Lancet HIV. 2024 Jun;11(6):e345. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00129-2.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38816138 | DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00129-2
Tag: statistics
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Jun;165(6):611-613. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.01.016.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38816078 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.01.016
BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e079123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079123.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of adults with suspected acute community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) on hospitalisation, evaluate their prediction performance for CAP and compare the performance of the model to the initial assessment of the physician.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multicentre study.
SETTING: The data originated from the INfectious DisEases in Emergency Departments study and were collected prospectively from patient interviews and medical records. The study included four Danish medical emergency departments (EDs) and was conducted between 1 March 2021 and 28 February 2022.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 954 patients admitted with suspected infection were included in the study.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: The primary outcome was CAP diagnosis assessed by an expert panel.
RESULTS: According to expert evaluation, CAP had a 28% prevalence. 13 diagnostic predictors were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to build the prediction model: dyspnoea, expectoration, cough, common cold, malaise, chest pain, respiratory rate (>20 breaths/min), oxygen saturation (<96%), abnormal chest auscultation, leucocytes (<3.5×109/L or >8.8×109/L) and neutrophils (>7.5×109/L). C reactive protein (<20 mg/L) and having no previous event of CAP contributed negatively to the final model. The predictors yielded good prediction performance for CAP with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 (CI 0.77 to 0.92). However, the initial diagnosis made by the ED physician performed better, with an AUC of 0.86 (CI 84% to 89%).
CONCLUSION: Typical respiratory symptoms combined with abnormal vital signs and elevated infection biomarkers were predictors for CAP on admission to an ED. The clinical value of the prediction model is questionable in our setting as it does not outperform the clinician’s assessment. Further studies that add novel diagnostic tools and use imaging or serological markers are needed to improve a model that would help diagnose CAP in an ED setting more accurately.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04681963.
PMID:38816044 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079123
BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e082339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082339.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate co-prescribing of sedatives hypnotics and opioids.
DESIGN: Retrospective study evaluating the association of patient characteristics and comorbidities with coprescribing.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the national Merative MarketScan Database between 2005 and 2018, we identified patients who received an incident sedative prescription with or without subsequent, incident opioid prescriptions within a year of the sedative prescription in the USA.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Coprescription of sedative-hypnotics and opioids.
RESULTS: A total of 2 632 622 patients (mean (SD) age, 43.2 (12.34) years; 1 297 356 (62.5%) female) received incident prescriptions for sedatives over the course of the study period. The largest proportion of sedative prescribing included benzodiazepines (71.1%); however, z-drugs (19.9%) and barbiturates (9%) were also common. About 557 845 (21.2%) patients with incident sedatives also received incident opioid prescriptions. About 59.2% of these coprescribed patients received opioids coprescription on the same day. Multivariate logistic regression findings showed that individuals with a comorbidity index score of 1, 2 or ≥3 (aOR 1.19 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.21), 1.17 (95% C 1.14 to 1.19) and 1.25 (95% C 1.2 to 1.31)) and substance use disorder (1.21 (95% C 1.19 to 1.23)) were more likely to be coprescribed opioids and sedatives. The likelihood of receiving both opioid and sedative prescriptions was lower for female patients (aOR 0.93; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94), and those receiving a barbiturate (aOR 0.3; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.31) or z-drugs (aOR 0.67; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.68) prescriptions at the index date.
CONCLUSIONS: Coprescription of sedatives with opioids was associated with the presence of comorbidities and substance use disorder, gender and types of sedatives prescribed at the index date. Additionally, more than half of the coprescribing occurred on the same day which warrants further evaluation of current prescribing and dispensing best practice guidelines.
PMID:38816043 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082339
BMJ. 2024 May 30;385:q1196. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q1196.
NO ABSTRACT
PMID:38816027 | DOI:10.1136/bmj.q1196
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 May 29;9(1):e001469. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001469.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Considering the putative role of light in myopia, and variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, educational and environmental factors across ethnicities, we objectively investigated light exposure patterns in Indian school children.
METHODS: The light exposure profile of 143 school children (9-15 years, 50 myopes) recorded using a validated wearable light tracker for six continuous days was analysed. Additional data for non-school days were available for 87 children (26 myopes). The illuminance exposure levels, time spent outdoors and epoch (number of times participant is exposed to a predefined range of lux level per day) were compared between myopes and non-myopes across different light conditions: ≥1000, ≥3000, ≥5000 and ≥10 000 lux. For school days, light exposure profiles during (1) before school, school and after school hours; and (2) class, break and transition (when a student travels to and from school) time were analysed.
RESULTS: The overall median (IQR) daily illuminance exposure level, time spent outdoors and epochs at outdoors (≥1000 lux) were 807 (507-1079) lux/day, 46 (30-64) min/day and 9 (6-12) times/day, respectively. The daily illuminance exposure on non-school days was significantly higher in non-myopes than myopes (6369 (4508-9112) vs 5623 (2616-6929) lux/day, p=0.04). During transition time (school days), non-myopes had significantly higher illuminance exposure (910 (388-1479) vs 550 (263-1098) lux/day, p=0.04), spent more time outdoors (25 (10-43) vs 14 (4-29) min/day, p=0.01) and had higher outdoor epochs (6 (4-11) vs 5 (2-8) times/day, p=0.01) than myopes.
CONCLUSIONS: A small but significant difference in illuminance exposure, time spent outdoors and epoch was noted between myopes and non-myopes during transition time, which may have implications in myopia control.
PMID:38816010 | DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001469
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 29;13(Suppl 1):e002697. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002697.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Sick preterm neonates are most vulnerable to developing skin injuries. Despite sound knowledge and application of evidence-based practices for preventing medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI), the incidence of MARSI was 30 events per 1000 adhesive application days in our unit.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to reduce the median MARSI rate from the existing 30 per 1000 MARSI days to <5 per 1000 MARSI over 5 months from June 2023 to October 2023.
MATERIAL & METHODS: With the point-of-care quality improvement (QI) approach, a prospective study was planned to reduce the incidence of MARSI among sick very preterm newborns (<32 weeks gestational age) and eventually improve overall skin condition during hospital stay. Sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented based on the identified risk factors recognised during recurring team discussions.
RESULTS: We demonstrated a reduction in the MARSI rate from 30 events per 1000 adhesive applications (during baseline assessment) to zero events per 1000 adhesive applications at the end of the study period. It was temporally related to the assessment of skin risk stratification at admission using a validated tool, regular assessment of neonatal skin condition score based on the skin risk stratification, and reinforcement of MARSI prevention bundle by application of barrier spray. Awareness regarding ‘skin injury prevention’ bundles was continually generated among healthcare professionals. The MARSI rate remained <5 events per adhesive application in the sustenance phase over 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Implementing evidence-based skin care practices resulted in a significant reduction in iatrogenic cutaneous injury events in very preterm neonates.
PMID:38816009 | DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002697
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 30;13(2):e002790. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002790.
ABSTRACT
Previous work found referrals for end-of-life care are made late in the dying process and assessment processes for care funding, through continuing healthcare fast-track funding often inhibit people being able to die at home. The average time to discharge was 6.3 days and 29% died in hospital, as median survival was only 15 days.We aimed to support discharge to home within 1 day by December 2023 for patients, wishing to die at home, referred to the end-of-life discharge team in a medium-sized district general hospital in Southwest England.In phase 1, we identified 13 people on a patient-by-patient basis, learning from obstacles. Barriers identified included sourcing of equipment, communication between teams and clunky paperwork. Median time to discharge was 2 days (range within 24 hours to 8 days) with 2/13 (15.4%) dying prior to discharge. In phase 2, we extended the pilot, and 104 patients were identified; 94 people were discharged to home, with a median of wait of 1 day (range 0-7) to discharge, and 10 (9.6%) died prior to discharge (median 1 day; range 0-4). Median survival from discharge for the 94 who achieved their wishes to go home to die was 9 days (range 1-205 days). Only 26/94 (27.7%) people survived more than 30 days.Rapid decision-making and structures to support home-based end-of-life care can support more people to die in their preferred place of care, by using a community-based rapid response team instead of, or in parallel with continuing healthcare fast-track funding referral applications. Current pathways and funding models are not fit for purpose in an urgent care scenario when we have only one chance to get it right.
PMID:38816007 | DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002790
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 29;13(2):e002745. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002745.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patient safety is a high priority in the Danish health care system, including that hospital patients get the proper nutrition during their stay. A Nutrition Committee at Odense University Hospital is responsible for policy regarding nourishment at the hospital. If patients experience suboptimal treatment, i.e. improper nourishment, in the Danish health care system, they have the right to file a complaint. These complaints enable the improvement potentials based on the patients’ first hand experiences. Therefore, our aim was to examine the nutrition complaint pattern and to get a deeper understanding of the context surrounding nutrition problems, allowing the extraction of learning potentials.
METHODS: We analysed complaints submitted to Odense University Hospital between 2018 and 2022 using the Healthcare Complaint Analysis Tool. The complaints were categorised into categories, levels of severity and overall patient harm. The complaints containing a high-severity nutrition problem were read through and thematised into aspects not defined in the Healthcare Complaint Analysis Tool.
RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, 60 complaint cases containing 89 nutrition problems were filed to Odense University Hospital. Most (58.3%) of these were filed by the patients’ relatives. The nutrition problems were mostly of low severity (56.2%), while 23.6% were severe, and 20.2% were very severe. The reading of 18 very severe nutrition complaints revealed a cascade of problems triggered by the nutrition problem in six cases. Moreover, we saw that two high-severity nutrition problems led to catastrophic harm.
DISCUSSION: A low proportion of nutrition problems may express an underestimation regarding nourishment at the hospital. A patient’s threshold may not be exceeded by suboptimal nutrition and therefore does not file a complaint. However, complaints contain important insights contributing to wider learning, given that improvements at the hospital so far are based on clinicians’ reporting, overlooking the patient perspective.
PMID:38816005 | DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002745
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 29;13(2):e002608. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002608.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Adequate situational awareness in patient care increases patient safety and quality of care. To improve situational awareness, an innovative, low-fidelity simulation method referred to as Room of Improvement, has proven effective in various clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact after 3 months of Room of Improvement training on the ability to detect patient safety hazards during an intensive care unit shift handover, based on critical incident reporting system (CIRS) cases reported in the same hospital.
METHODS: In this educational intervention, 130 healthcare professionals observed safety hazards in a Room of Improvement in a 2 (time 1 vs time 2)×2 (alone vs in a team) factorial design. The hazards were divided into immediately critical and non-critical.
RESULTS: The results of 130 participants were included in the analysis. At time 1, no statistically significant differences were found between individuals and teams, either overall or for non-critical errors. At time 2, there was an increase in the detection rate of all implemented errors for teams compared with time 1, but not for individuals. The detection rate for critical errors was higher than for non-critical errors at both time points, with individual and group results at time 2 not significantly different from those at time 1. An increase in the perception of safety culture was found in the pre-post test for the questions whether the handling of errors is open and professional and whether errors are discussed in the team.
DISCUSSION: Our results indicate a sustained learning effect after 12 weeks, with collaboration in teams leading to a significantly better outcome. The training improved the actual error detection rates, and participants reported improved handling and discussion of errors in their daily work. This indicates a subjectively improved safety culture among healthcare workers as a result of the situational awareness training in the Room of Improvement. As this method promotes a culture of safety, it is a promising tool for a well-functioning CIRS that closes the loop.
PMID:38816004 | DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002608