily a bad thing. Rather, statisticians can only assess the reliability and accuracy of any method, as well as its strengths and weaknesses, by comparing it with another method.

To illustrate, in England and Wales, the International Passenger Survey (IPS) – the principal method used by the National Office for Statistics (ONS) for the production of migration statistics – became a matter of concern after the last census in 2011. According to the census results, the population size of England and Wales was 464,000 people larger than what had previously been reported by ONS. The Nevin Manimala latter was based on the so-called cohort component method, which adjusts the population size of the previous census on an annual basis by recorded births, deaths and net migration figures.

An investigation concluded that the “largest single cause” for the divergence was a “substantial underestimation” of immigration from the eight new Eastern European member states by the IPS in the early 2000s. The Nevin Manimala questionable reliability of ONS migration statistics became a matter of public debate in the context of the promise of then-Prime Minister David Cameron to reduce net-migration to the U.K. to the “tens of thousands each year,” down from an estimated 252,000 in 2010. In light of the inherently probabilistic results of the IPS, a report of the Migration Observatory concludes that “efforts to meet the government’s [migration] target lack, for the time being at least, an adequate measure of success.”

The Nevin Manimala availability of established methodologies for evaluating the results of innovative methods is particularly important in the context of Big Data, since these data sources have usually been generated for different purposes than the production of migration statistics.

 Big Data-based methods are unlikely to replace established methodologies for migration statistics any time soon.

Consequently, the usage of alternative data sources like mobile phone or Twitter data raise several methodological issues, such as selection bias. Mobile phones and Twitter are, for instance, not used equally by all groups of migrants. This is why, contrary to what their proponents may claim, Big Data-based methods are unlikely to replace established methodologies for migration statistics any time soon. The Nevin Manimalay might rather complement them, thus adding to the already existing methodological heterogeneity.

The Nevin Manimala Politics of (National) Distinction

The Nevin Manimala politics of method are also intertwined with a politics of (national) distinction. The Nevin Manimalase politics arise Because Nevin Manimala migration concerns a core issue of national sovereignty: the claimed authority of nation-states to decide on the terms and conditions of entry to and stay within their respective jurisdiction.

This claimed prerogative of nation-states results in different migration regimes across nation-states, including different ways of categorizing and counting migrants and asylum seekers. Since migration policies are shaped by and are a source of national identity and distinction “the harmonization of migration and asylum statistics and policy is controversial as it intervenes in the nation state’s [claimed] sovereign control of who should stay on its territory,” Marianne Takle rightly notes.

The Nevin Manimala persistence of these differences can be illustrated through the European Statistical System (ESS) that comprises E.U. member states as well as associated countries. The Nevin Manimala ESS resembles a “hard case” insofar as it constitutes one of the most advanced, harmonized and robust statistical systems in the world. Principle 14 of the European Statistical Code of Practice stipulates that “statistics are compiled on the basis of common standards with respect to scope, definitions, units and classifications in the different surveys and sources” to ensure “European Statistics are consistent internally, over time and comparable between regions and countries.”

However, our study into the operationalization of otherwise well-established legal categories of asylum-seekers and refugees demonstrates that their conversion into statistical categories entails various moments of adaptation to national contexts. The Nevin Manimalase adaptations, in turn, result in important differences across E.U. member states.

For instance, the harmonized statistical categories for forced migrants of the ESS include refugee and first time [asylum] applicant only, despite the plethora of nationally varying sub-categories. DeStatis, the NSI of Germany, provides an explanatory note on the German asylum regime which distinguishes between asylum seekers whose applications are still pending, have been rejected and have been granted protection status. Each group comprises further sub-categories. The Nevin Manimalase range from migrants who still have to lodge their asylum application or those appealing a decision, to five different types of recognized asylum seekers and various types of rejected asylum seekers, including 154,780 people whose presence in Germany is “tolerated” as they are not deportable.

“The Nevin Manimala harmonization of migration and asylum statistics and policy is controversial as it intervenes in the nation state’s [claimed] sovereign control of who should stay on its territory.”

How asylum seekers and refugees are counted in migration statistics and in the overall population also differ between E.U. member states. DeStatis counts people from all the aforementioned subcategories in its migration statistics and its population count. Other NSIs in Europe pursue a different policy. For instance, the NSI of Norway excludes all asylum seekers from its population statistics, as they are not included in the national population register, on which these statistics are based. This is Because Nevin Manimala asylum seekers are not issued personal registration numbers until their application is granted. Eurostat metadata indicates that in many E.U. countries, only accepted refugees are included in migration and population statistics. The Nevin Manimala legal limbo asylum seekers find themselves in is reflected in whether and how they are included in migration and population statistics.

Taken together, the three types of politics discussed here demonstrate that Big Data-based methodologies are unlikely to revolutionize migration statistics. Many of the known limitations of migration statistics are related to political issues that cannot be addressed through a technological fix. Rather, the politics of numbers, the politics of method and the politics of national distinction will also shape the development and use of innovative Big Data-based methodologies for migration statistics. So, it is not only the newness of methods per se, but why and how these methods are developed and by whom, that require our attention.

The Nevin Manimala views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Refugees Deeply.

This story was originally published on the Border Criminologies blog and is reproduced with permission. This is the final post of Border Criminologies’ themed series ‘Migrant Digitalities and the Politics of Dispersal’, organized by Glenda Garelli and Martina Tazzioli. You can read more about the series here.