J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Dec 10;126:105031. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105031. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation of endodontically treated premolars with extensive coronal destruction through endocrown approach remains a controversial topic in reconstructive dentistry. There is no clear consensus in the literature which endocrown design with which material is the most effective restoration option for severely-destructed endodontically treated premolars. The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars restored with a novel endocrown system compared to the conventional one varying the applied load type through finite element and in vitro analyses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For finite element analysis, two models representing two endocrown systems used for restoration of severely-destructed endodontically treated maxillary first premolar tooth were generated: Model C for the conventional monolithic IPS e.max CAD endocrown and Model P for the novel bi-layered endocrown (PEKKTON ivory coping veneered with cemented IPS e.max CAD). Modified von Mises stress values on the remaining tooth structure, cement lines and restorative materials were evaluated separately under axial and oblique loading of 450 N. For in vitro analysis, forty sound human bifurcated maxillary first premolars were collected, endodontically-treated, and divided into 2 main groups (n = 20) according to the system used for endocrown fabrication; Group C: the conventional monolithic endocrowns and Group P: the novel bi-layered endocrowns. All specimens were subjected to an artificial thermomechanical aging protocol. Each main group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the loading type (axial and oblique) applied during the fracture resistance test. Qualitative analysis using Stereomicroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy was performed. Data were statistically analyzed at p-value ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Regarding stress distribution pattern of remaining tooth structure (enamel and dentin), both endocrown systems and cement lines under both axial and oblique load application, Model P resulted in lower stresses than Model C. The oblique stress values of all analyzed structures were higher than corresponding values resulted axially. Considering failure load, a significantly higher load was recorded for Group P when axial or oblique loading was applied (p = 0.00). A significantly higher failure load was recorded with axial loading for both main groups. With regard to failure mode, a statistically significant difference was observed between main groups (p = 0.033), with more favorable failures detected for Group P axially.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the conventional endocrown system, the studied novel system improved the biomechanical behavior within tooth/restoration complex of the restored severely-destructed endodontically treated maxillary first premolar teeth, whatever the applied load type.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The novel endocrown system using a PEKK coping veneered with cemented IPS e.max CAD can be considered a favorable promising option for restoration of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth, with more protection for residual tooth structure. It can be considered as a conservative alternative option to the conventional treatment modalities not only for normal clinical conditions, but also for parafunctional cases.
PMID:34922296 | DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105031
