Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep 15;44(5):363-367.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of three different brands of prefabricated pediatric zirconia crowns (ZRCs) following simulated toothbrushing with a variety of dentifrices. Methods: Ninety-six total maxillary right central incisor prefabricated pediatric ZRCs (n equals 32 ZRCs/brand) were obtained from the manufacturers: Kinder Krowns®, NuSmile®, and Sprig®. ZRCs were equally assigned to dentifrices (n equals eight/dentifrice) with a variety of Relative Dentin Abrasion (RDA) values: Tom’s of Maine Children’s; Crest Kid’s; Prevident 5000; and Crest® Pro-Health. ZRCs were brushed 10,000 strokes with a V-8 Toothbrushing Machine using the assigned dentifrices. Pre- and post-intervention data for the surface roughness of ZRCs, represented in Ra (average roughness) and Rz (mean roughness depth), were obtained using a stylus profilometer. Data were analyzed independently using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with the Holm- Sidak method (α equals 0.05). Results: Baseline versus brushed Ra Kinder Krowns® with Prevident and Sprig® with Crest Kid’s indicated statistically significant differences. Sprig® versus NuSmile® utilizing Crest Kid’s were different in change in roughness. Both baseline and brushed NuSmile® dentifrice options were different versus all Sprig® and Kinder® ZRCs. Conclusions: Despite statistical significance, changes in surface roughness were small in scale. Although this study did not address toothbrushing and different dentifrices may affect the mechanical properties, durability, and/or retention properties of ZRCs, the study’s results provide confidence to clinicians when using prefabricated pediatric ZRCs as a sustainable treatment option along with other restorative options, such as strip crowns and stainless steel crowns.
PMID:36309785
