J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Nov 15:glac230. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac230. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of different modes of resistance exercise velocity in fast walking speed, timed-up and go, five-times sit-to-stand, 30-sec sit-to-stand and 6-min walking tests in older adults.
METHODS: CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Scielo, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 2022. Eligible randomised trials examined the effects of supervised high-velocity or traditional resistance exercise in older adults (i.e., ≥ 60 years). The primary outcome for this review was physical function measured by fast walking speed, timed up and go, five times sit-to-stand, 30-sec sit-to-stand and 6-minute walking tests, while maximal muscle power and muscle strength were secondary. A random-effects network meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the effects of different resistance exercise interventions.
RESULTS: Eighty articles describing 79 trials (n= 3,575) were included. High-velocity resistance exercise was the most effective for improving fast walking speed [standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.44, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.87], timed-up and go (SMD -0.76, 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.47) and five times sit-to-stand (SMD -0.74, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.27), while traditional resistance exercise was the most effective for 30-sec sit-to-stand (SMD 1.01, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.34) and 6-min walking (SMD 0.68, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.03).
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that resistance exercise velocity effects are specific in older adults as evidenced by physical function test dependence. We suggest that prescription based on the velocity of contraction should be individualised to address specific functional needs of participants.
PMID:36378500 | DOI:10.1093/gerona/glac230
