Tag: pubmed

J Adolesc Health. 2021 Dec 10:S1054-139X(21)00556-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.030. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to (1) examine the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the U.S., including those who had a dental visit in the last year but not a medical visit and (2) to determine an association between last visit to the dentist and HPV vaccination status.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2018, including participants 9-26 years. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the study population and calculate the prevalence of HPV vaccination in adolescents and young adults, including those who had a dental visit in the last year but not a medical visit. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between last visit to the dentist and HPV vaccination status.

RESULTS: In total, 38.6% of participants were vaccinated for HPV, with higher prevalence of vaccination in those with the following characteristics: female, older age, higher income, higher education level, and having medical insurance. Participants who had a dental visit in the last year had an HPV vaccination rate of 40.8%. Of those who had a dental visit and were not vaccinated for HPV, 12.5% did not have a medical visit. Having a dental visit in the last year increased the odds of being vaccinated for HPV (odds ratio 1.69, confidence interval 1.26-2.28).

CONCLUSIONS: Dentists see a significant number of adolescents and young adults who are unvaccinated for HPV in a given year and could serve as an access point for HPV vaccine delivery in the future.

PMID:34903425 | DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.030

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Dec 11:S0889-5406(21)00755-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.031. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Various treatment modalities exist to improve and correct Class I malocclusion. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of nonextraction (NE), premolar extraction (PME), and mandibular incisor extraction (MIE) treatment modalities in subjects presenting with Class I malocclusion.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital using pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts along with intraoral photographs of 90 orthodontic subjects. These subjects were divided equally into NE, PME, and MIE groups and scored using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON), and peer assessment rating (PAR) indexes. Nonparametric tests were run to compare pretreatment and posttreatment scores and to evaluate the percentage and categorical changes for the treatment modalities. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P ≤0.001) were seen between the pretreatment and posttreatment scores for all modalities. Statistically significant improvements were seen between the 3 treatment modalities for the PAR (P = 0.010) and ICON (P = 0.003) indexes. Significant categorical improvements were found for the Aesthetic Component (AC) (P = 0.012) among the 3 groups. Pairwise comparison revealed significant differences between the NE and MIE groups (ICON, P = 0.001; AC, P = 0.018) and PME and MIE groups (PAR, P = 0.002; ICON, P = 0.007; AC, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS: Posttreatment scores of all indexes were reduced, with significant differences found among the treatment modalities for all except the Dental Health Component index. The pairwise comparison revealed suboptimal occlusal results with the MIE group. Good occlusal and esthetic treatment outcomes were achieved with the PME and NE groups.

PMID:34903420 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.031

Burns. 2021 Nov 6:S0305-4179(21)00305-3. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.10.018. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The first states began implementing the Medicaid expansion provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014. Studies have yet to address its impact on burn patients.

METHODS: Burn patients in geographic regions that expanded Medicaid coverage were compared to patients in regions that did not expand Medicaid before and after implementation of the ACA using bivariate statistics and a difference-in-differences model. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having Medicaid insurance. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of Medicaid insurance.

RESULTS: Of 25,331 discharges, we found greater increases in Medicaid coverage after the ACA in the Medicaid expander regions (23.4-40.2%) compared to the non-expander regions (18.5-20.1%). The difference-in-differences estimate between the expander and non-expander regions was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.11-0.18, p < 0.001). Patients admitted in expander regions were more likely to be insured by Medicaid (OR 1.57 [95%CI 1.21-2.05]), as were patients of Black race (OR 1.25 [95%CI 1.19-1.32), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.29 [95%CI 1.14-1.46]), and female sex (OR 1.59 [95%CI 1.11-2.27]). We also found a significant interaction between time period (pre-ACA/post-ACA) and expander region location (OR 2.10 [95%CI 1.67-2.62]).

CONCLUSIONS: The Medicaid expansion provision of the ACA led to increased Medicaid coverage among burn patients which was significantly higher in areas with widespread implementation of the expansion.

PMID:34903411 | DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2021.10.018

Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Dec 10:S0090-8258(21)01625-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.021. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy plus radiation (Cis-RT + CP) did not demonstrate superiority in prolonging relapse-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with stage III or IVA endometrial carcinoma. The impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL), neurotoxicity (NTX) and psychometric properties of the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms subscale during treatment and up to 1 year are described herein.

METHODS: QOL assessments were scheduled at baseline, 6 weeks (post completion of RT (Cis-RT + CP) or prior to cycle 3 (CP)), then 18 weeks (end of treatment) and 70 weeks (1 year after the end of treatment) after starting treatment. QOL instruments included the FACT-En TOI, FACT/GOG-neurotoxicity (Ntx) subscale (short), and the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms subscale.

RESULTS: At the end of treatment, patients receiving Cis-RT + CP reported a statistically significant decreased QOL when compared to CP. The decline in QOL was reflected in physical well-being, functional well-being, and endometrial cancer specific concerns, but the minimally important differences (MID) were not considered clinically meaningful. Patients in both groups reported increased chemotherapy-induced Ntx symptoms with the CP group having worse scores and reaching peak symptoms at the time of chemotherapy completion. Patients on Cis-RT + CP reported statistically significantly worse GI symptoms after radiation therapy compared to patients on CP, this occurred across assessment intervals, though the MID was not meaningful. Psychometric evaluations indicated that the GI symptom scale is reliable, valid, and responsive to change.

CONCLUSIONS: PROs indicate that the chemoradiotherapy group experienced worse HRQoL and GI toxicity compared to patients randomized to chemotherapy alone for locally advanced endometrial cancer though based on the MID, these were not clinically meaningful differences. The GI symptom subscale was a reliable and valid scale that has value for future trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00942357.

PMID:34903380 | DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.021

J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Dec 10:S0363-5023(21)00620-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.09.024. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The second palmar interosseous muscle is innervated solely by the ulnar nerve, and second palmar interosseous pinch (2IP) strength may be a good indicator of ulnar nerve motor function. The goal of this study was to describe the 2IP test and establish its normative values, stratified by age, sex, and dominance.

METHODS: Volunteers were recruited to participate in this study at various community locations. Patients over the age of 18 years were eligible for this study. Demographic information on all subjects was collected. The volunteers were asked to pinch a hydraulic pinch gauge between the index and middle finger proximal phalanges with the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints flexed and without recruiting the thumb. Three 2IP measurements were taken for each hand. Descriptive statistics and analysis of covariance were performed to determine the effect of age, sex, dominance, and side on 2IP. We analyzed the 2IP strength using the 2IP test across 3 trials to determine whether it was affected by repeated testing.

RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (45 ± 21 years, 55% women, 87% right-hand dominant). There was no statistically significant difference between dominant and nondominant hands or among the 3 trials. There was a statistically significant correlation between age and 2IP strength ranging between 0.32 and 0.44 kg. Age and sex showed a statistically significant association with 2IP strength, with patients of older age and women having weaker 2IP.

CONCLUSIONS: We determined normative values for 2IP strength using a sample from a normal population. More studies are needed to validate these results.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Second interosseous pinch strength may be a useful tool to assess ulnar nerve function.

PMID:34903391 | DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.09.024

Am J Surg. 2021 Dec 4:S0002-9610(21)00728-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.002. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The 21st Century Cures Act requires that institutions release all electronic health information (EHI) to patients immediately. We aimed to understand patient and clinician attitudes toward the immediate release of EHI to patients.

METHODS: Patients and clinicians representing distinct specialties at a single academic medical center completed a survey to assess attitudes toward the immediate release of results. Differences between patient and clinician responses were compared using chi-square and student’s t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A two-sided significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests.

RESULTS: 69 clinicians and 57 patients completed the survey. Both patients (89.7%) and clinicians (80.6%) agreed or strongly agreed-here after referred to as agreed, that providing patients with access to their health information is necessary in delivering high-quality care. However, 62.7% of clinicians agreed that results released immediately would be more confusing than helpful, whereas the minority of patients agreed with this statement (15.8%) (p < 0.05). Providers were also more likely to disagree that patients are comfortable independently interpreting blood work results (p < 0.05), radiology results (p < 0.05) and pathology reports (p < 0.05). With regard to timing, the majority of patients (75.1%) felt their provider should contact them within 24 h of the release of an abnormal result, whereas only 9.0% of clinicians agreed with this timeframe (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSIONS: Patients and clinicians value information transparency. However, the immediate release of results is controversial, especially among clinicians. The discrepancy between patient and clinician perceptions underlines the importance of setting expectations about the communication of results. Additionally, our results emphasize the need to implement strategies to help improve patient comprehension, decrease patient distress and improve clinician workflows.

PMID:34903369 | DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.002

Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec 10:S0007-0912(21)00747-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.019. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exposure to general anaesthesia in children may be related to deficits in certain areas of cognition. It is unclear if these deficits could be measured in the immediate postoperative period in young children. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the trajectory of cognitive function in the domains of processing speed, working memory, and fine motor skills amongst children aged 2.5-6 yr who underwent general anaesthesia for elective surgery.

METHODS: Children who were scheduled to receive general anaesthesia for surgery were recruited for assessment of cognitive function at three times: preoperatively, 1-2 weeks postoperatively, and 3 months postoperatively. Assessments included processing speed, working memory, and fine motor skills. To assess longitudinal changes in the cognitive outcomes, linear mixed models were built with visit number included as a categorical variable and subject-specific random intercepts.

RESULTS: Sixty-one children (33 girls [54%]) enrolled in the study. Twenty-three children (38%) had received general anaesthesia previously. Significant improvements in picture memory, cancellation, and the processing speed composite were found at Visit 2. The improvement in cancellation and processing speed composite remained significant at Visit 3. Statistically significant improvement in Mullen fine motor score was noticed at Visit 3 compared with Visit 1. The pattern of results did not depend upon prior anaesthesia exposure.

CONCLUSIONS: General anaesthesia for elective surgery in young children was not associated with declines in working memory, processing speed, and fine motor skills in the first 3 months postoperatively, including in children with prior exposure to anaesthesia.

PMID:34903364 | DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.019

J Health Popul Nutr. 2021 Dec 13;40(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41043-021-00278-3.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates the lower intake of fruits and vegetables than the recommended daily amount. Study aimed at determining the effects of peer education intervention on the consumption of fruits and vegetable in housewives.

METHODS: A quasi-experimental was conducted with 130 housewives referring to health care centers in Bandar Abbas, Iran. Sixty-five subjects were recruited in each of the intervention and the control groups. Intervention group were divided into three subgroups each receiving a seven-sessions educational programs (lecturing and group discussion) through peers about the importance of benefits of fruits and vegetables consumption. Participants were followed for two months. Data were collected using a questionnaire in two stages of pre- and post-intervention. Differences in the outcome before and after the intervention were tested using T-test and paired T-test.

RESULTS: The daily servings of fruits and vegetables in the intervention group increased from 1.73 to 4.20 and in the control group from 1.96 to 2.16; a statistically significant difference was also observed between the groups (P < 0.001). After the intervention benefits and self-efficacy of fruits and vegetables consumption significantly increased and perceived barriers of fruits and vegetables consumption significantly decreased in the intervention group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Peer education improves benefits and self-efficacy, reduces barriers, and increases the daily servings of fruits and vegetables in housewives.

PMID:34903305 | DOI:10.1186/s41043-021-00278-3

Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;162:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.059.

ABSTRACT

Transradial (TR) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes and reduces the risk of major bleeding compared with transfemoral (TF) access. However, data on gender-stratified outcomes based on vascular access are limited. Databases were queried to find relevant articles. Primary outcomes, including major bleeding complications, mortality, and secondary outcome including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accidents, were analyzed using a random-effect model to calculate unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of TR-PCI and TF-PCI between the genders. A total of 9 studies comprising 3,889,257 patients (389,580 in the TR arm and 3,499,677 in the TF arm) were included. Males comprised 73% and 67% of the TR and TF arms, respectively. TR-PCI was associated with lower major bleeding (pooled OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.64, p = 0.00; female OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71, p = 0.00; male OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.73, p = 0.00) and mortality (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.66, p = 0.00; female OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.71, p = 0.27; male OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.75, p = 0.00) regardless of gender as compared with TF-PCI. Furthermore, TR-PCI also showed lower MACE (pooled OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.84, p = 0.00; female OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.70, p = 0.00; male OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98, p = 0.00) as compared with TF-PCI in both genders. On analysis of interaction magnitude of the difference of favor of female and male for TR-PCI showed no statistically significant measurable difference. Periprocedural myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents were not statistically different in TR and TF-PCI and were not different based on gender. In conclusion, TR-PCI was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, mortality, and MACE irrespective of gender. In conclusion, TR-PCI should be the default access.

PMID:34903346 | DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.059

Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 14;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00217-0.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antimuscarinics for the prevention or treatment of catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD).

METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (from 1987 to July 2021) were used to search randomized controlled trials. The PRISMA checklists were followed. RevMan5.4.0 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 1165 patients were involved in the analysis. The study reported that the incidence of CRBD observed in the antimuscarinics group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 0-, 1-, 2-, and 6-h after drug therapy (P = 0.001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0005, and P = 0.001, respectively). For side effects, there were not statistical differences between the antimuscarinics group and the control group, mainly including dry mouth (risk ratio (RR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95 to 1.80, P = 0.09), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.90, P = 0.87), facial flushing (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.43 to 2.61, P = 0.90), and blurred vision (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.35 to 2.58, P = 0.91). Besides, rescue analgesics were required less in the antimuscarinics group than in the control group (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.80, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the control group, the antimuscarinics group had a significant improvement on CRBD, the patients were well tolerated and the use rate of rescue analgesics was low.

PMID:34903279 | DOI:10.1186/s13741-021-00217-0