Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07135-0. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To study whether it is better to perform or not a myomectomy, in terms of surgical and reproductive outcomes in patients of advanced reproductive age, by an observational prospective study in university-affiliated and Community Hospitals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 years and older patients affected by non-submucous symptomatic uterine fibroids and desiring future fertility were enrolled and treated by laparoscopic intracapsular myomectomy by (LIM) or by open laparotomy (OIM), or by a non-surgical management as control group, while attempting to conceive. The primary outcome measures were fibroid characteristics, pre- and post-surgical parameters, pregnancy achievement; the secondary outcome measures were the spontaneous or ART pregnancy outcomes, eventual week of abortion and type of delivery. Propensity scores have been calculated with logistic regression for binary and continuous variables.
RESULTS: 202 patients completed the study: 112 operated by LIM, 40 by OIM and 50 patients as control group. Patients undergoing OIM have a worse surgical outcome than LIM. No difference was seen in pregnancy either after myomectomy or control group during follow-up. In the LIM group, there were 44 pregnancies (39.2%), and in the OIM group, there were 9 (22.5%) and 16 in the control group (32%). The weeks of delivery were statistically greater for the control group versus the surgical groups, with no difference in Apgar score between the 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients aged over 40 years did not show substantial differences in reproductive outcome, whether operated or not. Myomectomy in over 40-year-old patients has no detrimental effect on future pregnancy rates and over when compared to expectant management.
PMID:37450263 | DOI:10.1007/s00404-023-07135-0
