Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Sep 9:1-19. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1979103. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Overhead throwing by cricketers when fielding with different approaches has been described using two-dimensional analysis. Currently, the three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic characteristics of an overhead throw performed by cricketers following a run-up is unknown. Fifteen South African cricketers performed six overhead throws, from a stationary position and with a run-up over 15-20 m prior to fielding a ball, respectively. Kinematic data and ground reaction forces were collected throughout the throwing trials. Joint kinetics were calculated using inverse dynamics. An independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine joint kinetic differences between throwing approaches. Differences between the kinematic waveforms for stationary and run-up throwing approaches were assessed using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping ANOVA (P<0.05). The shoulder, elbow and thoraco-lumbar joints displayed similar kinematics between throwing approaches. The run-up approach displayed increased hip flexion between 0-34% and 57-100% (F(1, 28) = 6.726;P=0.01) of the throwing cycle; and lumbo-pelvic flexion between 57-65% (F(1, 28) = 6.823;P=0.02) of the throwing cycle; greater shoulder compression (F(1, 28) = 1.036;P=0.02) and posterior force (F(1, 28) = 1.052;P=0.009) at maximum external rotation; yet less superior shoulder force (F(1, 28) = 1.744;P=0.005) and elbow compression (F(1, 28) = 4.331;P=0.03), superior (F(1, 28) = 1.212;P=0.002) and medial (F(1, 28) = 1.370;P=0.03) elbow forces at ball release, when compared to a stationary position. Cricketers maintain similar upper limb kinematics between overhead throwing approaches. However, throwing with a run-up approximately doubles the forces exerted on the shoulder at maximum external rotation, which is most likely caused by the greater dominant hip and lumbo-pelvic flexion noted. This may amplify the potential risk for shoulder injury when throwing.
PMID:34498548 | DOI:10.1080/17461391.2021.1979103