J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Sep;28(9):911-915. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_413_25. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Irrigation is an essential component of successful endodontics. Various chemical irrigants have been assessed for their efficacy. Newer alternatives are being currently investigated to overcome the shortcomings of the currently used irrigants.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of phytic acid in calcium ion removal and its effect on the microhardness of the root canal dentin during endodontic procedure.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was an in vitro study conducted on 45 recently extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars. They were decoronated and sectioned. One half of the tooth was used to evaluate calcium ion loss, while the other half was used to analyze microhardness.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc analysis was used. P <0.001 was considered significant.
RESULTS: There was a less significant decrease in calcium level of root dentin after treatment with phytic acid as compared with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). There was no significant difference between phytic acid and EDTA in relation to calcium ion loss and microhardness with their respective control group.
CONCLUSION: 1% Phytic acid is a suitable irrigating solution compared to 17% EDTA, due to its less demineralizing effect on radicular dentin.
PMID:40964641 | PMC:PMC12440339 | DOI:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_413_25