Tag: statistics

Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Feb 23:1-15. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00084. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Purpose This article describes the development and initial validation of the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) Involvement in Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Questionnaire. It was developed to measure the extent to which SLPs are involved in MTSS at their school site(s). Method A total of 567 SLPs practicing in the United States responded to up to 39 Likert-type items meant to reflect six domains: scope of practice, professional development, leadership, consulting/collaborating, assessment and analysis, and intervention. Measurement quality was evaluated in terms of score reliability and validity. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the internal structure of the questionnaire responses. A three-factor model with the following dimensions of Carrying out Roles and Responsibilities, Leading, and Planning and Providing Interventions was supported. Loadings for retained factors ranged from .35 to .87. Internal consistency estimates ranged from .87 to .92. Descriptive statistics summarized the overall involvement of SLPs in MTSS, and responses to questions to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this questionnaire were analyzed. Results Questionnaire responses indicated that SLPs infrequently engage in MTSS activities. The item with the highest mean was related to SLPs collaborating with teachers to help them address students’ speech and language disorders in their classrooms. Most of the SLPs who took the questionnaire found it easy to complete, but only some found the information to be useful. Conclusions The infrequent involvement of SLPs in MTSS indicates a need to disseminate information on the potentially valuable roles SLPs can play in MTSS implementation. This tool may be used by SLPs to better understand contributions they can make within an MTSS framework and self-reflect on their current levels of involvement. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13874516.

PMID:33621114 | DOI:10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00084

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 23:1-14. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00423. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Purpose Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a developmental disorder where children fail to acquire language in the absence of a clear cause. Many studies have reported general motor deficits in children with DLD, but no studies have uncovered a cure. The purpose of our study is to better understand the underlying motor deficits in DLD, starting from uninhibited primary reflexes-which are the most basic stage of motor development. Knowledge of this motor-language relationship should lead to earlier and more targeted interventions in young children with DLD. Method Children with DLD (n = 75, age range: 4-10 years) and 99 age-matched typically developing (TD) children completed a nonword repetition test to assess DLD and six other tests to assess primitive reflexes. Results Children with DLD demonstrated higher levels of persistent primitive reflexes compared to TD children. As the scores for neuromotor immaturity increased, nonword repetition test scores decreased (r = -.44, p < .01). Results indicated that TD children exhibited lower neuromotor immaturity (M = 7.63, SD = 3.75) compared to children with DLD (M = 13.51, SD = 4.47). All primitive reflexes (the Moro reflex, the symmetrical tonic neck reflex in flexion and in extension, the asymmetrical tonic neck reflex, the tonic labyrinthine reflex, and the Galant reflex) turned out to be statistically significantly different for the TD and DLD groups (p < .001). We also observed some differences between sexes. Conclusions Children with impaired language development underwent slower neuromotor development. However, further research is needed to determine whether motor intervention programs that inhibit primitive reflexes are helpful for children with DLD.

PMID:33621124 | DOI:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00423

Salud Publica Mex. 2020 Nov-Dec;62(6):618-626. doi: 10.21149/11876.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate changes in the quality of process of care and its association with glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changes in compliance of 14 process of care indicators for 9 038 adults with type 2 diabetes and glycaemic control in a subsample were estimated. Averages, weighted changes and associations without or controlling for other factors were estimated us-ing statistical weights for the combined data (Ensanut 2012 and Ensanut 2018-19).

RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018-19, glycaemic control doubled. Early detection of complications and increased insuline use improved, but identification and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors decreased. The overall quality of care was associated with optimal glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS: There are areas of opportunity for improvement of quality of care, that deserve comprehensive strategies and continuous monitoring.

PMID:33620960 | DOI:10.21149/11876

Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):544-548. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0310.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: When the vasectomy reversal (VR) fails, and the patient desires natural conception with his sperm, vasectomy re-reversal (VRR) is the only alternative.

PURPOSE: To determine the VRR effectiveness and whether specific parameters can be associated with its success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 18 consecutive vasectomized patients, who had failed their VR through bilateral vasovasostomy, and posteriorly were submitted to VRR. The parameters of the study were: age of the patients, elapsed time between vasectomy and VRR (V-VRRt), elapsed time between VR and VRR (VR-VRRt), presence of spermatozoa in the proximal vas deferens fluid (SptzVDF) in the VRR and results of semen analysis after VRR (SA-VRR).

RESULTS: The mean of the age of the patients was 44.11±6.55 years (32.0-57.0), the mean of V-VRRt was 11.76±6.46 years (1.5-25.0) and the mean of VR-VRRt was 2.13±2.27 years (0.5-10.0). SptzVDF in the VRR were found bilaterally in 8 patients, unilaterally in 4 and absent in 6. SA-VRR demonstrated normozoospermia in 9 patients, oligozoospermia in 3 and azoospermia in 6, with patency rate of 66.67%. SA-VRR showed statistically significant dependence only with SptzVDF in the VRR (p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: VRR was effective in restoring the obstruction in more than half of the patients. Furthermore, the presence of spermatozoa in the vas deferens fluid was the parameter associated with the VRR success.

PMID:33621001 | DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0310

Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):584-593. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0568.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present prospective-randomized study was to compare perioperative outcomes and complications of bipolar and monopolar TURBT for lateral wall-located non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC) under obturator nerve block (ONB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 80 patients who underwent TURBT for lateral wall-located primary bladder tumors under ONB from March, 2016 to November, 2019 were included in the present study. The patients were randomized equally into two groups; monopolar TUR (M-TURBT) and bipolar TUR (B-TURBT). The primary and secondary outcomes were safety (obturator jerk and bladder perforation) and efficacy (complete tumor resection and sampling of the deep muscle tissue).

RESULTS: Obturator jerk was detected in 2 patients (5%) in M-TURBT while obturator jerk was not observed during B-TURBT (p=0.494). Bladder perforation was not observed in both groups. All of the patients underwent complete tumor resection. There was no significant difference in muscle tissue sampling (67.5% vs. 72.5%, p=0.626) and thermal tissue damage rates (12.5% vs. 25%, p=0.201). The majority of complications were low-grade and the differences in Clavien grade 1-3 complications between groups were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: In the treatment of lateral-wall located NMIBCs, either M-TURBT or B-TURBT can be safely and effectively performed by combining spinal anesthesia with ONB. Even so, it should be taken into consideration that low-grade postoperative hemorrhagic complications may occur in patients who undergo M-TURBT.

PMID:33621007 | DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0568

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Mar 15;46(6):374-382. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003796.

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic (EMG) gait variables in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and congenital scoliosis and to compare these gait variables of scoliosis patients with healthy controls.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Earlier studies have solely focussed on the possibility of altered gait patterns in AIS patients; not much light has been shed on the differences in gait patterns in congenital and adolescent scoliosis patients.

METHODS: Forty scoliosis patients (20 each with AIS and congenital scoliosis) and 20 healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited. After thorough clinical and radiological examination, all patients underwent gait analysis in accordance with standard protocols.The outcome measures included spatiotemporal, kinetic, kinematic and EMG activity. Composite indices for gait analysis-Gait Profile Score (GPS) and Gait Deviation Index (GDI)-were also calculated. Relevant statistical tests were applied to compare the different groups.

RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the AIS and congenital scoliosis groups with respect to baseline demographic and radiological parameters. The two subgroups of scoliosis patients (AIS and congenital) did not differ significantly with respect to any of the measured gait analysis parameters. However, when compared to the healthy age-matched control group, the scoliosis patients differed significantly with respect to gait speed, stride length, step length, GDI, GPS and peak EMG activation for erector spinae, biceps femoris, semimembranosus, rectus femoris, gastrocnemious, and tibialis anterior.

CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm the previous findings of literature regarding the alteration in gait patterns in scoliosis patients when compared to normal individuals. However, the lack of difference in gait analysis variables between AIS and congenital scoliosis patients suggests that this alteration in gait is secondary to the existence of the deformity and does not correlate with the onset or etiology of deformity.Level of Evidence: 2.

PMID:33620181 | DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003796

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb 22. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01270. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The interactions between physicians and industry are necessary for advancement of clinical practice and improvement in medical devices. Physician-industry relationships also introduces financial conflicts of interest into research publications. Payments to physicians do not inherently introduce bias in research, but failure to disclose potential conflicts of interest can negatively impact the perceived integrity of authors, editors, and journals. The conflict of interest disclosure statement in all articles published in the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery between 2014 and 2018 were compared to the financial payments indexed in the Center for Open Payments Database. Payment type, magnitude, and payer were obtained for each payment meeting inclusion criteria. Statistical comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney comparisons due to non-normal distribution of payment amounts. 704 articles involving 2596 authors were reviewed, with 1268 authors meeting inclusion criteria. 634 authors had accurate disclosure statements. The total amount of disclosed payments was $169 million, whereas undisclosed payments were $14.2 million. The amount of disclosed payments on a per-author basis, $55,844 ($12,559, $186,129), was significantly greater than undisclosed payments, $2,171 ($568, $7,238). The lowest rates of correct disclosure were in education (29.2%), gifts (38.7%) and honoraria (57.8%). First and middle authors disclosed correctly at a significantly lower rate than last authors. The magnitude of undisclosed payments was significantly lower than disclosed payments, indicating that these payments do not register with authors as significant enough to disclose.

PMID:33620174 | DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01270

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Feb 23:e12832. doi: 10.1111/anec.12832. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUD: Present electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) usually have low sensitivity, while the newly proposed SD + SV4 criterion, namely the deepest S-wave amplitude in any lead (SD) plus SV4 amplitude, has been reported to have higher sensitivity and accuracy compared with other existing criteria. We aimed to further evaluate the diagnostic value of the SD + SV4 criterion in reference to the gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in LVH diagnosis.

METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 138 patients who received CMR examination-60 patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and 78 patients with preserved EF. The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by CMR was used as the gold standard for diagnosing LVH.

RESULT: The diagnostic value of the SD + SV4 criterion was compared with other 4 commonly used criteria. By CMR, 29 out of 138 people (21%) were diagnosed with LVH in reference to CMR. The SD + SV4 criterion had markedly higher sensitivity in diagnosing LVH compared with other criteria, but no higher specificity. There was no significant difference in area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve among these criteria. The SD + SV4 criterion was not markedly consistent with CMR in diagnosing LVH. Compared to the other criteria, the SD + SV4 criterion had the highest sensitivity in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, the area under the curve (AUC) of the SD + SV4 criterion in patients with reduced EF was significantly lower than in patients with preserved EF.

CONCLUSION: The newly proposed SD + SV4 criterion did not have a better diagnostic value compared with other existing criteria, and the statistical power of the SD + SV4 criterion was influenced by EF.

PMID:33620147 | DOI:10.1111/anec.12832

Cancer Med. 2021 Feb 23. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3732. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To date there has not been an extensive analysis of the outcomes of biomarker use in oncology.

METHODS: Data were pooled across four indications in oncology drawing upon trial outcomes from www.clinicaltrials.gov: breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma and colorectal cancer from 1998 to 2017. We compared the likelihood drugs would progress through the stages of clinical trial testing to approval based on biomarker status. This was done with multi-state Markov models, tools that describe the stochastic process in which subjects move among a finite number of states.

RESULTS: Over 10000 trials were screened, which yielded 745 drugs. The inclusion of biomarker status as a covariate significantly improved the fit of the Markov model in describing the drug trajectories through clinical trial testing stages. Hazard ratios based on the Markov models revealed the likelihood of drug approval with biomarkers having nearly a fivefold increase for all indications combined. A 12, 8 and 7-fold hazard ratio was observed for breast cancer, melanoma and NSCLC, respectively. Markov models with exploratory biomarkers outperformed Markov models with no biomarkers.

CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic statistical evidence that biomarkers clearly increase clinical trial success rates in three different indications in oncology. Also, exploratory biomarkers, long before they are properly validated, appear to improve success rates in oncology. This supports early and aggressive adoption of biomarkers in oncology clinical trials.

PMID:33620160 | DOI:10.1002/cam4.3732

Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Feb 23:1-12. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1884286. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to reduce mortality of COVID-19. We examined if corticosteroids and tocilizumab reduce risk for death in patients with severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single university hospital. All adult patients admitted with confirmed severe COVID-19 pneumonia from 9 March to 9 April 2020 were included. Severe pneumonia was defined as multi-lobar or bilateral pneumonia and a ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry to the fraction of inspired oxygen (SpFi)<315. All patients received antiviral and antibiotic treatment. From March 26, patients also received immunomodulatory treatment with corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 250 mg/day for 3 days), or tocilizumab or both. In-hospital mortality in the entire cohort and in a 1:1 matched cohort sub-analysis was evaluated.

RESULTS: 255 patients were included, 118 received only antiviral and antibiotic treatment while 137, admitted after March 26, also received immunomodulators. In-hospital mortality of patients on immunomodulatory treatment was significantly lower than in those without [47/137(34.3%) vs. 69/118(58.5%), (p < .001)]. The risk of death was 0.44 (CI, 0.26-0.76) in patients receiving corticosteroids alone and 0.292 (CI, 0.18-0.47) in those treated with corticosteroids and tocilizumab. In the sub-analysis with 202 matched patients, the risk of death was 0.356 (CI 0.179-0.707) in patients receiving corticosteroids alone and 0.233 (0.124-0.436) in those treated with the combination.

CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with corticosteroids and tocilizumab reduced mortality with about 25% in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Corticosteroids alone also resulted in lower in-hospital mortality rate compared to patients receiving only antiviral and antibiotic treatment. Corticosteroids alone or combined with tocilizumab may be considered in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

PMID:33620019 | DOI:10.1080/23744235.2021.1884286