Tag: pubmed

Arthritis Res Ther. 2024 May 28;26(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03344-3.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) provide more comprehensive and informative perspective on microstructural alterations of cerebral white matter (WM) than single-shell diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), especially in the detection of crossing fiber. However, studies on systemic lupus erythematosus patients without neuropsychiatric symptoms (non-NPSLE patients) using multi-shell diffusion imaging remain scarce.

METHODS: Totally 49 non-NPSLE patients and 41 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls underwent multi-shell diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Totally 10 diffusion metrics based on DKI (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, mean kurtosis, axial kurtosis and radial kurtosis) and NODDI (neurite density index, orientation dispersion index and volume fraction of the isotropic diffusion compartment) were evaluated. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and atlas-based region-of-interest (ROI) analyses were performed to determine group differences in brain WM microstructure. The associations of multi-shell diffusion metrics with clinical indicators were determined for further investigation.

RESULTS: TBSS analysis revealed reduced FA, AD and RK and increased ODI in the WM of non-NPSLE patients (P < 0.05, family-wise error corrected), and ODI showed the best discriminative ability. Atlas-based ROI analysis found increased ODI values in anterior thalamic radiation (ATR), inferior frontal-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), forceps major (F_major), forceps minor (F_minor) and uncinate fasciculus (UF) in non-NPSLE patients, and the right ATR showed the best discriminative ability. ODI in the F_major was positively correlated to C3.

CONCLUSION: This study suggested that DKI and NODDI metrics can complementarily detect WM abnormalities in non-NPSLE patients and revealed ODI as a more sensitive and specific biomarker than DKI, guiding further understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism of normal-appearing WM injury in SLE.

PMID:38807248 | DOI:10.1186/s13075-024-03344-3

Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):233-236. doi: 10.1370/afm.3100.

ABSTRACT

This study characterized adult primary care medical assistant (MA) staffing. National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (n = 1,252) data were analyzed to examine primary care practice characteristics associated with MA per primary care clinician (PCC) staffing ratios. In 2021, few practices (11.4%) had ratios of 2 or more MAs per PCCs. Compared with system-owned practices, independent (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76, P <0.05) and medical group-owned (OR = 2.09, P <0.05) practices were more likely to have ratios of 2 or more MAs per PCCs, as were practices with organizational cultures oriented to innovation (P <0.05). Most primary care practices do not have adequate MA staffing.

PMID:38806269 | DOI:10.1370/afm.3100

Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):187-194. doi: 10.1370/afm.3096.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Procedures are manual technical skills clinicians perform for their patients. Family physicians (FPs) acquire these skills during residency; most are undertaken in outpatient settings. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to describe the extent to which FPs perform the core procedures recommended by the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) and how this might have changed over time.

METHODS: The CAFM recommended a list of procedures all FP residents should perform competently after graduation. We modified this list for Medicare beneficiaries to enable matching with Current Procedural Terminology codes. We probed Medicare Part B databases for modified CAFM procedure claims submitted by FPs in 2021 and how these claims changed from 2014 to 2021.

RESULTS: In 2021, there were 904,278 modified CAFM procedures filed by 9,410 FPs in the outpatient setting. All procedures were clustered with respect to organ system (eg, musculoskeletal, skin, pulmonary). Beginning in 2014 and continuously through 2021, there was a 33% decrease in outpatient procedures filed and a 36% decrease in the number of FPs filing them.

CONCLUSIONS: Office-based procedures are integral to a primary care physician’s role, although the activity is rarely analyzed. At a time when the Medicare population is growing, the number of available FPs and the number of procedures they perform are not. This decrease might result from the changing scope of FP practice, new referral patterns, task shifting, and/or increased delegation to physician associates and nurse practitioners.

PMID:38806267 | DOI:10.1370/afm.3096

Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):254-258. doi: 10.1370/afm.3103.

ABSTRACT

There is great variation in the experiences of Latiné/e/x/o/a, Hispanic, and/or Spanish origin (LHS) individuals in the United States, including differences in race, ancestry, colonization histories, and immigration experiences. This essay calls readers to consider the implications of the heterogeneity of lived experiences among LHS populations, including variations in country of origin, immigration histories, time in the United States, languages spoken, and colonization histories on patient care and academia. There is power in unity when advocating for community, social, and political change, especially as it pertains to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI; sometimes referred to as DEI) efforts in academic institutions. Yet, there is also a critical need to disaggregate the LHS diaspora and its conceptualization based on differing experiences so that we may improve our understanding of the sociopolitical attributes that impact health. We propose strategies to improve recognition of these differences and their potential health outcomes toward a goal of health equity.

PMID:38806262 | DOI:10.1370/afm.3103

Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):208-214. doi: 10.1370/afm.3098.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly interrupted breast cancer screening, an essential preventive service in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the pandemic’s impact on overall and follow-up breast cancer screening using real-world health records data.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of women eligible for breast cancer screening through the study period from January 1, 2017 to February 28, 2022 using TriNetX Research Network data. We examined the temporal trend of monthly screening volume throughout the study period and compared the rate of adherence to follow-up screening within 24 months after the previous screening when the follow-up screening was due in the pre-COVID period vs the COVID period. To account for multiple screenings in the longitudinal data, we applied a logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations with adjustment for individual-level covariates.

RESULTS: Among 1,186,669 screening-eligible women, the monthly screening volume temporarily decreased by 80.6% from February to April 2020 and then rebounded to close to pre-COVID levels by June 2020. Yet, the follow-up screening rate decreased from 78.9% (95% CI, 78.8%-79.0%) in the pre-COVID period to 77.7% (95% CI, 77.6%-77.8%) in the COVID period. Multivariate regression analysis also showed a lower adherence to follow-up screening during the COVID period (odds ratio = 0.86; 0.86-0.87) and a greater pandemic impact among women aged 65 years and older and women of non-Hispanic “other” race (Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander).

CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had a transient negative effect on breast cancer screening overall and a prolonged negative effect on follow-up screening. It also exacerbated gaps in adherence to follow-up screening, especially among certain vulnerable groups, requiring innovative strategies to address potential health disparities in primary care.

PMID:38806260 | DOI:10.1370/afm.3098

Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):223-229. doi: 10.1370/afm.3107.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Continuity of care is broadly associated with better patient health outcomes. The relative contributions of continuity with an individual physician and with a practice, however, have not generally been distinguished. This retrospective observational study examined the impact of continuity of care for patients seen at their main clinic but by different family physicians.

METHODS: We analyzed linked health administrative data from 2015-2018 from Alberta, Canada to explore the association of physician and clinic continuity with rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations across varying levels of patient complexity. Physician continuity was calculated using the known provider of care index and clinic continuity with an analogous measure. We developed zero-inflated negative binomial models to assess the association of each with all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations.

RESULTS: High physician continuity was associated with lower ED use across all levels of patient complexity and with fewer hospitalizations for highly complex patients. Broadly, no (0%) clinic continuity was associated with increased use and complete (100%) clinic continuity with decreased use, with the largest effect seen for the most complex patients. Levels of clinic continuity between 1% and 50% were generally associated with slightly higher use, and levels of 51% to 99% with slightly lower use.

CONCLUSIONS: The best health care outcomes (measured by ED visits and hospitalizations) are associated with consistently seeing one’s own primary family physician or seeing a clinic partner when that physician is unavailable. The effect of partial clinic continuity appears complex and requires additional research. These results provide some reassurance for part-time and shared practices, and guidance for primary care workforce policy makers.

PMID:38806258 | DOI:10.1370/afm.3107

Respir Care. 2024 May 28;69(6):713-723. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11656.

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is one of the most effective therapies for chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is significantly underutilized. There are several patient-related, geographic, societal, and health system-related barriers to PR. People with chronic respiratory disease face a collectively high burden of treatments including health care provider visits, medications, oxygen and other durable medical equipment, and providers’ recommendation to undertake PR may be considered an added burden more than a likely benefit. Transportation difficulties, lack of insurance coverage, competing time priorities, low knowledge of PR, lack of perceived likely benefit, comorbidities, and other factors also pose obstacles to participation in PR for patients. Geographic availability of PR is heterogenous; in the United States, out-patient center-based PR programs are often not available within close proximity to patients’ residence, posing barriers to patients’ access to it. PR programs are lacking altogether in many areas; rural areas are particularly affected. Existing PR programs are often poorly funded and underresourced. Socioeconomic and racial disparities also influence patients’ likelihood of receiving PR. Also, health care professionals (HCPs) often do not refer their patients with chronic respiratory disease to PR, owing to a lack of knowledge and awareness of its content and benefits, patient candidacy, or of the referral process. A limited number of multidisciplinary HCPs trained in PR likely also contributes to limited access to PR for patients. Collectively, these multifaceted barriers to PR create unacceptable health care disparities. Strategies to address barriers to PR are urgently needed in order to enable individuals who need to receive it.

PMID:38806224 | DOI:10.4187/respcare.11656

Open Heart. 2024 May 28;11(1):e002642. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002642.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare aortic morphology between repaired coarctation patients and controls, and to identify aortic morphological risk factors for hypertension and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in coarctation patients.

METHODS: Repaired coarctation patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were included, followed-up and compared with sex-matched and age-matched controls. Three-dimensional aortic shape was reconstructed using patients’ CTA or MRA, or four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in controls, and advanced geometrical characteristics were calculated and visualised using statistical shape modelling. In patients, we examined the association of geometrical characteristics with (1) baseline hypertension, using multivariable logistic regression; and (2) cardiovascular events (CVE, composite of aortic complications, coronary artery disease, ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure hospitalisation, stroke, transient ischaemic attacks and cardiovascular death), using multivariable Cox regression. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method selected the most informative multivariable model.

RESULTS: Sixty-five repaired coarctation patients (23 years (IQR 19-38)) were included, of which 44 (68%) patients were hypertensive at baseline. After a median follow-up of 8.7 years (IQR 4.8-15.4), 27 CVEs occurred in 20 patients. Aortic arch dimensions were smaller in patients compared with controls (diameter p<0.001, wall surface area p=0.026, volume p=0.007). Patients had more aortic arch torsion (p<0.001) and a higher curvature (p<0.001). No geometrical characteristics were associated with hypertension. LASSO selected left ventricular mass, male sex, tortuosity and age for the multivariable model. Left ventricular mass (p=0.014) was independently associated with CVE, and aortic tortuosity showed a trend towards significance (p=0.070).

CONCLUSION: Repaired coarctation patients have a smaller aortic arch and a more tortuous course of the aorta compared with controls. Besides left ventricular mass index, geometrical features might be of importance in long-term risk assessment in coarctation patients.

PMID:38806222 | DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002642

BJGP Open. 2024 May 28:BJGPO.2024.0118. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0118. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care is important for patients with chronic conditions. Assigning patients to a named GP may increase continuity.

AIM: To examine if patients who were registered with a named GP at the onset of their first chronic disease had higher continuity at subsequent visits than patients who were only registered at a practice.

DESIGN & SETTING: Registry-based observational study in Region Skåne, Sweden. The study population included 66,063 patients registered at the same practice at least 1 year before the first chronic condition onset in 2009-2015.

METHOD: We compared patients registered with a named GP with patients only registered at a practice over a four-year follow-up period. The primary outcome was the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index, for all visits and for visits related to the chronic disease. Secondary outcomes were the number of GP, nurse and out-of-hours visits, ED visits, hospital admissions, and mortality. We used linear regression models, adjusted for patient characteristics (using entropy balancing weights) and for practice-level fixed effects.

RESULTS: Patients with a named GP at onset had 3-4 percentage points higher UPC, but the difference decreased and was not statistically significant after adjusting for patient and practice characteristics. Patients with a named GP made more visits, though not for the chronic condition. There were no statistically significant differences for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION: Registration with a GP at onset does not imply higher continuity at visits and is not linked to other relevant outcomes for patients diagnosed with their first chronic condition.

PMID:38806212 | DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0118

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 28;13(2):e002716. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002716.

ABSTRACT

The clinical quality improvement initiatives, led by the organisation’s Health Equity Working Group (HEWG), aim to support healthcare providers to provide equitable, quality hypertension care worldwide. After coordinating with the India team, we started monitoring the deidentified patient data collected through electronic health records between January and May 2021. After stratifying data by age, sex and residence location, the team found an average of 55.94% of our hypertensive patients control their blood pressure, with an inequity of 11.91% between male and female patients.The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using clinical quality improvement to improve hypertension care in the limited-resourced, mobile healthcare setting in Mumbai slums. We used the model for improvement, developed by Associates in Process Improvement. After 9-month Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, the average hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure improved from 55.94% to 89.86% at the endpoint of the initiative. The gender gap reduced significantly from 11.91% to 2.19%. We continued to monitor the blood pressure and found that the average hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure remained stable at 89.23% and the gender gap slightly increased to 3.14%. Hypertensive patients have 6.43 times higher chance of having controlled blood pressure compared with the preintervention after the 9-month intervention (p<0.001).This paper discusses the efforts to improve hypertension care and reduce health inequities in Mumbai’s urban slums. We highlighted the methods used to identify and bridge health inequity gaps and the testing of PDSA cycles to improve care quality and reduce disparities. Our findings have shown that clinical quality improvement initiatives and the PDSA cycle can successfully improve health outcomes and decrease gender disparity in the limited-resource setting.

PMID:38806206 | DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002716