Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13099-x. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple composite indices of small-area socioeconomic characteristics have been used to examine how neighborhood characteristics influence cancer care, but there is little consensus regarding how to use them. This scoping review aimed to summarize the use of these indices in cancer literature and their association with outcomes.
METHODS: A search was conducted to identify studies from 2015 to 2021 that investigated cancer incidence, disease stage at diagnosis, and mortality using area-based indices of deprivation as an independent variable. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. Data were extracted regarding the geospatial and statistical use of these indices.
RESULTS: All the inclusion criteria were met by 45 studies. The area level of analysis was at the census tract level in 19 studies (42.3%), the county level in 15 studies (33.3%), the block group level in 6 studies (13.3%), and the ZIP code level in 5 studies (11.1%). Altogether, 18 unique indices were used, with 4 indices used most frequently. Of the studies that used their indices ordinally, 3 defined high and low deprivation dichotomously, 10 used tertiles, 13 used quartiles, and 15 used quintiles. Of the 45 studies, 34 (76%) showed a significant association between area deprivation and cancer-related outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood deprivation indices are most commonly used at the census tract level and ordinally as quintiles. Despite variance in methods, there is a strong indication that deprived areas are at adverse odds with cancer-related outcomes. Further study investigating deprivation in the context of cancer can inform drivers of inequity and identify potential targets for care delivery and policy interventions.
PMID:36695989 | DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-13099-x
