Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Aug 10:e13663. doi: 10.1111/eci.13663. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of consensus on the efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) treatment in COVID-19 patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of CP vs standard treatment/non-CP on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
METHODS: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched from December 2019 to 16th July 2021, for data from clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Risk estimates were pooled using a random-effect model. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for clinical trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
RESULTS: In total, 18 peer-review clinical trials, 3 preprints, and 26 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis of 18 peer-reviewed trials, CP use had a 31% reduced risk of all-cause mortality compared to standard treatment use (pooled risk ratio [RR]=0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.86, p=0.001, I2 =50.1%). Based on severity and region, CP treatment significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality in patients with severe and critical disease and studies conducted in Asia, pooled RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.81, p=0.001, I2 =0.0%, pooled RR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.92, p=0.013, I2 =0.0%, and pooled RR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.48- 0.80, p<0.001, I2 =20.3%, respectively. The meta-analysis of observational studies showed the similar results to the clinical trials.
CONCLUSIONS: CP use was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality in severe or critical COVID-19 patients. However, the findings were limited with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. Further studies with well-designed and larger sample size are needed.
PMID:34375445 | DOI:10.1111/eci.13663