Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Fremanezumab for the Treatment of Patients With Migraine and Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder: The UNITE Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Neurol. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0806. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Migraine and major depressive disorder are frequently comorbid; however, evidence evaluating the efficacy of preventive migraine therapy in patients with both diseases is limited.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in adults with migraine and comorbid major depressive disorder.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The UNITE study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial consisting of a 4-week screening period, 12-week double-blind period, and 12-week open-label extension (OLE), conducted between July 9, 2020, and August 31, 2022. The trial was conducted at 55 centers across 12 countries. Eligible patients were adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), history of major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria for 12 or more months before screening, and active symptoms of depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score of 10 or more) at screening.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive monthly fremanezumab (225 mg) or matched placebo. All patients in the OLE received quarterly fremanezumab (675 mg).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days during the 12-week double-blind period.

RESULTS: Of the 540 patients screened for the study, 353 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.3] years; 310 female [88%]; EM, 48%; CM, 52%) were eligible and randomized to receive fremanezumab (n = 175) or placebo (n = 178). Mean (SE) change from baseline in monthly migraine days during the 12-week double-blind period was -5.1 (0.50; 95% CI, -6.09 to -4.13) for fremanezumab and -2.9 (0.49; 95% CI, -3.89 to -1.96) for placebo (P <.001). Mean (SE) change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 Items score at week 8 was -6.0 (0.55; 95% CI, -7.10 to -4.95) for fremanezumab and -4.6 (0.54; 95% CI, -5.66 to -3.55) for placebo (least squares mean [SE] difference: -1.4 [0.61]; 95% CI, -2.61 to -0.22; P = .02). Adverse events were consistent with other fremanezumab trials. Results were maintained throughout the OLE.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Treatment with fremanezumab compared with placebo resulted in significant reductions in monthly migraine days and depressive symptoms. No new safety concerns were observed. To the authors’ knowledge, this was the first placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, specifically designed to assess patients with migraine and comorbid depressive disorder, to demonstrate significant improvements in migraine and depressive symptoms with a single pharmacological intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04041284.

PMID:40323613 | DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0806

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Oral Microbiome Profile of the US Population

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8283.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The oral microbiome likely plays key roles in human health. Yet, population-representative characterizations are lacking.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the composition, diversity, and correlates of the oral microbiome in US adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the population-representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2009 to 2012. Microbiome data were made publicly available in 2024. NHANES participants were aged 18 to 69 years and provided oral rinse samples in 1 of 2 consecutive NHANES cycles (2009-2010 and 2011-2012).

EXPOSURES: Demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, anthropometric, metabolic, and clinical characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Oral microbiome measures, characterized through 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, included α diversity (observed amplicon sequence variants [ASVs], Faith phylogenetic diversity, Shannon-Weiner Index, and Simpson Index); β diversity (unweighted UniFrac, weighted UniFrac, and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity); and prevalence and relative abundance at phylum level through genus level. Analyses accounted for the NHANES complex sample design.

RESULTS: This study included 8237 US adults aged 18 to 69 years, representing 202 314 000 individuals (102 813 000 men [50.8%]; mean [SD] age, 42.3 [14.4] years; 9.3% self-reported as Mexican American, 12.1% as non-Hispanic Black, 64.7% as non-Hispanic White, 5.9% as other Hispanic, and 8.1% as other non-Hispanic individuals). The oral microbiome encompassed 37 bacterial phyla, 99 classes, 212 orders, 446 families, and 1219 genera. Five phyla (Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria) and 6 genera (Veillonella, Streptococcus, Prevotella 7, Rothia, Actinomyces, and Gemella) were present in nearly all US adults (weighted prevalence, >99%). These genera were the most abundant, accounting for 65.7% of total abundance. Observed ASVs showed a quadratic pattern with age (peak at 30 years), were similar by sex, significantly lower among non-Hispanic White individuals, and increased with greater body mass index (BMI), alcohol use, and periodontal disease severity. All covariates together accounted for a modest proportion of oral microbiome variability as measured by β diversity: R2 = 8.7% (95% CI, 8.4%-9.1%) for unweighted UniFrac, R2 = 7.2% (95% CI, 6.6%-7.7%) for weighted UniFrac, and R2 = 6.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-6.7%) for Bray-Curtis matrices. By contrast, relative abundance of a few genera explained a high percentage of variability in β diversity for weighted UniFrac: Aggregatibacter (R2 = 22.4%; 95% CI, 22.1%-22.8%), Lactococcus (R2 = 21.6%; 95% CI, 20.9%-22.3%), and Haemophilus (R2 = 18.4%; 95% CI, 18.1%-18.8%). Prevalence and relative abundance of numerous genera were associated with age, race and ethnicity, smoking, BMI categories, alcohol use, and periodontal disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cross-sectional study of the oral microbiome in US adults showed that a few genera were universally present and a different set of genera explained a high percentage of oral microbiome diversity across the population. This comprehensive characterization provides a contemporary reference standard for future studies.

PMID:40323603 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8283

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Rare Disease Drug Repurposing

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8330.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Treatments are urgently needed for the more than 9500 rare diseases with no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies. Although repurposing can be less time- and cost-intensive compared with novel drug development, hurdles have impeded systematic repurposing. Rare disease nonprofit organizations (RDNPs) are well-positioned to overcome barriers and have spearheaded rare disease repurposing efforts for decades. However, no comprehensive data are available on the state of rare disease repurposing or features of successful efforts.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the state of rare disease drug repurposing, identify factors associated with successful outcomes, and share thematic insights using the interactive Repurposing of All Drugs, Mapping All Paths (ROADMAP) Project web tool.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The ROADMAP study was a qualitative study using a mixed-methods analysis of US-based RDNP leaders and their stakeholders, including a national survey and semistructured interviews of RDNP leaders, conducted from September 29, 2021, to January 6, 2022. Surveys and interviews revealed themes associated with RDNP strategies, timelines, and support mechanisms. Data were analyzed from January 22, 2024, to April 23, 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary survey outcome was the repurposing project stage (abandoned, early, clinical, late, or successful). Qualitative outcomes included themes characterizing repurposing experiences. Two random forest models of drug- and disease- specific as well as organization-specific variables were used to evaluate factor importance toward inferring the project stage. Orthogonal significance testing was conducted using Spearman rank correlation, and P values in each model were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using a Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

RESULTS: Representative organizations submitted survey responses, including 147 of 698 potential US-based RDNPs. The median RDNP age was 10 years (IQR, 5-20 years), and the median annual revenue was $355 390 (IQR, $90 028-$946 108). Among 34 leaders who were interviewed, representing 25 RDNPs, 23 were female (67.6%), and the RDNPs had a median age of 15 years (IQR, 6-19 years) and a median revenue of $670 719 (IQR, $193 587-$1 830 890). Among the surveyed RDNPs, 58 of 138 (42.0%) specifically identifying their involvement in repurposing supported repurposing projects, and 94 drugs were in various stages of repurposing, of which 23 met success criteria (5 with US Food and Drug Administration approval and 18 with off-label use with subjective benefit). Survey factors associated with successful outcomes included nonprofit-supported patient recruitment into trials (Gini importance, 3.90; ρ = 0.50; adjusted P < .001) and provision of nonfinancial research support (Gini importance, 0.69; ρ = 0.33; adjusted P = .02). Interview themes were synthesized into a 5-stage repurposing framework with roadblocks and recommendations that included (1) enabling drug repurposing, (2) identifying a drug therapy, (3) validating a drug therapy, (4) clinical use and testing, and (5) reaching an optimal end point for clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this qualitative study of RDNP repurposing suggest that several opportunities were associated with successful outcomes and can be considered to optimize systematic repurposing among RDNPs, external collaborators, and policymakers with the use of an interactive tool showcasing insights to facilitate data-driven drug repurposing.

PMID:40323602 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8330

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Web-Based Cancer Symptom Self-Management System: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258353. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8353.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Patients with cancer and cancer survivors frequently experience symptoms that increase the need for health care services and impair quality of life. Effective symptom management is critical for comprehensive patient-centered cancer care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding a bilingual (English and Spanish), web-based self-management program to an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated patient-reported outcome for cancer (cPRO) assessment in reducing symptom burden and health care resource use (HCRU).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This patient-level randomized clinical trial was performed at the Northwestern Memorial HealthCare system in Chicago, Illinois. Participants included 1614 adult patients with cancer or cancer survivors in 30 clinics who were enrolled between April 1, 2020, and April 8, 2023, and followed up for 12 months until May 8, 2024.

INTERVENTIONS: Usual care (UC) consisting of an EHR-integrated cPRO assessment or enhanced care (EC), which offered an additional tailored web-based self-management program.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and physical function collected at baseline and monthly for 12 months. Secondary outcomes included HCRU measures (inpatient and/or observation visits and days, emergency department and/or urgent care visits, and days of hospital stay).

RESULTS: A total of 1614 patients were included in the analysis, with 804 randomized to EC and 810 to UC. The mean (SD) age was 61 (13) years; 1095 patients (67.8%) were female. Only 419 EC participants (52.1%) accessed the website, with only 197 (47%) returning; the median time per visit was 45 seconds (IQR, 45-105 seconds). There were no statistically significant differences between EC and UC across the cPRO outcomes over 12 months. The mean change from baseline at each assessment time point for treatment effects (EC vs UC) ranged from -0.19 (95% CI, -0.86 to 0.33; P = .64) for physical function to 0.11 (95% CI, -0.75 to 0.79; P = .87) for fatigue. Zero-inflated negative binomial and logistic regression models showed no significant differences in HCRU outcomes: inpatient and/or observation visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72-1.12), emergency department and/or urgent care visits (IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84-1.16), and days of hospital stay (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, adding a bilingual web-based self-management program to EHR-integrated cPRO did not reduce symptom burden or HCRU compared with cPRO alone. Low engagement with the web-based program highlights the need for strategies to enhance engagement and tailor interventions to those who would benefit most.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03988543.

PMID:40323601 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8353

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Maternal Disability and Emergency Department Use for Infants

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258549. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Infants have among the highest rates of emergency department (ED) visits of all age groups. Women with disabilities experience significant social disparities, may experience barriers accessing child primary care, and may seek care in the ED.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ED use among newborns and infants (hereafter infants) of women with or without disabilities, overall and by timing and acuity of the ED visit.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study analyzed data for all live-born infants in Ontario, Canada, born to women with or without a disability from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2021. Data were analyzed March 2023 to October 2024.

EXPOSURE: Maternal physical, sensory, or intellectual or developmental disability or multiple disabilities status was ascertained using diagnostic algorithms applied to health care encounters before delivery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was any ED visit between an infant’s hospitalization discharge date and their first birthday, and by timing and acuity. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between maternal disability and the main outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and infant sex and year of birth.

RESULTS: Of 1 596 932 total infants, there were 139 698 (8.7%) born to women with a physical disability, 48 112 (3.0%) to women with a sensory disability, 2547 (0.2%) to women with an intellectual or developmental disability, and 10 312 (0.6%) to women with multiple disabilities. The remaining 1 396 263 infants (87.4%) were born to a woman without a recognized disability. Among women without a disability, 558 965 infants (40.0%) had an ED visit in the first year of life (incidence rate, 1.11 per 1000 person-days). Compared with this referent group, infants born to a woman with a disability of a physical (46.9%; 1.30 visits per 1000 person-days; adjusted HR [AHR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.13-1.15]), sensory (45.2%; 1.25 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.10]), or intellectual or developmental (55.4%; 1.55 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30]) nature or with multiple disabilities (51.0%; 1.42 visits per 1000 person-days; AHR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.22]) were more likely to have an ED visit. Similar patterns were observed for ED visits at fewer than 28 days from delivery, from 28 to 365 days, and for ED visits for high-acuity, moderate-acuity, and low-acuity reasons.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this population-based cohort study, infants of women with disabilities were more likely to use the ED, indicating a need for accessible family supports and improved early child primary care access.

PMID:40323599 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8549

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Medicaid Costs and Outcomes for Patients Treated in an Outpatient Telepsychiatry Clinic

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258558. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8558.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Evidence of cost savings attributable to indicated and timely care remain rare in psychiatry. Interventions to provide evidence-based psychiatric care to Medicaid patients that lower total costs of care are particularly challenging.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate Medicaid costs and care outcomes associated with use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicaid patients using and not using the services of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic (Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana) in 2022. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2024.

EXPOSURE: Receipt of care through an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Differences in Medicaid costs and cost subtypes between telepsychiatry patients and controls were assessed. Quality metrics, including inpatient hospitalizations, hospital readmissions, and admissions from the emergency department, were also compared.

RESULTS: In total, there were 2686 patients using the outpatient telepsychiatry clinic’s services (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 30.55 [14.67] years) and 2686 propensity-matched controls (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 31.37 [15.92] years). Across categories examined, the telepsychiatry patients had care costs per member per month (PMPM) similar to those for propensity-matched control patients ($685.5 [95% CI, $632.9-$738.2] vs $734.0 [95% CI, $645.7-$822.3]; P = .10) over the study period. PMPM costs to Medicaid from the telepsychiatry clinic’s patients were higher for professional services vs control patients ($464.0 [95% CI, $443.4-$484.5] vs $388.4 [95% CI, $368.1-$408.7]; P < .001) but were lower for inpatient hospitalization fees ($201.6 [95% CI, $146.2-$228.7] vs $260.6 [95% CI, $220.2-$341.5]; P = .04). Telepsychiatry clinic patients had a 38.0% lower mean annualized hospitalization rate per 1000 patients than controls (274.3 [95% CI, 237.1-311.6] hospitalizations per 1000 patients vs 442.6 [95% CI, 396.5-488.7] hospitalizations per 1000 patients; P < .001) and a 17.9% lower rate of admissions from the emergency department (patients vs controls, 299.7 admissions [47.7%] vs 519.0 admissions [58.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of 5372 patients, use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic’s services was associated with decreases in inpatient hospitalization rates and lower rates of admissions from the emergency department, with similar costs to Medicaid. These findings suggest that outpatient telepsychiatry care could play an important role in reducing hospital admissions among patients enrolled in Medicaid.

PMID:40323598 | DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8558

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Parental Technology Use in a Child’s Presence and Health and Development in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JAMA Pediatr. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0682. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Parental technology use in a child’s presence (hereafter, PTU), often referred to as technoference, is a growing concern in family dynamics, and no studies have quantitatively synthesized associations with children’s health and development.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize literature on associations between PTU in their child’s presence and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, and sleep in early childhood.

DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed studies from MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest published from inception to July 2024.

STUDY SELECTION: A total of 6212 studies were initially identified. Studies were included if they examined associations between PTU in the presence of their apparently healthy children (birth to age 4.9 years) and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, or sleep.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Random-effect models were conducted to determine the pooled estimates of the associations and moderating effects of the type of exposure (distraction/interruption). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Association between PTU in the child’s presence and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, and sleep.

RESULTS: Twenty-one studies involving 14 900 participants from 10 countries were included in the meta-analysis. Significant associations were found between parental technology use in the child’s presence and cognition (r = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.04), internalizing behavior and emotions (r = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.19), externalizing behavior (r = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.21), prosocial behavior (r = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02), attachment (r = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01), and screen time (r = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.32). No moderating effects of the type of PTU exposure on any associations were found. No study examined motor development, physical activity, or sleep.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Parents’ use of technology in their child’s presence was negatively associated with cognitive and psychosocial outcomes and screen time among young children, although the effect sizes were small. Further research focusing on potential impacts on physical activity, sleep, and motor skills is needed. Understanding these associations is crucial for informing research and guidelines aimed at minimizing the potential negative effects of this phenomenon on early childhood development.

PMID:40323594 | DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0682

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Change of TMJ Space Volume After Mandibular Setback Surgery With Intended Manual Condylar Positioning

J Craniofac Surg. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011422. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Temporal mandibular joint (TMJ) space volume is pivotal in upholding optimal joint function and occlusal stability. Mandibular setback surgery can impact TMJ space volume due to condylar positioning adjustments. This study aims to investigate the changes in TMJ space volume following mandibular setback surgery with intended manual condylar positioning.

METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 20 patients of class III (skeletal), who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy and BSSO surgery at the OMFS Department of PNUDH between 2015 and 2022 by one surgeon. CBCT scans were obtained preoperatively (T0) and at specified postoperative time points (T1) and (T2). The groups were categorized into group A (Total space volume), group B (non-asymmetric), and group C (asymmetric). TMJ space volume measurements were taken using CBCT imaging software. Each slice of the TMJ space was drawn manually using specialized software. The measured areas in each slice were added to determine the TMJ volumes, and the statistical analysis was done.

RESULTS: Preliminary findings from this study indicate that there was a highly significant difference in TMJ space volume between group A, group B, and group C at T0, T1, and T2 following surgery. However, there were no significant differences within the groups, which means that the intended manual condylar positioning gives stability to the TMJ joint space.

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that mandibular setback surgery with intended manual condylar positioning can lead to transient changes in TMJ space volume, with subsequent recovery and adaptation.

PMID:40323583 | DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011422

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Marital status and risk of cardiovascular disease – a multi-analyst study in epidemiology

Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01235-8. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

In multi-analyst studies, several analysts use the same data to independently investigate identical research questions. Multi-analyst studies have been conducted mainly in psychology, social sciences, and neuroscience, but rarely in epidemiology. Sixteen analyst groups (24 researchers) with backgrounds mainly in statistics, mathematics, and epidemiology were asked to independently perform an analysis on the influence of marital status (never married versus cohabiting married) on cardiovascular outcomes. They were asked to use data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), a panel study of 140,000 persons aged 50 years and above from 28 European countries and Israel, and to provide an effect estimate, a comment on their results, and the full syntax of their analyses. In additional analyses beyond the multi-analyst approach, one group selected an exemplary regression model and varied definitions of exposure and outcome and the confounder adjustment set. Each analysis was unique. The size of the 16 datasets used for the analyses ranged from 15,592 to 336,914 observations. The effect estimates (odds ratios, hazard ratios, or relative risks) ranged from 0.72 to 1.02 (reference: cohabiting married) in strictly or partly cross-sectional analyses and from 0.95 to 1.31 in strictly longitudinal analyses. The choice of regression models, adjustment sets for confounding, and variations in the precise definition of exposure and outcome, all had only small effects on the effect estimates. The range of results was mainly due to differences from cross-sectional versus longitudinal analyses rather than to single analytical decisions each of which had less influence.

PMID:40323573 | DOI:10.1007/s10654-025-01235-8

Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Removal of high concentrations of zinc, cadmium, and nickel heavy metals by Bacillus and Comamonas through microbially induced carbonate precipitation

Biodegradation. 2025 May 5;36(3):40. doi: 10.1007/s10532-025-10131-7.

ABSTRACT

Heavy metal pollution in urban freshwater, driven by anthropogenic activities, poses significant risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health due to its toxicity and persistence. Recently, urease-producing bacteria have gained attention for their ability to remove heavy metals through microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). In this study, eight urease-producing bacteria were exposed to individual solutions of zinc (Zn2+), cadmium (Cd2+), and nickel (Ni2+) at concentrations ranging from 0 to 6 mM to assess their resistance. Three strains-Bacillus subtilis HMZC1 (B2), Bacillus sp. HMZCSW (B6), and Comamonas sp. HMZC (B11)-survived at 4 mM and 6 mM, while most others could not tolerate 4 mM. Their urea-degrading ability was tested at different pH levels, identifying an optimal pH of 7 for MICP. Heavy metal carbonate precipitation experiments at 4 mM and 6 mM revealed that all three strains achieved > 93% removal of Zn2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ within 72 h. Comamonas sp. HMZC exhibited the highest efficiency, achieving > 95% removal of certain heavy metals at 6 mM. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in heavy metal removal efficiencies among the strains for certain treatment conditions (Cd2+ and Zn2+ at 4 mM), although not all comparisons reached statistical significance. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Diffraction confirmed the morphology and composition of the precipitated heavy metal carbonates. Our findings demonstrate that urease-producing bacteria can effectively immobilize multiple heavy metals, highlighting the MICP process as a practical and sustainable biological approach for ecological restoration and wastewater treatment.

PMID:40323541 | DOI:10.1007/s10532-025-10131-7