Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 23. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003219. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap is a reliable alternative to abdominally based breast reconstruction because of its advantageous anatomy. However, the limited tissue volume prevents reconstruction of large breasts. The bilateral TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can overcome this problem.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed regarding unilateral breast reconstruction with bilateral TUGs at the Queen Victoria Hospital from 2015 to 2019. Associations between categorical variables were examined with Fisher exact test, and any differences in continuous variables by complication status were evaluated with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for independent samples. A relevant systematic review was conducted with a meta-analysis of proportions using the Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation for the estimation of the overall survival rates.
RESULTS: Ten cases were identified with 6 having a delayed reconstruction. Median age and body mass index were 50.8 years and 23.9 kg/m2, respectively, and average flap weight was 268.3 g. One flap was placed superiorly with its pedicle anastomosed to the retrograde internal mammary vessels, except of half of the cases where a second anterograde vein was used. The mean follow-up was 21.4 months, and all flaps survived. Two patients returned to theater, and 4 experienced donor-site problems. The presence of complications was not associated with age, ever smoking, body mass index, TUG weight, or anastomosis to retrograde internal mammary vein. The systematic review resulted in 8 eligible articles with a total sample of 156 flaps. The overall survival rate was 96.8%. In 6 cases, the indication was Poland syndrome (7.7%), and in 48.7%, axillary vessels were also used as recipient vessels. The estimated overall flap survival rate was 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), and no significant heterogeneity was noted (I2 = 0%, P = 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: The “2-in-1” technique can lead to symmetrical aesthetically pleasant results for both recipient and donor sites. Our case series and the conducted systematic review reiterate the reliability of this approach.
PMID:35502959 | DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003219
