J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Oct 25. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12978. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The cement bonding strategy and the polymerization mode can influence the prognosis of indirect restorations. The microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and dentin endogenous enzymatic activity of a dual-cure resin cement (PV5) used in combination with two dentin surface conditioners (accelerator-enhancer primer, TP or universal adhesive, UA) were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PV5 was used to lute composite overlays after dentin treatment with TP or UA. The resin cement was self-cured, SC (1 h at 37 °C) or dual-cured, DC (20 s light-cure followed by 15 min self-cure at 37°C). The μTBS test, fractographic analysis, and the in situ zymography evaluations were performed after 24 h (T0 ) or 1 yr (T12 ) of artificial storage. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: TP/DC obtained the highest adhesive strengths (45 ± 9 and 36.6 ± 8), while UA/SC (17 ± 8 and 11 ± 4) the lowest, both at T0 and T12 , respectively. DC resulted in superior bonding values than the SC, independent of the dentin surface treatment (p < 0.05). The type of adhesive, curing mode and aging influenced the gelatinolytic activity (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The dual-cure resin cement used in combination with its accelerator-enhancer primer showed superior bonding performances with respect to universal adhesive. Dual-curing the resin cement was determinant to enhance bonding capability over time, independent of the adhesive strategy.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians must be aware to faithfully follow manufacturer’s recommendation regarding the adhesive strategy suggested with the resin cement used.
PMID:36281586 | DOI:10.1111/jerd.12978
