BMC Urol. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01169-3.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Comparison between three different surgical techniques in the management of concealed penis.
METHODS: This prospective interventional non-randomized study included 150 pediatric patients with a concealed penis. They were distributed equally into three groups; group A; patients treated by anchoring the penile skin dermis to Buck’s fascia at the penile base at 3 and 9 o’clock points using PDS 5/0 (phallopexy), group B; patients treated by complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia and group C; patients treated by phallopexy as in group A after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia. Follow-up at the end of the 1st post-operative week and then monthly for 6 months as regards penile skin congestion and/or necrosis, wound infection, edema, and/or re-retraction was carried out.
RESULTS: Penile edema and re-retraction have a statistically significant difference among the studied groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Penile re-retraction was noticed to be lowest in patients of group C, however penile edema was observed to be highest in patients of group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Phallopexy after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia have better results than doing either phallopexy or dartos excision alone in the treatment of concealed penis.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The manuscript was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05565040. Our manuscript was registered on 4/10/2022.
PMID:36631822 | DOI:10.1186/s12894-022-01169-3
