Am J Surg Pathol. 2022 Nov 2. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001991. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsies (CNBs) and surgical excisional biopsies (SEBs), samples of lymphoid proliferation from a single institution from 2013 to 2017 (N=476) were divided into groups of CNB (N=218) and SEB (N=258). The diagnostic accuracy of these samples was evaluated as a percentage of conclusive diagnosis, according to the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. The contribution of clinical data, the assessment of sample adequacy by a pathologist during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, the needle gauge, the ancillary tests, and the type of lymphoid proliferation were also examined. The diagnostic accuracy of SEB was 97.3% and CNB 91.3% (P=0.010). Additional factors considered essential for establishing the final diagnosis in some cases were: clinical information (20.6% CNB, 7.4% SEB; P<0.001); immunohistochemistry (96.3% CNB, 91.5% SEB; P=0.024); flow cytometry (12% CNB, 6.8% SEB; P=0.165); and other complementary tests (8.2% CNB, 17.3% SEB; P=0.058). Factors that did not influence performance were the evaluation of sample adequacy during the procedure, the number and size of fragments, and the needle gauge. Increased percentage of nondiagnostic CNB was observed in T-cell lymphomas (30%), followed by classic Hodgkin lymphoma (10.6%). The main limitation of CNB was the evaluation of morphologically heterogenous diseases. CNB is useful and safe in lymphoma diagnosis provided it is carried out by a team of experienced professionals. Having an interventional radiology team engaged with pathology is an essential component to achieve adequate rates of specific diagnoses in CNB specimens.
PMID:36395467 | DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001991
