Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Discrimination in Medical Settings across Populations: Evidence from the All of Us Research Program

Am J Prev Med. 2024 Jun 4:S0749-3797(24)00174-0. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.018. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) contributes to health care disparities in the United States, but few studies have determined the extent of DMS in a large national sample and across different populations. This study estimated the national prevalence of DMS and described demographic and health-related characteristics associated with experiencing DMS in seven different situations.

METHODS: Survey data from 41,875 adults participating in the All of Us Research Program collected in 2021-2022 and logistic regression were used to examine the association between sociodemographic and health-related characteristics and self-reported DMS among adults engaged with a health care provider within the past 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed in 2023-2024.

RESULTS: About 36.89% of adults reported having experienced at least one DMS situation. Adults with relative social and medical disadvantages had higher prevalence of experiencing DMS. Compared to their counterparts, respondents with higher odds of experiencing DMS in at least one situation identified as female, non-Hispanic Black, having at least some college, living in the South, renter, having other living arrangement, being publicly insured, not having a usual source of care, having multiple chronic conditions, having any disability, and reporting fair or poor health, p<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a high prevalence of DMS, particularly among some population groups. Characterizing DMS may be a valuable tool for identifying populations at risk within the health care system and optimizing the overall patient care experience. Implementing relevant policies remains an essential strategy for mitigating the prevalence of DMS and reducing health care disparities.

PMID:38844146 | DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.05.018

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Awareness of Peripheral IV Catheters Among Nurses, Physicians, and Trainees: A Prospective Cohort Study

Am J Infect Control. 2024 Jun 4:S0196-6553(24)00532-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.05.018. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVs) are the most frequently used invasive device in hospitalized patients. These devices are not benign and may put patients at risk of serious complications. However, clinician awareness of their presence is variable and poorly understood.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-center, observational point prevalence study to assess awareness of PIV presence among clinicians caring for hospitalized patients in four hospitals between 05/2018 and 02/2019 located in Michigan, United States of America. We first assessed patients for presence of a PIV then interviewed their providers. Differences in awareness by provider type was assessed via chi-square tests; p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed on Stata MP v16 (College Station, TX).

RESULTS: A total of 1,385 patients and 4,003 providers were interviewed. Nurses had the greatest awareness of overall PIV presence, 98.6%, while attendings were correct 88.1% of the time. Nurses were more likely to correctly assess PIV presence and exact location than physicians (67.7% vs. < 30% for all others). Awareness of PIV presence did not significantly vary among providers in patients with multiple vascular access device(s), on contact precautions, or those receiving active infusions.

CONCLUSIONS: Given the ubiquity of PIVs and known complications, variable awareness of vascular devices is problematic. Methods to increase awareness to ensure appropriate care and removal appear necessary.

PMID:38844143 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.05.018

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Glycaemic Status and Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Nationwide Cohort Study of Four Million Adults using Korean National Health Screening Data

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Jun 4:S1078-5884(24)00469-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.042. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study aimed to confirm the previously reported inverse association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using large population based data. It also investigated the associations between AAA with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and new onset DM (not yet treated).

METHODS: A representative dataset was obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Participants who were aged ≥ 50 years and received a national health examination in 2009 were included and followed until 31 December 2019. Glycaemic status was defined based on fasting plasma glucose level and the relevant diagnostic codes. AAA was ascertained using records of medical facility usage with relevant diagnostic codes or aneurysm repair surgery. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association between glycaemic status and AAA, with adjustment for confounders. Additionally, the interactions between glycaemic status and subgroups based on baseline characteristics were examined.

RESULTS: The study population comprised 4 162 640 participants. Participants with IFG or DM were significantly more likely to be male, older, and have comorbidities compared with normoglycaemic participants at baseline. The incidence of AAA was lower in participants with IFG or DM compared with normoglycaemic participants. The AAA risk was lower in patients with DM than in patients with IFG, and decreased linearly according to glycaemic status: the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 – 0.91) for IFG, 0.72 (95% CI 0.67 – 0.78) for newly diagnosed DM, 0.65 (95% CI 0.61 – 0.69) for DM duration < 5 years, and 0.47 (95% CI 0.44 – 0.51) for DM duration ≥ 5 years compared with the normoglycaemia group. Both IFG and DM were related to reduced AAA risk in all subgroups, suggesting an independent association.

CONCLUSION: Both IFG and DM, even when not treated with antihyperglycaemic medication, were associated with a lower incidence of AAA. The AAA risk decreased linearly according to DM duration.

PMID:38844129 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.042

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Long COVID impacts people’s ability to work: cross-sectional study in Aotearoa New Zealand

N Z Med J. 2024 Jun 7;137(1596):102-104. doi: 10.26635/6965.6530.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38843555 | DOI:10.26635/6965.6530

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Exploring melanoma shifts: a two-decade analysis in New Zealand

N Z Med J. 2024 Jun 7;137(1596):35-42. doi: 10.26635/6965.6430.

ABSTRACT

AIMS: New Zealand melanoma incidence rates are amongst the highest in the world. The study aims to provide information on the incidence of cutaneous melanoma in New Zealand from 2000 to 2022.

METHODS: De-identified data were extracted from the New Zealand Cancer Registry using the ICD-10 code for malignant melanoma (C34) and melanoma in situ (MIS) (D03) from 2000 to 2022. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate melanoma incidence rates.

RESULTS: Invasive melanoma (IM) incidence rates demonstrated an increasing trend from 2000 to 2008 (+1.10 per 100,000 person-years per year), followed by an inflection point at 2008 and then a decreasing trend from 2008 to 2022 (-0.28 per 100,000 person-years per year), which was not statistically different from zero/no change. MIS incidence increased from 30.3 to 72.1 per 100,000 person-years between 2000 and 2022.

CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IM in New Zealand has plateaued in the last decade and was associated with an increase in MIS incidence over the same period. While this trend is encouraging, further research is required to investigate whether there is an actual decline in IM incidence.

PMID:38843548 | DOI:10.26635/6965.6430

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

News Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Media and the Public’s Negative Emotions: Computational Study

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 6;26:e48491. doi: 10.2196/48491.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Social media has become an increasingly popular and critical tool for users to digest diverse information and express their perceptions and attitudes. While most studies endeavor to delineate the emotional responses of social media users, there is limited research exploring the factors associated with the emergence of emotions, particularly negative ones, during news consumption.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to first depict the web coverage by news organizations on social media and then explore the crucial elements of news coverage that trigger the public’s negative emotions. Our findings can act as a reference for responsible parties and news organizations in times of crisis.

METHODS: We collected 23,705 Facebook posts with 1,019,317 comments from the public pages of representative news organizations in Hong Kong. We used text mining techniques, such as topic models and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, to analyze news components and public reactions. Beyond descriptive analysis, we used regression models to shed light on how news coverage on social media is associated with the public’s negative emotional responses.

RESULTS: Our results suggest that occurrences of issues regarding pandemic situations, antipandemic measures, and supportive actions are likely to reduce the public’s negative emotions, while comments on the posts mentioning the central government and the Government of Hong Kong reveal more negativeness. Negative and neutral media tones can alleviate the rage and interact with the subjects and issues in the news to affect users’ negative emotions. Post length is found to have a curvilinear relationship with users’ negative emotions.

CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the impacts of various components of news coverage (issues, subjects, media tone, and length) on social media on the public’s negative emotions (anger, fear, and sadness). Our comprehensive analysis provides a reference framework for efficient crisis communication for similar pandemics at present or in the future. This research, although first extending the analysis between the components of news coverage and negative user emotions to the scenario of social media, echoes previous studies drawn from traditional media and its derivatives, such as web newspapers. Although the era of COVID-19 pandemic gradually brings down the curtain, the commonality of this research and previous studies also contributes to establishing a clearer territory in the field of health crises.

PMID:38843521 | DOI:10.2196/48491

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III EVOKE-01 Study

J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 31:JCO2400733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00733. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported.

METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen, and AGA treatment received or not) to SG (one 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel (one 75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety.

RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population (SG, n = 299; docetaxel, n = 304), 55.4% had one previous line of therapy. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 6.0-24.0). The primary end point was not met. There was a numerical OS improvement for SG versus docetaxel (median, 11.1 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.04]; one-sided P = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death.

CONCLUSION: Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.

PMID:38843511 | DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00733

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Automated Lugano Metabolic Response Assessment in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Avid Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Deep Learning on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 6:JCO2301978. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01978. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence can reduce the time used by physicians on radiological assessments. For 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas, obtaining complete metabolic response (CMR) by end of treatment is prognostic.

METHODS: Here, we present a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated treatment response assessments according to the Lugano 2014 classification. The proposed four-stage method, trained on a multicountry clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741) and tested in three independent multicenter and multicountry test sets on different non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and different lines of treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02257567, NCT02500407, 20% holdout in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741), outputs the detected lesions at baseline and follow-up to enable focused radiologist review.

RESULTS: The method’s response assessment achieved high agreement with the adjudicated radiologic responses (eg, agreement for overall response assessment of 93%, 87%, and 85% in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, respectively) similar to inter-radiologist agreement and was strongly prognostic of outcomes with a trend toward higher accuracy for death risk than adjudicated radiologic responses (hazard ratio for end of treatment by-model CMR of 0.123, 0.054, and 0.205 in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, compared with, respectively, 0.226, 0.292, and 0.272 for CMR by the adjudicated responses). Furthermore, a radiologist review of the algorithm’s assessments was conducted. The radiologist median review time was 1.38 minutes/assessment, and no statistically significant differences were observed in the level of agreement of the radiologist with the model’s response compared with the level of agreement of the radiologist with the adjudicated responses.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the proposed method can be incorporated into radiologic response assessment workflows in cancer imaging for significant time savings and with performance similar to trained medical experts.

PMID:38843483 | DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.01978

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Implementation of Universal Pan-Cancer Germline Genetic Testing in an Arab Population: The Jordanian Exploratory Cancer Genetics Study

JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Jun;10:e2400068. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00068.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Germline genetic testing (GGT) significantly affects cancer care. While universal testing has been studied in Western societies, less is known about adoption elsewhere.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 3,319 unselected, pan-cancer Jordanian patients diagnosed between April 2021 and September 2022 received GGT. Pathogenic germline variant (PGV) frequency among patients who were in-criteria (IC) or out-of-criteria (OOC; 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria) and changes in clinical management in response to GGT results were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test with significance level P < .05.

RESULTS: The cohort was predominantly female (69.9%), with a mean age of 53.7 years at testing, and 53.1% were IC. While patients who were IC were more likely than patients who were OOC to have a PGV (15.8% v 9.6%; P < .0001), 149 (34.8%) patients with PGVs were OOC. Clinical management recommendations in response to GGT, including changes to treatment and/or follow-up, were made for 57.3% (161 of 281) of patients with high- or moderate-risk PGVs, including 26.1% (42 of 161) of patients who were OOC.

CONCLUSION: Universal GGT of patients with newly diagnosed cancer was successfully implemented in Jordan and led to identification of actionable PGVs that would have been missed with guidelines-based testing.

PMID:38843472 | DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00068

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin or Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase II Study of the AIO Hepatobiliary-YMO Cancer Groups (NIFE-AIO-YMO HEP-0315)

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 6:JCO2301566. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01566. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: First-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA.

METHODS: NIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon’s optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population.

RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic.

CONCLUSION: Treatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

PMID:38843469 | DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.01566