Tag: pubmed

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S20. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798908.85532.2d.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intestinal strictures are a complication of the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD)) that can lead to bowel obstruction and therapy failure. Intestinal strictures occurring after long-standing tissue damage and repair are more frequently reported in CD, but colonic strictures can occur in UC. However, there is a paucity of literature that comprehensively summarizes the available information regarding the incidence and etiology of colonic strictures in UC. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports on the incidence of colonic strictures in UC patients.

METHODS: Four independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles describing the incidence of colonic strictures in UC published from inception to June 2021. Primary outcomes were (1) overall incidence of colonic strictures; (2) 10-year incidence of colonic strictures; and (3) incidence of colonic strictures containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between the pre-biologic era and post-biologic era. The meta-analysis was performed and the statistics were 2-tailed. Finally, probability of publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and with Egger’s test.

RESULTS: Eleven studies reporting on a total of — patients with colonic strictures were included in the analysis after comprehensive search. This yielded a pooled colonic stricture incidence rate of 5.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-7.8). The incidence rate of colonic strictures was lower in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (2.6% vs 6%; p = 0.14). The pooled 10-year colonic stricture rate was 3.2% (95% CI 1.5-6.8). The pooled 10-year incidence rate of colonic strictures was lower in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (1% vs 1.8%; p = 0.1). The pooled incidence of strictures with associated high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC) was 21.9% (95% CI 12.2-36.5). The incidence rate of HGD or CRC in colonic strictures was higher in the post-biologic era compared to the pre-biologic era but the difference was not statistically significant (23.6% vs 20.4%; p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of colonic strictures in UC showed that the overall pooled incidence and 10-year incidence of colonic strictures in UC are low. There was a trend towards lower incidences of UC strictures in the post-biologic era, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. While the overall incidence of colonic strictures, in UC is low, a high proportion of colonic strictures are associated with HGD or CRC, even in the biologic era. Therefore, this study provides further support for importance of stricture biopsy and surgical evaluation for colectomy in the UC patient with colonic stricture.

PMID:37461993 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798908.85532.2d

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S19-S20. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000805324.84795.58.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urgency, the immediate need to defecate, is common in ulcerative colitis (UC). The frequently used patient reported outcome (PRO)-2 for UC includes only rectal bleeding and stool frequency. We sought to investigate the association of urgency in UC patients with 1) quality of life (QoL) domains and 2) future UC hospitalizations, steroid prescriptions, and colectomy.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional and then a subsequent longitudinal study within IBD Partners, a patient-powered research network. We described associations of levels of urgency in UC patients with PROMIS QoL domains (depression, anxiety, social satisfaction, fatigue, sleep, and pain). Next, a longitudinal cohort determined associations between baseline urgency and subsequent clinical outcomes including UC hospitalization, steroid prescription, or colectomy within 12 months. We used bivariate statistics and logistic regression models to describe independent associations.

RESULTS: A total of 632 UC patients were included in the cross-sectional study. After adjusting for clinical variables, rectal bleeding, and stool frequency, “hurry”, “immediately” and “incontinence” increased the odds of social impairment by 2.05 [1.24-3.4] (p = 0.005), 2.76 [1.1-6.74] (p = 0.028), and 7.7 [1.66-38.3] (p = 0.009) respectively compared to “no hurry”. Urgency also significantly increased the odds of depression, anxiety, and fatigue. In the multivariate pooled logistic regression of the longitudinal cohort, Urgency was associated with a significant stepwise increase in risk of hospitalizations, steroids, and colectomy. “Hurry”, “immediately” and “incontinence” increased the odds of colectomy within 12 months by 1.41 [1.15-1.72] (p < 0001), and 3.29 [2.13-5.09] (p < 0001).

CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that urgency is a PRO independently associated with compromised QoL in patients with UC. Urgency is associated with future risk of hospitalizations, steroid prescription, and colectomy. Our findings support the consideration of urgency as a UC-specific PRO and its use as an outcome in clinical trials to capture QoL and risk of clinical decompensation.

PMID:37461991 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000805324.84795.58

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798880.74975.18.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) prevalence is rising. Quality of life (QOL) in chronic illness is affected by various physical and psychosocial factors. Recent studies in other chronic illnesses have used remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) to help predict changes in disease activity and provide opportunities for patient self-management. It has been proposed that bowel inflammation can lead to suboptimal sleep, circadian rhythm disruption and even additional immune system activation. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a validated metric that has been used to predict outcomes and help manage other disease states. To date, there is limited data on the benefit of RPM in IBD care. We wish to explore the potential benefit of the Whoop Strap (new wearable technology device) as a method of RPM for IBD patients.

METHODS: We recruited patients with Ulcerative Colitis from our tertiary care IBD center 18 years and older willing to wear the Whoop Strap 3.0 for 12 months with support from the Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 2020 Department of Medicine House Staff Grant; Clinical Trial Identifier is NCT04333810. During this time, participants were encouraged to use the Whoop mobile application to record symptoms. Physiologic metrics of interest included sleep, resting heart rate (RHR), and HRV; each were correlated to IBD related symptoms. Additionally, we performed monthly “check-ins” to collect disease activity (SCCAI), mood (HADS) and stress (PSS4) questionnaire data. Descriptive statistics were utilized along with correlation coefficient testing to explore potential relationships between Whoop metrics, disease activity scores and patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS: Enrollment is ongoing with 7 participants, one of which was lost to follow up. Of note, 2 patients proactively reached out to communicate concern for an underlying disease flare as they noticed significant change in their Whoop metrics in conjunction with worrying symptoms. Patient 1 subsequently had serologic testing after having increased HRV and elevated RHR several days prior to symptoms; results were consistent with active inflammation exhibiting a rise in C-reactive protein from 0.25 mg/dL in 2020 to 2.82 mg/dL. Fecal calprotectin was also elevated at 566 ug/g. Colonoscopy is scheduled for the near future. Patient 2 also had noticeable HRV and RHR changes alongside significant sleep disturbances, which has prompted additional testing.

CONCLUSION: Remote physiologic monitoring is a feasible way to give patients ownership of their medical care and involve them in the diagnostic and treatment process of their underlying IBD. As exhibited with our preliminary results, the Whoop device appears easy to use and may empower patients to reach out to providers even before symptoms occur, leading to an expedited evaluation for increased disease activity. Our feasibility study will hopefully lead to larger prospective efforts utilizing wearable technology devices such as the Whoop in IBD patients.

PMID:37461987 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798880.74975.18

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S17. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798864.82003.45.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody against the p40 subunit of IL-12/23. It is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis. We performed a retrospective study to demonstrate the efficacy and outcomes of UST in CD patients who received prior anti-TNF therapies.

METHODS: We collected a list of all patients who received UST until May 2021. In addition, the list was screened for patients who were on anti-TNFs for treatment of CD in the past. Data was collected for patient demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease phenotype, age of initiation of UST, prior biologic therapy, time since last biologic therapy, concomitant use of steroids or immunomodulator, inflammatory markers, induction of remission, deep remission. Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: We identified 34 patients (59% females) with CD on UST who failed at least one anti-TNFs before induction with UST. Clinical remission was documented in 70.5% of patients. 29 percent of patients who achieved clinical remission were on concomitant steroids or immunomodulators at the time of induction of remission along with UST. Fifty percent of patients had a fistulizing disease, of which 70% achieved clinical remission with UST. C-reactive protein (CRP) was reported in 70 percent of patients. Mean CRP prior to initiation of UST was 2.4. CRP trended down to 1.98 (p = 0.079, 95% CI: -0.064-1.08). Eighteen percent of patients had fecal calprotectin reported. Mean fecal calprotectin before initiation of UST was 386, and it trended down 175 while on UST (p = 0.148, 95% CI: -106.25-528.46).

CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that remission rates in CD patients who have failed prior anti-TNF therapy are high, including for patients with perianal disease. In patients with fistulizing CD, we suggest using UST for higher rates of remission after induction. We also found that for fecal calprotectin, although an excellent surrogate of colon inflammation, compliance amongst patients remains low.

PMID:37461983 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798864.82003.45

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S17. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000805320.60076.03.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory condition and has been increasing in prevalence in the United States, with a 30-40% increase over the past few decades. Osteoporosis can be seen in up to 40% of IBD patients. Screening for osteoporosis in IBD patients involves the use of DEXA scans and is recommended by the IBD Cornerstone Committee for select patients, including steroid use > 3 months consecutively or a total of 1 year in the past 2 years, family history of osteoporosis, malnutrition, amenorrheic or post-menopausal. Our quality improvement study looked to improve osteoporosis screening among gastroenterologists.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all IBD patients within the St. Luke’s Network and extrapolated data on age (>50 in male and >65 in female), sex, chronic glucocorticoid use (3 month consecutively or cumulative), osteoporosis/osteopenia diagnosis, vitamin D (vit-D) levels, and DEXA scan between 2019 to 2021. We gave a 5-minute presentation on current DEXA screen recommendations for patients with IBD on 5/27/2021 to all the network’s gastroenterologists, which totaled 12. We performed a pre and post education survey consisting of 5 questions on provider knowledge and comfortability with osteoporosis screening. We assessed provider knowledge, as well as rates of osteoporosis screening. All statistical analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS for Windows Version 26. Chi Square tests were used to compare two groups in categorical variables while Mann-Whitney tests were done to compare continuous variables like age and vit-D levels.

RESULTS: There were a total of 5442 patients; 3927 patients before the educational intervention on 5/27/2021 and 1515 patients after the intervention. Both pre and post intervention groups were balanced in terms of age, gender, smoking status, and alcohol risk. Percent of DEXA scans were similar between both groups (13.0% vs 12.3%, p=0.5). DEXA screening rates among patients with chronic steroid use pre-intervention vs post-intervention was 44.45 vs 42.4% respectively. Vit-D levels compared between both groups was not statistically significant (30.5 vs 31.8, p=0.1). Surveys conducted before and after the intervention showed an overall increase in percentage of agreement responses about knowledge and confidence in DEXA screening (88.5% vs 97.5%).

CONCLUSION: DEXA scanning can help detect premature decrease in bone mineral density and provide physicians with the opportunity to prevent further morbidity. Our study showed no difference in DEXA screening rates before and after intervention. However, there was an increase in provider knowledge based on post-intervention surveys. A similar study showed that it took three interventions, including educational presentation, flyers, and on screen EMR reminders for there to be a sustainable improvement in the rate of DEXA screening. Our project may have required additional interventions to produce an effect and thus reinforces the need for further efforts to improve osteoporosis screening in IBD patients.

PMID:37461982 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000805320.60076.03

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S16-S17. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798852.94629.98.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frequently, existing therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not achieve complete remission of the disease and are commonly associated with adverse effects. Therefore, patients regularly turn to complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). International CAM use in IBD patients ranges from 21% to 60%. There are no reported statistics of CAM use in the Mexican population who suffer IBD. This study´s objective was to determine the prevalence and characterize the use of CAM in our IBD population.

METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study in patients diagnosed with IBD belonging to our Institution’s IBD center. The results were analyzed with measures of relative frequency, central tendency, and dispersion.

RESULTS: A total of 52 patients with IBD (78% ulcerative colitis and 22% Crohn’s disease) were included, 38.5% were exposed to CAM. A total of 27% used it as an aid in their IBD treatment. The remaining 11.5% used it for other reasons. Patients exposed to CAM for IBD averaged 51 ± 19 years, 64% were female and 71% had at least an undergraduate degree. The most used CAMs were acupuncture (42.8%), herbal (35.7%) and homeopathy (35.7%). Half of the patients used concomitantly two or more modalities, and 91.6% of the patients knew their diagnosis at the time that CAM was being used. The median exposure time to CAM was 4.5 ± 40.7 months. The main reasons for the use of CAM in IBD patients was as a complementary therapy in 58.3%, as the perception of lack of improvement was present in 33.3% of patients. Twenty-five percent of patients used CAM after a healthcare professional recommended it. CAM was used in 83.2% of patients with conventional treatment (Mesalamine: 74.6%, Mesalamine + Azathioprine: 8.3%) and only 16.5% were on biological therapy. A total of 58.3% CAM users perceived improvement in their symptoms. Currently 25% still use some modality of CAM. No statistically significant differences were found in sociodemographic variables and clinical outcomes when comparing the IBD group exposed to CAM vs the unexposed group.

CONCLUSION: Exposure to CAM for IBD treatment had a prevalence of 27%. The main CAM modalities for IBD patients were acupuncture, herbal, and homeopathy. No relationship was demonstrated between the use of CAM in IBD patients and their clinical outcomes.

PMID:37461980 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798852.94629.98

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S16. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798844.44337.f4.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sleep disorders occur recurrently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The relationship between poor sleep quality and IBD activity has been subject to scarce attention. Poor sleep quality could be considered a relevant extraintestinal manifestation and a potential marker of subclinical inflammation, which could increase the severity of inflammation and the risk of relapse, however, we do not have enough information to confirm this hypothesis. Objective: Describe the impact of IBD on the quality of sleep, in patients treated in a referral hospital.

METHODS: Observational, analytical, and cross-sectional study. Patients with diagnosis of IBD treated at Centro Médico Nacional “20 de Noviembre” were evaluated. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to measure sleep quality. IBD activity was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw index for Crohn’s disease (CD) and the Mayo scale for Ulcerative Colitis (UC).

RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included, the Pittsburgh Sleep Index Questionnaire (PSQI) was performed, after informed consent was signed. Patients had a mean age of 52. Fifty five percent were female, 65% had UC. Biological therapy was administered to 70.5%. In CD 89% were in remission and 11% in moderate activity. In UC 48.5% were in remission, 45.5% had mild activity and 6% had moderate activity. Eighty percent of the patients did not use hypnotic drugs. Patients with UC in remission had a bad perception of sleep quality in 68%, quite good sleep quality in 18% and very good sleep quality in 12% with a PSQI of 10.5 ± 3.2. In patients with mild activity, the perception of sleep quality was very good in 6%, quite good in 46%, quite bad in 40% and very bad in 6%, with a PSQI of 8 ± 3.7. In patients with moderate activity, 100% had a rather bad perception of sleep quality with a PSQI of 11 ± 1.4. For CD in remission the perception of sleep was quite bad in 43%, quite good in 43%, very bad in 6% and very good in 6% with a PSQI of 9 ± 4.3. In patients with moderate activity 50% had a very bad sleep quality perception and 50% a fairly good sleep quality perception with a PSQI of 14 ± 4.2.

CONCLUSION: In this study a statistically significant association was obtained between PSQI and the perception of sleep reported by the patients, with a p < 0.005. Further research is still needed to better characterize sleep disturbances in this population. Due to the sample size, a prospective, randomized study is required to confirm these findings. The present analysis has no conflict of interest.

PMID:37461978 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798844.44337.f4

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S15. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798836.33683.7f.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades there has been significant research linking inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to depression. The chronicity of symptoms coupled with the financial burden of treatment costs, missed days of work/school and interpersonal relationship stress are contributing factors in the diagnosis of depression. The prevalence of depression within the IBD community is 15% and depressive symptoms are noted in 20% of patients. Furthermore, IBD patients with severe uncontrolled disease have higher rates of depression (40.7%) than those in remission (16.5%). The association between IBD and depression is linked to lower quality of life, poor medication compliance, worse disease outcomes, increased hospitalization, and higher suicidal risk. Early diagnosis and treatment of depression in IBD patients is paramount in achieving and maintaining IBD disease remission. While the association between IBD and depression is well-known, identifying depression can be a challenge. Review of recent literature shows that depression is under screened in IBD clinics. We present a prospective quality improvement study at a robust IBD center evaluating the impact of a validated depression screen (PHQ-9) on identifying depression compared to standard of care.

METHODS: We compared the prevalence of depression in the IBD clinic in the control group using the history and diagnosis of depression and compared it against the intervention group after HQ-9 screening. Control group patient data was collected from June 2020 to July 2020 via virtual and in person visits. Intervention group PHQ-9 data was collected in person visits from January – March 2020 and post-intervention data collection was placed on hold until November 2020 due to the COVID pandemic. One randomly selected patient from each clinic session was asked to participate in the study at the time of visit. The primary end point was to compare the rates of depression and identify any barriers in providing early treatment for depression. The secondary endpoint was to identify high risk patients that are prone to depression. Categorical variables were analyzed by chi square analysis or fischer exact tests. Numerical data were analyzed using T-test.

RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were screened. 60 patients were randomized to the control group (i.e. EMR based review for depression) and 51 patients were screened via survey during in person clinic visit. The identified depression rate from control vs intervention group is 20% vs. 35% (p = 0.071). Rates of depression were 15% in non-fistulizing Crohn’s disease vs. 41.4% in fistulizing Crohn’s disease (p = 0.003). Multivariate model for predicting depression noted to be significant for extra-intestinal manifestations OR of 3.06 (1.03, 9.12) p = 0.045 and age OR of 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) p = 0.042. Control vs. intervention identification of depression in patients with extra-intestinal manifestations is notable for OR of 3.31 (1.15, 9.52) p = 0.026 in the univariate model and OR of 3.30 (1.07, 10.16) p = 0.038 in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSION: Key findings including identification of depression is higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. Though the data is not statistically significant, this is likely secondary to the small sample size in the setting of the pandemic. In addition, univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant finding that the older the age of the patient, the less likely they are to have depression. Our data showed that the mean age of depressed patients was 38.3 compared to nondepressed patients whose mean age is 47.1. Further analysis can help elucidate this finding, for example identifying if older patients are being treated for depression or more likely to seek out therapists compared to younger patients. Univariate analysis also revealed that intestinal Crohn’s disease was a risk factor for depression. This is possibly secondary to the severity of disease in these individuals, especially if their IBD is causing an impact on their quality of life. Looking into the number of hospitalizations, days off from work or school, and coexisting medical diagnoses can allow us to further understand if depression stems from their disease. Given preliminary findings, we plan to continue this study for a larger sample size and further determine if there is a significant delay in identifying depression with the current standard of care.

PMID:37461976 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798836.33683.7f

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S14. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798820.49929.ce.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risks for gastrointestinal infections. Single-center studies in Michigan and New York report 17-31% positive enteropathogen tests in patients with symptomatic IBD. Population-based studies are lacking, particularly on factors that determine who undergo testing. Health inequities may exist in the care of patients with IBD where certain groups systematically experience social and/or economic disparities. We aim to assess sociodemographic and healthcare factors associated with enteropathogen testing of hospitalized IBD patients.

METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 770 patients with IBD who had 1,189 hospital admissions for primary symptoms consistent with IBD flares/enteric infections at 3 hospitals (tertiary referral teaching, community, and county) in the largest healthcare system in Rhode Island from January 2017-March 2019. Using modified Poisson regression to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), we assessed enteropathogen testing status as a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in separate models.

RESULTS: Patients with IBD hospitalized with symptoms consistent with IBD flares or enteric infections disproportionately had Crohn’s disease (69% vs. 31% UC). Patients were 47 years old on average, 60% women, 79% non-Hispanic white, 13% Hispanic, and 7% non-Hispanic Black. Over half (55%) were privately insured, 42% publicly insured, and 2% uninsured. Over half (55%) of patients were treated with glucocorticoids within 1 week of hospitalization while 35% were on biologics. The top 5 primary symptoms for hospitalization were abdominal pain (63%), GI bleeding (8%), fever (8%), vomiting (7%), and diarrhea (7%). Enteropathogen testing (may be >1) was obtained in 46% of hospitalizations: 42% tested for C. difficile; 23 % tested for Salmonella spp., Shigella spp./enteroinvasive E. coli, Campylobacter spp., and Shiga toxin-producing organisms; and 15% had extensive testing for 22 enteropathogens (13 bacteria, 5 viruses, and 4 parasites). 10% of the tests were positive, most commonly for C. difficile (5%), E. coli spp (0.6%), Campylobacter spp (0.5%), Salmonella (0.3%), and Norovirus (0.3%). While gender differences in testing were not observed (female 45%, male 46%, F:M, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90,1.15), Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo enteropathogen testing than non-Hispanic white patients (58% vs 44%; RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43). Relative to patients hospitalized at the tertiary referral teaching hospital, patients at the county hospital were 29% less likely (95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and those at the community hospital were 22% (95% CI 0.78-1.01) less likely to have enteropathogen testing. Enteropathogen testing occurred most frequently among the privately insured 48%, while uninsured were comparatively 20% less likely and publicly insured were 10% less likely to undergo testing, though neither comparison was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: Racial/ethnic (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White) and healthcare settings (county vs tertiary referral teaching hospital) differences in enteropathogen testing patterns were observed in adults with IBD hospitalized primarily for GI symptoms at the state of Rhode Island’s largest healthcare system. Further studies to assess health inequities, including sociodemographic and organizational differences, in the healthcare delivery in IBD are warranted.

PMID:37461973 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798820.49929.ce

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S12-S13. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798796.64423.34.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), which can be divided into Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), is an immune mediated disease featured by gastrointestinal tract involvement. Hepatic disease, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cirrhosis, cholelithiasis, hepatic thromboembolic events and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are some hepatic complications presented by IBD patients. Since these hepatic disorders have a higher prevalence in IBD patients, ultrasonography is a noninvasive low-cost versatile tool, that allows to identify these manifestations at early stages. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the prevalence of hepatic diseases in patients with IBD.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in a single IBD center, Brazil. This study considered clinical and sociodemographic data of these individuals, besides the evaluation of disease activity, biochemical tests, and liver ultrasound with doppler. Statistical analysis: descriptive, association tests.

RESULTS: 71 patients were included, 34 had CD and 37 had UC, mean age 45.32 ± 13.59 years, 63.38% women. Among CD patients, 42.42% have ileocolonic involvement, 50% penetrating behavior and 39.4% perianal involvement. Among patients with UC, most patients have pancolitis (72.22%). Most patients were in clinical (CD: 93.55%, UC: 63.89%) and endoscopic (47.14%) remission. The main medications used were azathioprine (46.48%), infliximab (40.85%), salicylates (28.17%), corticosteroids (16.9%) and adalimumab (11.27%). According to ultrasound, NAFLD was found in 32 (45.07%) patients: 40.63% mild, 40.63% moderate and 18.75% severe. Furthermore, we found a correlation between liver steatosis and blunt liver edge (p < 0.0155). Only 2 patients presented with choledocholithiasis. One patient had features of chronic liver disease such as irregular surface, heterogeneity of a hepatic parenchymal echo and bluntness of the liver edge. No signs of thrombosis were found in portal, splenic or superior mesenteric veins.

CONCLUSION: A higher prevalence of NAFLD was found in patients with IBD, and no signs of thrombosis were found in the splanchnic system.

PMID:37461967 | DOI:10.14309/01.ajg.0000798796.64423.34