Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus standard of care in the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07571-9. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitor plus chemotherapy vs standard of care (SoC) treatment in the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-SCCHN).

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy vs SoC as first-line treatment for R/M-SCCHN were searched from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library). The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS: In total, three phase 3 RCTs (KEYNOTE-048, CAPTAIN-1st, and JUPITER-02; n = 1120) with three PD-1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, camrelizumab and toripalimab) were included in the analysis. Compared with SoC, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.40-0.93, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.001) of patients. There was no statistical differences in ORR (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; 95% CI 0.97-1.64, p = 0.086), grade 3 or higher AEs (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50-1.17, p = 0.221), and treatment-related deaths (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.60-2.98, p = 0.470) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy showed more survival benefit than SoC in the first-line treatment for R/M-SCCHN, with a similar safety profile.

PMID:35907001 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-022-07571-9

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala